Endocannabinoids and Stress-Related Neurospsychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Basal Concentrations and Response to Acute Psychosocial Stress.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1089/can.2023.0246
Leah C Gowatch, Julia M Evanski, Samantha L Ely, Clara G Zundel, Amanpreet Bhogal, Carmen Carpenter, MacKenna M Shampine, Emilie O'Mara, Raegan Mazurka, Jeanne Barcelona, Leah M Mayo, Hilary A Marusak
{"title":"Endocannabinoids and Stress-Related Neurospsychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Basal Concentrations and Response to Acute Psychosocial Stress.","authors":"Leah C Gowatch, Julia M Evanski, Samantha L Ely, Clara G Zundel, Amanpreet Bhogal, Carmen Carpenter, MacKenna M Shampine, Emilie O'Mara, Raegan Mazurka, Jeanne Barcelona, Leah M Mayo, Hilary A Marusak","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid (eCB) system is implicated in various stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders (SRDs), including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, our objectives were to characterize circulating anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) concentrations at rest and in response to acute laboratory-based psychosocial stress in individuals with SRDs and without (controls). Our primary aims were to assess the effects of acute psychosocial stress on eCB concentrations in controls (Aim 1), compare baseline (prestress) eCB concentrations between individuals with SRDs and controls (Aim 2), and explore differential eCB responses to acute psychosocial stress in individuals with SRDs compared with controls (Aim 3). <b>Methods:</b> On June 8, 2023, a comprehensive review of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database was conducted to identify original articles meeting inclusion criteria. A total of 1072, 1341, and 400 articles were screened for inclusion in Aims 1, 2, and 3, respectively. <b>Results:</b> Aim 1, comprised of seven studies in controls, revealed that most studies reported stress-related increases in AEA (86%, with 43% reporting statistical significance) and 2-AG (83%, though none were statistically significant except for one study in saliva). However, meta-analyses did not support these patterns (<i>p'</i>s>0.05). Aim 2, with 20 studies, revealed that most studies reported higher baseline concentrations of both AEA (63%, with 16% reporting statistical significance) and 2-AG (60%, with 10% reporting statistical significance) in individuals with SRDs compared with controls. Meta-analyses confirmed these findings (<i>p'</i>s<0.05). Aim 3, which included three studies, had only one study that reported statistically different stress-related changes in 2-AG (but not AEA) between individuals with PTSD (decrease) and controls (increase), which was supported by the meta-analysis (<i>p</i><0.001). Meta-analyses showed heterogeneity across studies and aims (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>=14-97%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite substantial heterogeneity in study characteristics, samples, and methodologies, consistent patterns emerged, including elevated baseline AEA and 2-AG in individuals with SRDs compared with controls, as well as smaller stress-related increases in 2-AG in individuals with SRDs compared with controls. To consider eCBs as reliable biomarkers and potential intervention targets for SRDs, standardized research approaches are needed to clarify the complex relationships between eCBs, SRDs, and psychosocial stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"1217-1234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2023.0246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid (eCB) system is implicated in various stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders (SRDs), including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, our objectives were to characterize circulating anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) concentrations at rest and in response to acute laboratory-based psychosocial stress in individuals with SRDs and without (controls). Our primary aims were to assess the effects of acute psychosocial stress on eCB concentrations in controls (Aim 1), compare baseline (prestress) eCB concentrations between individuals with SRDs and controls (Aim 2), and explore differential eCB responses to acute psychosocial stress in individuals with SRDs compared with controls (Aim 3). Methods: On June 8, 2023, a comprehensive review of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database was conducted to identify original articles meeting inclusion criteria. A total of 1072, 1341, and 400 articles were screened for inclusion in Aims 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Results: Aim 1, comprised of seven studies in controls, revealed that most studies reported stress-related increases in AEA (86%, with 43% reporting statistical significance) and 2-AG (83%, though none were statistically significant except for one study in saliva). However, meta-analyses did not support these patterns (p's>0.05). Aim 2, with 20 studies, revealed that most studies reported higher baseline concentrations of both AEA (63%, with 16% reporting statistical significance) and 2-AG (60%, with 10% reporting statistical significance) in individuals with SRDs compared with controls. Meta-analyses confirmed these findings (p's<0.05). Aim 3, which included three studies, had only one study that reported statistically different stress-related changes in 2-AG (but not AEA) between individuals with PTSD (decrease) and controls (increase), which was supported by the meta-analysis (p<0.001). Meta-analyses showed heterogeneity across studies and aims (I2=14-97%). Conclusion: Despite substantial heterogeneity in study characteristics, samples, and methodologies, consistent patterns emerged, including elevated baseline AEA and 2-AG in individuals with SRDs compared with controls, as well as smaller stress-related increases in 2-AG in individuals with SRDs compared with controls. To consider eCBs as reliable biomarkers and potential intervention targets for SRDs, standardized research approaches are needed to clarify the complex relationships between eCBs, SRDs, and psychosocial stress.

内源性大麻素与压力相关的神经精神障碍:基础浓度和对急性社会心理应激反应的系统回顾和元分析》(A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Basal Concentrations and Response to Acute Psychosocial Stress)。
背景:内源性大麻素(eCB)系统失调与焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等各种应激相关神经精神障碍(SRDs)有关。在这项系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们的目标是描述SRD患者和非SRD患者(对照组)在静息状态下和对急性实验室社会心理应激反应时循环中的anandamide(AEA)和2-arachidonoylglycerol(2-AG)浓度的特征。我们的主要目的是评估急性社会心理应激对对照组 eCB 浓度的影响(目标 1),比较 SRD 患者和对照组之间的基线(应激前)eCB 浓度(目标 2),并探索 SRD 患者与对照组相比对急性社会心理应激的不同 eCB 反应(目标 3)。研究方法2023年6月8日,我们对MEDLINE(PubMed)数据库进行了全面审查,以确定符合纳入标准的原创文章。共筛选出 1072 篇、1341 篇和 400 篇文章,分别纳入目标 1、2 和 3。研究结果目的 1 包括七项对照组研究,结果显示,大多数研究都报告了与压力有关的 AEA(86%,其中 43% 具有统计学意义)和 2-AG 的增加(83%,但除一项唾液研究外,其他研究均不具有统计学意义)。然而,荟萃分析并不支持这些模式(P>0.05)。目标 2 有 20 项研究显示,与对照组相比,大多数研究报告称 SRD 患者体内 AEA(63%,其中 16% 具有统计学意义)和 2-AG (60%,其中 10% 具有统计学意义)的基线浓度较高。元分析证实了这些发现(p'spI2=14-97%)。结论:尽管在研究特征、样本和方法上存在很大的异质性,但还是出现了一致的模式,包括与对照组相比,SRD 患者的基线 AEA 和 2-AG 升高,以及与对照组相比,SRD 患者的 2-AG 因压力而增加的幅度较小。要将 eCBs 视为可靠的生物标志物和 SRDs 的潜在干预目标,需要采用标准化的研究方法来阐明 eCBs、SRDs 和社会心理压力之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信