Parasite infestation patterns differ between ticks and chigger mites on two rodent host species in Taiwan.

IF 1.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Experimental and Applied Acarology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s10493-024-00918-3
Chi-Chien Kuo, Jing-Lun Huang, Hsi-Chieh Wang
{"title":"Parasite infestation patterns differ between ticks and chigger mites on two rodent host species in Taiwan.","authors":"Chi-Chien Kuo, Jing-Lun Huang, Hsi-Chieh Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10493-024-00918-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parasites are typically concentrated on a few host individuals, and identifying the mechanisms underlying aggregated distribution can facilitate a more targeted control of parasites. We investigated the infestation patterns of hard ticks and chigger mites on two rodent species, the striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius, and the lesser ricefield rat, Rattus losea, in Taiwan. We also explored abiotic and biotic factors that were important in explaining variation in the abundance of ticks and chiggers on rodent hosts. Ticks were more aggregated than chiggers on both rodent species. Factors important for the variation in parasitic loads, especially biotic factors, largely differed between ticks and chiggers. Variation partitioning analyses revealed that a larger proportion of variation in chiggers than in ticks can be explained, especially by abiotic factors. If, as proposed, the higher number of parasites in males is due to a larger range area or immunity being suppressed by testosterone, when A. agrarius males host more ticks, they are expected to also host more chiggers, given that chiggers adopt a similar host finding approach to that of ticks. Instead, the similar abundance of chiggers in male and female A. agrarius implies that a large home range or suppressed immunity does not predispose males to inevitably host more parasites. More variations were explained by abiotic than biotic factors, suggesting that controlling practices are more likely to be successful by focusing on factors related to the environment instead of host traits. Our study indicated that the extent of parasitism is rarely determined by a sole factor, but is an outcome of complex interactions among animal physiology, animal behavior, characteristics of parasites, and the environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12088,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Applied Acarology","volume":" ","pages":"35-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Applied Acarology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00918-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parasites are typically concentrated on a few host individuals, and identifying the mechanisms underlying aggregated distribution can facilitate a more targeted control of parasites. We investigated the infestation patterns of hard ticks and chigger mites on two rodent species, the striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius, and the lesser ricefield rat, Rattus losea, in Taiwan. We also explored abiotic and biotic factors that were important in explaining variation in the abundance of ticks and chiggers on rodent hosts. Ticks were more aggregated than chiggers on both rodent species. Factors important for the variation in parasitic loads, especially biotic factors, largely differed between ticks and chiggers. Variation partitioning analyses revealed that a larger proportion of variation in chiggers than in ticks can be explained, especially by abiotic factors. If, as proposed, the higher number of parasites in males is due to a larger range area or immunity being suppressed by testosterone, when A. agrarius males host more ticks, they are expected to also host more chiggers, given that chiggers adopt a similar host finding approach to that of ticks. Instead, the similar abundance of chiggers in male and female A. agrarius implies that a large home range or suppressed immunity does not predispose males to inevitably host more parasites. More variations were explained by abiotic than biotic factors, suggesting that controlling practices are more likely to be successful by focusing on factors related to the environment instead of host traits. Our study indicated that the extent of parasitism is rarely determined by a sole factor, but is an outcome of complex interactions among animal physiology, animal behavior, characteristics of parasites, and the environments.

Abstract Image

台湾两种啮齿动物宿主上的蜱和恙螨寄生虫侵染模式不同。
寄生虫通常会集中在少数宿主个体上,因此确定寄生虫聚集分布的机制有助于更有针对性地控制寄生虫。我们研究了硬蜱和恙螨在台湾两种啮齿类动物--条纹田鼠(Apodemus agrarius)和小田鼠(Rattus losea)--上的侵扰模式。我们还探讨了对解释蜱和恙螨在啮齿动物宿主上的丰度变化具有重要意义的非生物和生物因素。与恙虫相比,蜱虫在两种啮齿动物上的聚集程度更高。造成寄生虫数量变化的重要因素,尤其是生物因素,在蜱和恙螨之间存在很大差异。变异分区分析表明,恙虫的变异比蜱虫的变异有更大的比例可以解释,尤其是非生物因素。如果正如所提出的那样,雄性寄生虫数量较多是由于其活动范围较大或免疫力受到睾酮的抑制,那么当雄性A. agrarius寄生更多的蜱时,它们也会寄生更多的恙虫,因为恙虫采用的寻找宿主的方法与蜱类似。相反,雄性和雌性A. agrarius的恙虫数量相似,这意味着大的家庭范围或免疫力低下并不会使雄性A. agrarius不可避免地寄生更多的寄生虫。非生物因素比生物因素能解释更多的变化,这表明,如果把重点放在与环境相关的因素上,而不是寄主特性上,控制方法更有可能取得成功。我们的研究表明,寄生虫的寄生程度很少由单一因素决定,而是动物生理、动物行为、寄生虫特征和环境之间复杂相互作用的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Applied Acarology publishes peer-reviewed original papers describing advances in basic and applied research on mites and ticks. Coverage encompasses all Acari, including those of environmental, agricultural, medical and veterinary importance, and all the ways in which they interact with other organisms (plants, arthropods and other animals). The subject matter draws upon a wide variety of disciplines, including evolutionary biology, ecology, epidemiology, physiology, biochemistry, toxicology, immunology, genetics, molecular biology and pest management sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信