Association of Race and Ethnicity With High Longevity Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Under the US Kidney Allocation System.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nour W Asfour, Kevin C Zhang, Jessica Lu, Peter P Reese, Milda Saunders, Monica Peek, Molly White, Govind Persad, William F Parker
{"title":"Association of Race and Ethnicity With High Longevity Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Under the US Kidney Allocation System.","authors":"Nour W Asfour, Kevin C Zhang, Jessica Lu, Peter P Reese, Milda Saunders, Monica Peek, Molly White, Govind Persad, William F Parker","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>The US Kidney Allocation System (KAS) prioritizes candidates with a≤20% estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) to receive high-longevity kidneys defined by a≤20% Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Use of EPTS in the KAS deprioritizes candidates with older age, diabetes, and longer dialysis durations. We assessed whether this use also disadvantages race and ethnicity minority candidates, who are younger but more likely to have diabetes and longer durations of kidney failure requiring dialysis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting & participants: </strong>Adult candidates for and recipients of kidney transplantation represented in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from January 2015 through December 2020.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Age-adjusted assignment to≤20% EPTS, transplantation of a≤20% KDPI kidney, and posttransplant survival in longevity-matched recipients by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Analytic approach: </strong>Multivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray competing risks survival analysis, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 199,444 candidates (7% Asian, 29% Black, 19% Hispanic or Latino, and 43% White) listed for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Non-White candidates had significantly higher rates of diabetes, longer dialysis duration, and were younger than White candidates. Adjusted for age, Asian, Black, and Hispanic or Latino candidates had significantly lower odds of having a ETPS score of≤20% (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.91], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.50-0.54], and 0.49 [95% CI, 0.47-0.51]), and were less likely to receive a≤20% KDPI kidney (sub-hazard ratio, 0.70 [0.66-0.75], 0.89 [0.87-0.92], and 0.73 [0.71-0.76]) compared with White candidates. Among recipients with≤20% EPTS scores transplanted with a≤20% KDPI deceased donor kidney, Asian and Hispanic recipients had lower posttransplant mortality (HR, 0.45 [0.27-0.77] and 0.63 [0.47-0.86], respectively) and Black recipients had higher but not statistically significant posttransplant mortality (HR, 1.22 [0.99-1.52]) compared with White recipients.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Provider reported race and ethnicity data and 5-year post transplant follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The US kidney allocation system is less likely to identify race and ethnicity minority candidates as having a≤20% EPTS score, which triggers allocation of high-longevity deceased donor kidneys. These findings should inform the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network about how to remedy the race and ethnicity disparities introduced through KAS's current approach of allocating allografts with longer predicted longevity to recipients with longer estimated posttransplant survival.</p><p><strong>Plain-language summary: </strong>The US Kidney Allocation System prioritizes giving high-longevity, high-quality kidneys to patients on the waiting list who have a high estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) score. EPTS is calculated based on the patient's age, whether the patient has diabetes, whether the patient has a history of organ transplantation, and the number of years spent on dialysis. Our analyses show that Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latino patients were less likely to receive high-longevity kidneys compared with White patients, despite having similar or better posttransplant survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & objective: The US Kidney Allocation System (KAS) prioritizes candidates with a≤20% estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) to receive high-longevity kidneys defined by a≤20% Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Use of EPTS in the KAS deprioritizes candidates with older age, diabetes, and longer dialysis durations. We assessed whether this use also disadvantages race and ethnicity minority candidates, who are younger but more likely to have diabetes and longer durations of kidney failure requiring dialysis.

Study design: Observational cohort study.

Setting & participants: Adult candidates for and recipients of kidney transplantation represented in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from January 2015 through December 2020.

Exposure: Race and ethnicity.

Outcome: Age-adjusted assignment to≤20% EPTS, transplantation of a≤20% KDPI kidney, and posttransplant survival in longevity-matched recipients by race and ethnicity.

Analytic approach: Multivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray competing risks survival analysis, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.

Results: The cohort included 199,444 candidates (7% Asian, 29% Black, 19% Hispanic or Latino, and 43% White) listed for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Non-White candidates had significantly higher rates of diabetes, longer dialysis duration, and were younger than White candidates. Adjusted for age, Asian, Black, and Hispanic or Latino candidates had significantly lower odds of having a ETPS score of≤20% (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.91], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.50-0.54], and 0.49 [95% CI, 0.47-0.51]), and were less likely to receive a≤20% KDPI kidney (sub-hazard ratio, 0.70 [0.66-0.75], 0.89 [0.87-0.92], and 0.73 [0.71-0.76]) compared with White candidates. Among recipients with≤20% EPTS scores transplanted with a≤20% KDPI deceased donor kidney, Asian and Hispanic recipients had lower posttransplant mortality (HR, 0.45 [0.27-0.77] and 0.63 [0.47-0.86], respectively) and Black recipients had higher but not statistically significant posttransplant mortality (HR, 1.22 [0.99-1.52]) compared with White recipients.

Limitations: Provider reported race and ethnicity data and 5-year post transplant follow-up period.

Conclusions: The US kidney allocation system is less likely to identify race and ethnicity minority candidates as having a≤20% EPTS score, which triggers allocation of high-longevity deceased donor kidneys. These findings should inform the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network about how to remedy the race and ethnicity disparities introduced through KAS's current approach of allocating allografts with longer predicted longevity to recipients with longer estimated posttransplant survival.

Plain-language summary: The US Kidney Allocation System prioritizes giving high-longevity, high-quality kidneys to patients on the waiting list who have a high estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) score. EPTS is calculated based on the patient's age, whether the patient has diabetes, whether the patient has a history of organ transplantation, and the number of years spent on dialysis. Our analyses show that Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latino patients were less likely to receive high-longevity kidneys compared with White patients, despite having similar or better posttransplant survival outcomes.

在美国肾脏分配系统下,种族和民族与高寿命死亡捐献者肾脏移植的关系。
理由与目标:美国肾脏分配系统(KAS)优先考虑移植后估计存活率(EPTS)≤20%的肾脏捐献者,其肾脏捐献者档案指数(KDPI)≤20%的肾脏捐献者可获得高寿命肾脏。在 KAS 中使用 EPTS 会降低年龄较大、患有糖尿病和透析时间较长的候选者的优先级。研究设计:观察性队列研究:观察性队列研究:研究设计:观察性队列研究.环境:& 参与者:2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在肾移植受者科学登记处登记的肾移植成年候选者和受者.暴露:& 种族和民族.结果:& 种族和民族:种族和民族:分析方法:多变量逻辑回归:分析方法:多变量逻辑回归、Fine-Gray竞争风险生存分析、Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例危害法:队列中包括 199,444 名列入死亡供体肾移植名单的候选者(7% 亚裔、29% 黑人、19% 西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔、43% 白人)。与白人相比,非白人患者的糖尿病患病率明显更高、透析时间更长且更年轻。经年龄调整后,亚裔、黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔候选者的 ETPS 评分≤20% 的几率明显较低(OR 0.86,[0.81,0.91],0.52 [0.50,0.54],0.49,[0.47,0.51]),与白人候选者相比,接受≤20% KDPI 肾脏的可能性较低(subHR 0.70 [0.66,0.75],0.89 [0.87,0.92] 和 0.73 [0.71,0.76])。与白人受者相比,EPTS评分≤20%的受者移植了KDPI≤20%的死者供肾,其中亚裔和西班牙裔受者的移植后死亡率较低(HR为0.45 [0.27,0.77] 和0.63 [0.47,0.86]),黑人受者的移植后死亡率较高,但无统计学意义(HR为1.22 [0.99,1.52]):局限性:提供者报告的种族族裔数据和移植后5年随访期:结论:美国肾脏分配系统不太可能将少数种族候选者识别为EPTS得分≤20%的人,而EPTS得分≤20%会触发高寿命已故捐献者肾脏的分配。这些研究结果将为 OPTN 提供信息,说明如何纠正 KAS 目前将预测寿命较长的同种异体移植物分配给估计移植后存活期较长的受者的方法所带来的种族/民族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信