Knowledge and Attitude about Labor Epidural Analgesia among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic.

Q3 Medicine
Bashu Dev Parajuli, Megha Koirala, Pankaj Joshi, Neeta Katuwal, Amit Shrestha, Shreejana Singh, Suniti Rawal, Anil Shrestha
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitude about Labor Epidural Analgesia among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic.","authors":"Bashu Dev Parajuli, Megha Koirala, Pankaj Joshi, Neeta Katuwal, Amit Shrestha, Shreejana Singh, Suniti Rawal, Anil Shrestha","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v21i4.4862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labour pain is one of the most painful experiences that a woman faces in her lifetime. There are various options for labour pain management. Epidural analgesia is the gold standard method for pain management during labour. In developing and under-developed countries there are many challenges to provide this service, a very important one being knowledge about epidural analgesia among the parturients and the physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among 384 pregnant women attending Antenatal clinic of a tertiary level teaching hospital using pretested structured questionnaire prepared by a team of anaesthesiologists and obstetricians. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used. The data was analysed by using SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 384 pregnant women, only 29.4% had knowledge about some form of labour analgesia techniques and only 16% of the participants were aware of labour epidural analgesia. Also, only 6.2% were aware that epidural service is available at our hospital. Regarding acceptance, only 42.4% were willing to use epidural analgesia in their present pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study findings revealed that a significant number of participants had very limited knowledge about labour epidural analgesia and were also unaware of the availability of the service in our hospital. Educational programs need to be provided to all the pregnant women for enhancement of knowledge and awareness about epidural labour analgesia to increase its acceptability among them.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"21 4","pages":"623-628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v21i4.4862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Labour pain is one of the most painful experiences that a woman faces in her lifetime. There are various options for labour pain management. Epidural analgesia is the gold standard method for pain management during labour. In developing and under-developed countries there are many challenges to provide this service, a very important one being knowledge about epidural analgesia among the parturients and the physicians.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among 384 pregnant women attending Antenatal clinic of a tertiary level teaching hospital using pretested structured questionnaire prepared by a team of anaesthesiologists and obstetricians. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used. The data was analysed by using SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used for analysis.

Results: Of the 384 pregnant women, only 29.4% had knowledge about some form of labour analgesia techniques and only 16% of the participants were aware of labour epidural analgesia. Also, only 6.2% were aware that epidural service is available at our hospital. Regarding acceptance, only 42.4% were willing to use epidural analgesia in their present pregnancy.

Conclusions: The present study findings revealed that a significant number of participants had very limited knowledge about labour epidural analgesia and were also unaware of the availability of the service in our hospital. Educational programs need to be provided to all the pregnant women for enhancement of knowledge and awareness about epidural labour analgesia to increase its acceptability among them.

产前门诊孕妇对分娩硬膜外镇痛的认识和态度。
背景:分娩疼痛是妇女一生中面临的最痛苦的经历之一。分娩镇痛有多种选择。硬膜外镇痛是分娩镇痛的黄金标准方法。在发展中国家和欠发达国家,提供这种服务面临许多挑战,其中一个非常重要的挑战是产妇和医生对硬膜外镇痛的了解:在一家三级教学医院的产前门诊中,对 384 名孕妇进行了前瞻性横断面研究,使用的是由麻醉师和产科医生团队准备的、经过预先测试的结构化问卷。采用了非概率目的性抽样技术。数据使用 SPSS 20.0 版进行分析。分析采用了描述性和推断性统计方法:在 384 名孕妇中,只有 29.4% 的人了解某种形式的分娩镇痛技术,只有 16% 的人知道分娩硬膜外镇痛。此外,只有 6.2% 的人知道本医院提供硬膜外镇痛服务。在接受度方面,只有 42.4% 的人愿意在本次妊娠中使用硬膜外镇痛:本研究结果显示,相当多的参与者对分娩硬膜外镇痛的了解非常有限,而且也不知道本医院提供这种服务。有必要为所有孕妇提供教育计划,以提高她们对硬膜外分娩镇痛的了解和认识,从而增加其接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信