Cultural humility and racial microaggressions in cross-racial clinical supervision: A moderated mediation model.

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Journal of Counseling Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1037/cou0000732
Melanie M Wilcox, Aisha Farra, Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Elinita Pollard, Joanna M Drinane, Karen W Tao, Cirleen DeBlaere, Joshua N Hook, Don E Davis, C Edward Watkins, Jesse Owen
{"title":"Cultural humility and racial microaggressions in cross-racial clinical supervision: A moderated mediation model.","authors":"Melanie M Wilcox, Aisha Farra, Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Elinita Pollard, Joanna M Drinane, Karen W Tao, Cirleen DeBlaere, Joshua N Hook, Don E Davis, C Edward Watkins, Jesse Owen","doi":"10.1037/cou0000732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cultural humility is important in supervision; however, studies have primarily sampled White supervisees. Racially and ethnically minoritized trainees experience microaggressions during their training, yet cross-racial supervision is less often studied. We examined a moderated mediation model to test whether the supervisory working alliance mediated the relationship between frequency of racial microaggressions and satisfaction with supervision, and whether the impact of racial microaggressions on the supervisee and supervisor cultural humility moderated the relationship between racial microaggression frequency and the supervisory working alliance. In a sample of supervisees of color (<i>N</i> = 102; majority cisgender women, 86.2%, and heterosexual, 59.8%; 35.3% Black/African American, 28.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 18.6% Hispanic/Latine) receiving clinical supervision from White supervisors, we found that racial microaggression frequency was negatively associated with satisfaction with supervision, and this relationship was fully accounted for by the supervisory working alliance. Racial microaggressions in supervision were found to be detrimental to the supervisory working alliance, which was then related to lower satisfaction with supervision. Further, racial microaggression impact and cultural humility moderated the relationship between racial microaggression frequency and the supervisory working alliance; this relationship was strongest when racial microaggression impact was high and cultural humility was average or high. The social bond hypothesis suggests we are more likely to allow ourselves to be vulnerable when we assess cultural humility to be high. We posit that the observed moderation effect may be due to supervisees experiencing greater shock when experiencing racial microaggressions from supervisors whom they perceived to be culturally humble. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000732","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural humility is important in supervision; however, studies have primarily sampled White supervisees. Racially and ethnically minoritized trainees experience microaggressions during their training, yet cross-racial supervision is less often studied. We examined a moderated mediation model to test whether the supervisory working alliance mediated the relationship between frequency of racial microaggressions and satisfaction with supervision, and whether the impact of racial microaggressions on the supervisee and supervisor cultural humility moderated the relationship between racial microaggression frequency and the supervisory working alliance. In a sample of supervisees of color (N = 102; majority cisgender women, 86.2%, and heterosexual, 59.8%; 35.3% Black/African American, 28.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 18.6% Hispanic/Latine) receiving clinical supervision from White supervisors, we found that racial microaggression frequency was negatively associated with satisfaction with supervision, and this relationship was fully accounted for by the supervisory working alliance. Racial microaggressions in supervision were found to be detrimental to the supervisory working alliance, which was then related to lower satisfaction with supervision. Further, racial microaggression impact and cultural humility moderated the relationship between racial microaggression frequency and the supervisory working alliance; this relationship was strongest when racial microaggression impact was high and cultural humility was average or high. The social bond hypothesis suggests we are more likely to allow ourselves to be vulnerable when we assess cultural humility to be high. We posit that the observed moderation effect may be due to supervisees experiencing greater shock when experiencing racial microaggressions from supervisors whom they perceived to be culturally humble. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

跨种族临床督导中的文化谦逊与种族微冒犯:调节中介模型。
文化谦逊在督导工作中非常重要;然而,相关研究主要以白人受督导者为样本。种族和人种上属于少数群体的受训者在受训期间也会遇到微词,但跨种族督导的研究却较少。我们研究了一个调节中介模型,以检验督导工作联盟是否调节了种族微攻击频率与督导满意度之间的关系,以及种族微攻击对被督导者和督导者文化谦逊的影响是否调节了种族微攻击频率与督导工作联盟之间的关系。在接受白人督导临床督导的有色人种被督导者样本中(样本数 = 102;顺性别女性占多数,86.2%;异性恋占 59.8%;黑人/非裔美国人占 35.3%,亚太裔占 28.4%,西班牙裔/拉丁裔占 18.6%),我们发现种族微侵犯频率与督导满意度呈负相关,而这种关系完全可以通过督导工作联盟来解释。研究发现,督导过程中的种族微攻击不利于督导工作联盟,进而导致督导满意度降低。此外,种族微攻击的影响和文化谦逊调节了种族微攻击频率与督导工作联盟之间的关系;当种族微攻击影响大、文化谦逊程度一般或高时,这种关系最强。社会纽带假设表明,当我们评估文化谦逊度较高时,我们更有可能允许自己处于弱势。我们认为,所观察到的调节效应可能是由于被督导者在受到他们认为文化谦逊的督导者的种族微冒犯时,会受到更大的冲击。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信