Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors.

Reza Eshraghi, Sina Shamsi, Masoumeh Safaee
{"title":"Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors.","authors":"Reza Eshraghi, Sina Shamsi, Masoumeh Safaee","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2024.101350.1489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the outcome and risk factors in operative and non-operative management of splenic injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with traumatic splenic injuries who were hospitalized in Kashani Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) from 2017 to 2019. The studied variables were extracted from the medical records of the enrolled participants. The outcomes such as mortality complications and risk factors were compared based on treatment methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 29.8±12.2, with 180 (77.5%) patients being men. 154 (64.2%) patients underwent operative treatment. The mortality rate was 18.9% and 4.6% among operative and non-operative groups (<i>p</i><0.001). Complications were observed in 11.5% and 46.1% of non-operative and operative groups, respectively (<i>p</i><0.001). Operative treatment inversely correlated with mortality (<i>p</i><0.001) and complications (<i>p</i><0.05). Splenic injury severity was correlated positively with mortality (<i>p</i><0.001) and negatively with complications (<i>p</i><0.001). Unstable hemodynamic status was positively correlated with complications (<i>p</i><0.001). Age had a positive correlation with mortality (<i>p</i><0.001) and complications (<i>p</i><0.001). Male sex had a negative correlation with complications (<i>p</i><0.001). GCS score and admission were positively correlated with mortality (<i>p</i><0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between correlated injuries and outcomes (<i>p</i>≥0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received surgery had higher rates of mortality and complications. However, after controlling for confounders, operative treatment was found to be inversely correlated with mortality and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"12 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2024.101350.1489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome and risk factors in operative and non-operative management of splenic injury.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with traumatic splenic injuries who were hospitalized in Kashani Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) from 2017 to 2019. The studied variables were extracted from the medical records of the enrolled participants. The outcomes such as mortality complications and risk factors were compared based on treatment methods.

Results: A total of 240 patients were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 29.8±12.2, with 180 (77.5%) patients being men. 154 (64.2%) patients underwent operative treatment. The mortality rate was 18.9% and 4.6% among operative and non-operative groups (p<0.001). Complications were observed in 11.5% and 46.1% of non-operative and operative groups, respectively (p<0.001). Operative treatment inversely correlated with mortality (p<0.001) and complications (p<0.05). Splenic injury severity was correlated positively with mortality (p<0.001) and negatively with complications (p<0.001). Unstable hemodynamic status was positively correlated with complications (p<0.001). Age had a positive correlation with mortality (p<0.001) and complications (p<0.001). Male sex had a negative correlation with complications (p<0.001). GCS score and admission were positively correlated with mortality (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between correlated injuries and outcomes (p≥0.05).

Conclusion: Patients who received surgery had higher rates of mortality and complications. However, after controlling for confounders, operative treatment was found to be inversely correlated with mortality and complications.

脾破裂的手术治疗与保守治疗:疗效与风险因素
目的:本研究旨在评估手术和非手术治疗脾损伤的结果和风险因素:本研究旨在评估手术和非手术治疗脾损伤的结果和风险因素:这项横断面研究的对象是 2017 年至 2019 年在卡沙尼医院(伊朗伊斯法罕)住院治疗的外伤性脾损伤患者。研究变量摘自入组参与者的病历。根据治疗方法对死亡率、并发症和风险因素等结果进行了比较:共调查了 240 名患者。患者的平均年龄为(29.8±12.2)岁,其中 180 名(77.5%)患者为男性。154例(64.2%)患者接受了手术治疗。手术组和非手术组的死亡率分别为 18.9% 和 4.6%(pppppppppppppp≥0.05):结论:接受手术治疗的患者死亡率和并发症发生率较高。结论:接受手术治疗的患者死亡率和并发症发生率较高,但在控制了混杂因素后发现,手术治疗与死亡率和并发症发生率成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信