Harmful self-pollination drives gynodioecy in European chestnut, a self-incompatible tree

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Clément Larue, Rémy J. Petit
{"title":"Harmful self-pollination drives gynodioecy in European chestnut, a self-incompatible tree","authors":"Clément Larue,&nbsp;Rémy J. Petit","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Gynodioecy is a rare sexual system in which two genders (<i>sensu</i> Lloyd, 1980), cosexuals and females, coexist. To survive, female plants must compensate for their lack of siring capacity and male attractiveness. In European chestnut (<i>Castanea sativa</i>), an outcrossing tree, self-pollination reduces fruit set in cosexual individuals because of late-acting self-incompatibility and early inbreeding depression. Could this negative sexual interaction explain the presence of females in this species?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied gender variation in wild populations of European chestnut. In addition, we compared fruit set (the proportion of flowers giving fruits) and other key female fitness components as well as reproductive allocation between genders. We then performed emasculation experiments in cosexual trees, by removing nectar-producing fertile male inflorescences. We also removed sterile but nectar-producing male inflorescences from female trees, as a control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found a highly variable proportion of male-sterile individuals in the wild in European chestnut. In the experimental plot, trees from each gender had similar size, flower density, and burr set, but different fruit set. Removing nectar-producing male inflorescences from branches or entire trees increased fruit set in cosexual but not in female trees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results show that self-pollination impairs fruit set in cosexual trees. Female trees avoid these problems as they do not produce pollen but continue to attract pollinators thanks to their rewarding male-sterile inflorescences, resulting in a much higher fruit set than in cosexuals. This demonstrates that even outcrossed plants can benefit from the cessation of self-pollination, to the point that unisexuality can evolve.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.16329","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Gynodioecy is a rare sexual system in which two genders (sensu Lloyd, 1980), cosexuals and females, coexist. To survive, female plants must compensate for their lack of siring capacity and male attractiveness. In European chestnut (Castanea sativa), an outcrossing tree, self-pollination reduces fruit set in cosexual individuals because of late-acting self-incompatibility and early inbreeding depression. Could this negative sexual interaction explain the presence of females in this species?

Methods

We studied gender variation in wild populations of European chestnut. In addition, we compared fruit set (the proportion of flowers giving fruits) and other key female fitness components as well as reproductive allocation between genders. We then performed emasculation experiments in cosexual trees, by removing nectar-producing fertile male inflorescences. We also removed sterile but nectar-producing male inflorescences from female trees, as a control.

Results

We found a highly variable proportion of male-sterile individuals in the wild in European chestnut. In the experimental plot, trees from each gender had similar size, flower density, and burr set, but different fruit set. Removing nectar-producing male inflorescences from branches or entire trees increased fruit set in cosexual but not in female trees.

Conclusions

These results show that self-pollination impairs fruit set in cosexual trees. Female trees avoid these problems as they do not produce pollen but continue to attract pollinators thanks to their rewarding male-sterile inflorescences, resulting in a much higher fruit set than in cosexuals. This demonstrates that even outcrossed plants can benefit from the cessation of self-pollination, to the point that unisexuality can evolve.

Abstract Image

有害的自花授粉促使欧洲栗树(一种自交不亲和的树种)雌雄异花授粉。
前言:雌雄同体是一种罕见的有性系统,其中有两种性别(参见劳埃德,1980 年),即同性和雌性共存。为了生存,雌性植物必须弥补其缺乏交配能力和雄性吸引力的缺陷。欧洲栗(Castanea sativa)是一种外交树种,自花授粉会降低同性个体的坐果率,原因是晚期自交不亲和和早期近交抑制。这种负面的性相互作用能否解释该物种中雌性个体的存在?我们研究了欧洲栗野生种群的性别差异。此外,我们还比较了两性间的坐果率(开花结果的比例)和其他关键的雌性适应性成分以及生殖分配。然后,我们在同性树上进行了去雄实验,方法是摘除分泌花蜜的可育雄性花序。作为对照,我们还摘除了雌树上不育但能分泌花蜜的雄花序:结果:我们发现欧洲栗野生雄性不育个体的比例变化很大。在实验地块中,每种性别的树木都有相似的大小、花密度和毛刺,但坐果率却不同。从树枝或整棵树上摘除分泌花蜜的雄花序能提高同性树的坐果率,但不能提高雌树的坐果率:这些结果表明,自花授粉会影响同性树的坐果率。雌树避免了这些问题,因为它们不产生花粉,但由于其雄性无性花序的奖励作用,继续吸引授粉者,从而使坐果率比同性树高得多。这表明,即使是外交植物也能从停止自花授粉中获益,甚至可以进化出单性植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信