Effect of Absenteeism on Student's Performance in Different Components of Examinations - A Comparison of Online Verses Offline Teaching.

Q2 Medicine
Zaheera Saadia, Khalid Nasrallah, Aseel Ibrahim Alzuwaydi, Hossam Omer Hamid
{"title":"Effect of Absenteeism on Student's Performance in Different Components of Examinations - A Comparison of Online Verses Offline Teaching.","authors":"Zaheera Saadia, Khalid Nasrallah, Aseel Ibrahim Alzuwaydi, Hossam Omer Hamid","doi":"10.5455/aim.2024.32.47-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The In online learning, more responsibility is shifted towards students in learning according to their needs. However there is a need to assess which component of teaching can be shifted online for future hybrid teachings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the students' performance in difference components of the exams and compare them in online vs offline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a quantitative study comparing onsite and online groups academic performance in individual components of assessment for a duration of 6 months. Estimates were reported per standard deviation (SD) increase or decrease. Taking absenteeism rate as a predictor, models with group and gender on their own was fitted in univariable models, before including all three predictors (absenteeism rate, group and gender) in the final model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who studied online, had a 0.49SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001), each SD increase in the absenteeism rate was associated with a 0.26SD lower overall score, and this was significant, p < 0.001. While comparing both groups in MCQ part students who studied online, had a 0.6SD higher grade than their counterparts (p < 0.001), also in continuous assessment students who studied online, had a 0.49 SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive effect of the online teaching was clear in the (MCQs) and the final result, while no significant gender variation detected in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":"32 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2024.32.47-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The In online learning, more responsibility is shifted towards students in learning according to their needs. However there is a need to assess which component of teaching can be shifted online for future hybrid teachings.

Objective: This study aims to compare the students' performance in difference components of the exams and compare them in online vs offline.

Methods: It was a quantitative study comparing onsite and online groups academic performance in individual components of assessment for a duration of 6 months. Estimates were reported per standard deviation (SD) increase or decrease. Taking absenteeism rate as a predictor, models with group and gender on their own was fitted in univariable models, before including all three predictors (absenteeism rate, group and gender) in the final model.

Results: Students who studied online, had a 0.49SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001), each SD increase in the absenteeism rate was associated with a 0.26SD lower overall score, and this was significant, p < 0.001. While comparing both groups in MCQ part students who studied online, had a 0.6SD higher grade than their counterparts (p < 0.001), also in continuous assessment students who studied online, had a 0.49 SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Positive effect of the online teaching was clear in the (MCQs) and the final result, while no significant gender variation detected in this study.

旷课对学生不同考试成绩的影响--在线教学与离线教学的比较。
背景:在在线学习中,更多的责任转移到了学生身上,让他们根据自己的需要进行学习。然而,有必要评估教学中的哪些部分可以转移到网上,以便将来进行混合教学:本研究旨在比较学生在不同考试内容中的表现,并比较他们在在线和离线考试中的表现:这是一项定量研究,比较了现场组和在线组在为期 6 个月的单项评估中的学习成绩。每个标准差(SD)的增减都有估计值。将旷课率作为预测因素,在单变量模型中单独加入小组和性别,然后在最终模型中加入所有三个预测因素(旷课率、小组和性别):在线学习的学生比实际参加学习的学生成绩高出 0.49 个标准差(P < 0.001),旷课率每增加一个标准差,总成绩就会降低 0.26 个标准差,且差异显著(P < 0.001)。两组学生在 MCQ 部分的成绩比较中,在线学习的学生比实际参加学习的学生高出 0.6 个标准差(p < 0.001);在连续性评价中,在线学习的学生比实际参加学习的学生高出 0.49 个标准差(p < 0.001):本研究未发现明显的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信