Baron Antoine Dubois and the difficult childbirth of Napoleon I's second wife the Empress Marie Louise on 20 March 1811.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Jan Bosteels, Yves Jacquemyn
{"title":"Baron Antoine Dubois and the difficult childbirth of Napoleon I's second wife the Empress Marie Louise on 20 March 1811.","authors":"Jan Bosteels, Yves Jacquemyn","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2024.2350803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>History has paid little attention to the childbirth of Marie Louise, second wife to the Emperor Napoleon I. Most historians state that the obstetrician Antoine Dubois needed to use his forceps during a difficult breech delivery. As practicing obstetricians we aimed to reconstruct the likely course of events using a forensic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have consulted historical documents and key witness accounts as primary sources. We have followed the clinical guidance of the 1807 edition of 'l'Art des Accouchemens'. We have tested a new hypothesis of the possible course of the childbirth through a simulation using the Assisted Vaginal Birth Module PROMPT Flex CDE® as an obstetrical model and an authentic Levret forceps.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A transverse lie with hip presentation is the most plausible diagnosis of the foetal malposition that complicated the delivery of Marie Louise by Antoine Dubois. The long duration of the delivery of the entrapped foetal head and the insistence on the presence of his colleague Corvisart by Antoine Dubois can be explained through our hypothesis that the occiput of the entrapped foetal head was very likely in a transverse position. The seemingly impossible application of a forceps in this position, had already been described in the nineteenth century both in France and outside.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our simulation confirmed the practicability of the application of the forceps as assumed by our hypothesis. Definitive proof that this scenario actually happened, cannot be given because there are no written first-hand accounts by Dubois on the delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2024.2350803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: History has paid little attention to the childbirth of Marie Louise, second wife to the Emperor Napoleon I. Most historians state that the obstetrician Antoine Dubois needed to use his forceps during a difficult breech delivery. As practicing obstetricians we aimed to reconstruct the likely course of events using a forensic approach.

Methods: We have consulted historical documents and key witness accounts as primary sources. We have followed the clinical guidance of the 1807 edition of 'l'Art des Accouchemens'. We have tested a new hypothesis of the possible course of the childbirth through a simulation using the Assisted Vaginal Birth Module PROMPT Flex CDE® as an obstetrical model and an authentic Levret forceps.

Discussion: A transverse lie with hip presentation is the most plausible diagnosis of the foetal malposition that complicated the delivery of Marie Louise by Antoine Dubois. The long duration of the delivery of the entrapped foetal head and the insistence on the presence of his colleague Corvisart by Antoine Dubois can be explained through our hypothesis that the occiput of the entrapped foetal head was very likely in a transverse position. The seemingly impossible application of a forceps in this position, had already been described in the nineteenth century both in France and outside.

Conclusion: Our simulation confirmed the practicability of the application of the forceps as assumed by our hypothesis. Definitive proof that this scenario actually happened, cannot be given because there are no written first-hand accounts by Dubois on the delivery.

1811 年 3 月 20 日,安托万-杜波依斯男爵和拿破仑一世的第二任妻子玛丽-路易丝皇后难产。
背景历史上很少有人关注拿破仑一世的第二任妻子玛丽-路易丝的分娩过程。大多数历史学家都说,产科医生安托万-杜波依斯(Antoine Dubois)需要在臀位难产时使用产钳。作为一名执业产科医生,我们的目标是采用法医方法重建事件的可能过程。我们遵循了 1807 年版《l'Art des Accouchemens》的临床指导。我们使用辅助阴道分娩模块 PROMPT Flex CDE® 作为产科模型,并使用真正的 Levret 产钳进行模拟,对可能的分娩过程进行了新的假设检验。安托万-杜波依斯在娩出被夹住的胎头时持续了很长时间,而且坚持要他的同事科维萨尔在场,这可以用我们的假设来解释,即被夹住的胎头枕部很可能处于横位。我们的模拟证实了我们假设的使用产钳的可行性。由于杜波依斯没有关于分娩的第一手书面记录,因此无法提供这一情景是否真实发生的确凿证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信