Use of Implementation Strategies to Promote the Uptake of Knee Osteoarthritis Practice Guidelines and Improve Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Michelle M. Ramirez, Rebecca Fillipo, Kelli D. Allen, Amanda E. Nelson, Lesley A. Skalla, Connor D. Drake, Maggie E. Horn
{"title":"Use of Implementation Strategies to Promote the Uptake of Knee Osteoarthritis Practice Guidelines and Improve Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review","authors":"Michelle M. Ramirez,&nbsp;Rebecca Fillipo,&nbsp;Kelli D. Allen,&nbsp;Amanda E. Nelson,&nbsp;Lesley A. Skalla,&nbsp;Connor D. Drake,&nbsp;Maggie E. Horn","doi":"10.1002/acr.25353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Translation of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to practice remains suboptimal. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to describe the use of implementation strategies to promote KOA CPG–recommended care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Medline (via PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 23, 2023, and the search was subsequently updated and expanded on January 16, 2024. Implementation strategies were mapped per the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria. The review was registered prospectively (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023402383).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nineteen studies were included in the final review. All (100% [n = 4]) studies that included the domains of “provide interactive assistance,” “train and educate stakeholders” (89% [n = 16]), “engage consumers” (87% [n = 13]), and “support clinicians” (79% [n = 11]) showed a change to provider adherence. Studies that showed a change to disability included the domains of “train and educate stakeholders,” “engage consumers,” and “adapt and tailor to context.” Studies that used the domains “train and educate stakeholders,” “engage consumers,” and “support clinicians” showed a change in pain and quality of life. Most studies had a low to moderate RoB.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation strategies have the potential to impact clinician uptake of CPGs and patient-reported outcomes. The implementation context, using an active learning strategy with a patient partner, restructuring funding models, and integrating taxonomies to tailor multifaceted strategies should be prioritized. Further experimental research is recommended to determine which implementation strategies are most effective.</p>\n \n <div>\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.25353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Translation of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to practice remains suboptimal. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to describe the use of implementation strategies to promote KOA CPG–recommended care.

Methods

Medline (via PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 23, 2023, and the search was subsequently updated and expanded on January 16, 2024. Implementation strategies were mapped per the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria. The review was registered prospectively (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023402383).

Results

Nineteen studies were included in the final review. All (100% [n = 4]) studies that included the domains of “provide interactive assistance,” “train and educate stakeholders” (89% [n = 16]), “engage consumers” (87% [n = 13]), and “support clinicians” (79% [n = 11]) showed a change to provider adherence. Studies that showed a change to disability included the domains of “train and educate stakeholders,” “engage consumers,” and “adapt and tailor to context.” Studies that used the domains “train and educate stakeholders,” “engage consumers,” and “support clinicians” showed a change in pain and quality of life. Most studies had a low to moderate RoB.

Conclusion

Implementation strategies have the potential to impact clinician uptake of CPGs and patient-reported outcomes. The implementation context, using an active learning strategy with a patient partner, restructuring funding models, and integrating taxonomies to tailor multifaceted strategies should be prioritized. Further experimental research is recommended to determine which implementation strategies are most effective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用实施策略促进膝关节骨性关节炎实践指南的采用并改善患者疗效:系统回顾。
目的:膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)临床实践指南(CPG)在实践中的转化仍不理想。本系统性综述的主要目的是描述如何使用实施策略来推广 KOA CPG 推荐的护理方法:方法:检索了从开始到 2023 年 2 月 23 日的 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science,随后于 2024 年 1 月 16 日进行了更新和扩展。根据 "实施变革的专家建议 "分类法对实施策略进行了映射。采用 Cochrane 有效实践和护理组织标准对偏倚风险 (RoB) 进行了评估。该综述进行了前瞻性注册(CRD42023402383):19项研究被纳入最终综述。包括提供互动协助、培训和教育利益相关者(89%(n=18))、吸引消费者(87%(n=15))和支持临床医生(79%(n=14))等领域的所有研究(100%(n=4))都报告了提供者依从性的改变。报告对残疾情况有所改变的研究包括对利益相关者进行培训和教育、让消费者参与以及根据具体情况进行调整和定制。对利益相关者进行培训和教育、让消费者参与以及支持临床医生的研究报告了疼痛和生活质量方面的变化。大多数研究的 RoB 值为中低:实施策略有可能影响临床医生对 CPG 的接受程度和患者报告结果(PROs)。应优先考虑实施环境、与患者伙伴一起使用主动学习策略、重组资助模式以及整合分类标准以定制多方面的策略。建议进一步开展实验研究,以确定哪些实施策略最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信