Implementation of point-of-care platforms for rapid detection of porcine circovirus type 2.

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Chiao-Hsu Ke, Mao-Yuan Du, Wang-Ju Hsieh, Chiu-Chiao Lin, James Mingjuh Ting, Ming-Tang Chiou, Chao-Nan Lin
{"title":"Implementation of point-of-care platforms for rapid detection of porcine circovirus type 2.","authors":"Chiao-Hsu Ke, Mao-Yuan Du, Wang-Ju Hsieh, Chiu-Chiao Lin, James Mingjuh Ting, Ming-Tang Chiou, Chao-Nan Lin","doi":"10.4142/jvs.23323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection is ubiquitous around the world. Diagnosis of the porcine circovirus-associated disease requires clinic-pathological elements together with the quantification of viral loads. Furthermore, given pig farms in regions lacking access to sufficient laboratory equipment, developing diagnostic devices with high accuracy, accessibility, and affordability is a necessity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate two newly developed diagnostic tools that may satisfy these criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 250 specimens, including 170 PCV2-positive and 80 PCV2-negative samples. The standard diagnosis and cycle threshold (Ct) values were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Then, two point-of-care (POC) diagnostic platforms, convective polymerase chain reaction (cPCR, qualitative assay: positive or negative results are shown) and EZtargex (quantitative assay: Ct values are shown), were examined and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of cPCR were 88.23% and 100%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of EZtargex were 87.65% and 100%, respectively. These assays also showed excellent concordance compared with the qPCR assay (κ = 0.828 for cPCR and κ = 0.820 for EZtargex). The statistical analysis showed a great diagnostic power of the EZtargex assay to discriminate between samples with different levels of positivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two point-of-care diagnostic platforms are accurate, rapid, convenient and require little training for PCV2 diagnosis. These POC platforms can discriminate viral loads to predict the clinical status of the animals. The current study provided evidence that these diagnostics were applicable with high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PCV2 infection in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":17557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.23323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection is ubiquitous around the world. Diagnosis of the porcine circovirus-associated disease requires clinic-pathological elements together with the quantification of viral loads. Furthermore, given pig farms in regions lacking access to sufficient laboratory equipment, developing diagnostic devices with high accuracy, accessibility, and affordability is a necessity.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate two newly developed diagnostic tools that may satisfy these criteria.

Methods: We collected 250 specimens, including 170 PCV2-positive and 80 PCV2-negative samples. The standard diagnosis and cycle threshold (Ct) values were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Then, two point-of-care (POC) diagnostic platforms, convective polymerase chain reaction (cPCR, qualitative assay: positive or negative results are shown) and EZtargex (quantitative assay: Ct values are shown), were examined and analyzed.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of cPCR were 88.23% and 100%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of EZtargex were 87.65% and 100%, respectively. These assays also showed excellent concordance compared with the qPCR assay (κ = 0.828 for cPCR and κ = 0.820 for EZtargex). The statistical analysis showed a great diagnostic power of the EZtargex assay to discriminate between samples with different levels of positivity.

Conclusions: The two point-of-care diagnostic platforms are accurate, rapid, convenient and require little training for PCV2 diagnosis. These POC platforms can discriminate viral loads to predict the clinical status of the animals. The current study provided evidence that these diagnostics were applicable with high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PCV2 infection in the field.

实施用于快速检测猪圆环病毒 2 型的护理点平台。
背景:猪圆环病毒 2 型 (PCV2) 感染在世界各地无处不在。猪圆环病毒相关疾病的诊断需要临床病理学要素和病毒载量定量。此外,由于一些地区的养猪场缺乏足够的实验室设备,因此有必要开发精确度高、方便使用且价格合理的诊断设备:本研究旨在调查两种新开发的诊断工具,它们可能符合上述标准:我们收集了 250 份样本,包括 170 份 PCV2 阳性样本和 80 份 PCV2 阴性样本。通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)确定了标准诊断和周期阈值(Ct)。然后,对对流聚合酶链反应(cPCR,定性检测:显示阳性或阴性结果)和 EZtargex(定量检测:显示 Ct 值)这两种护理点(POC)诊断平台进行了检查和分析:结果:cPCR 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.23% 和 100%;EZtargex 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 87.65% 和 100%。与 qPCR 检测相比,这些检测方法也显示出极好的一致性(cPCR κ = 0.828,EZtargex κ = 0.820)。统计分析显示,EZtargex 检测方法在区分不同阳性水平的样本方面具有很强的诊断能力:结论:这两种床旁诊断平台在 PCV2 诊断方面准确、快速、方便,而且几乎不需要培训。这些 POC 平台可以区分病毒载量,从而预测动物的临床状况。目前的研究证明,这些诊断方法在现场诊断 PCV2 感染时具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Science
Journal of Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Science (J Vet Sci) is devoted to the advancement and dissemination of scientific knowledge concerning veterinary sciences and related academic disciplines. It is an international journal indexed in the Thomson Scientific Web of Science, SCI-EXPANDED, Sci Search, BIOSIS Previews, Biological Abstracts, Focus on: Veterinary Science & Medicine, Zoological Record, PubMed /MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Pubmed Central, CAB Abstracts / Index Veterinarius, EBSCO, AGRIS and AGRICOLA. This journal published in English by the Korean Society of Veterinary Science (KSVS) being distributed worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信