Effects of Continuous Quality Improvement on Complication Rate and Treatment Outcome of Extremely Premature Infants.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yang Chen, Tingting Cheng, Huaping Zhu, Shiwen Xia
{"title":"Effects of Continuous Quality Improvement on Complication Rate and Treatment Outcome of Extremely Premature Infants.","authors":"Yang Chen, Tingting Cheng, Huaping Zhu, Shiwen Xia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremely premature infants (EPIs) are those less than 32 weeks of gestational age. Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death and poor prognosis, accounting for 25% of neonatal deaths, with extremely premature births accounting for 50% of all premature deaths. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) improves patient outcomes by changing and optimizing clinical practice including increasing participation of neonatologists in prenatal consultation, maintenance of normal body temperature in preterm infants, early use of pulmonary surfactant, reduction of mechanical ventilation time and intensive breastfeeding to reduce clinically avoidable adverse events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The risk of death and disability is high for very preterm infants, with a mortality rate of 30-50% and a risk of at least 20-50% for survivors. This study aimed to investigate the effect of CQI on the incidence of complications and treatment outcomes in very preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 140 EPIs born in our hospital and transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit between August 1, 2020, and July 31, 2022, were enrolled. The EPIs were divided into two groups: before improvement (n=79, 56.4%) and after improvement (n=61, 43.6%) according to the week of birth, and the gestational age ranged from 26 weeks to 26 weeks 6 days into the 26 weeks group.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>From August 2021, the hospital implemented the CQI method, which included neonatologists' participation in consultations before birth, the care of a professionally trained resuscitation team after birth, and the introduction of transport heating tanks and ventilators during transport.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>(1) Apgar score (2) body weight (3) duration of invasive ventilation (4) length of stay (5) treatment expense (6) incidence of complications and (7) survival rate of EPIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of CQI methods resulted in significant improvements in body weight (1305 g vs 1404 g) and duration of invasive ventilation (4.64 d vs 7.40 d) in EPIs (P = .036 and P = .040), reduced the time of invasive mechanical ventilation decreased significantly, from 7.4 days to 4.64 days (P < .01), increased the median temperature of newborn infants (36.2°C vs 35.7°C) (P = 0), increased the proportion of newborn infants with a temperature greater than 36°C (67.2% vs 35.4%) (P < .001), reduced the incidence of complications in EPIs (32.79% vs 45.57%) (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of the CQI approach significantly increases the body temperature, improves the incidence of complications of EPIs, and is conducive to the survival of EPIs. Our study may provide a clinical reference for management of EPIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extremely premature infants (EPIs) are those less than 32 weeks of gestational age. Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death and poor prognosis, accounting for 25% of neonatal deaths, with extremely premature births accounting for 50% of all premature deaths. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) improves patient outcomes by changing and optimizing clinical practice including increasing participation of neonatologists in prenatal consultation, maintenance of normal body temperature in preterm infants, early use of pulmonary surfactant, reduction of mechanical ventilation time and intensive breastfeeding to reduce clinically avoidable adverse events.

Objective: The risk of death and disability is high for very preterm infants, with a mortality rate of 30-50% and a risk of at least 20-50% for survivors. This study aimed to investigate the effect of CQI on the incidence of complications and treatment outcomes in very preterm infants.

Design: This was a retrospective study.

Setting: This study was conducted in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province.

Participants: A total of 140 EPIs born in our hospital and transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit between August 1, 2020, and July 31, 2022, were enrolled. The EPIs were divided into two groups: before improvement (n=79, 56.4%) and after improvement (n=61, 43.6%) according to the week of birth, and the gestational age ranged from 26 weeks to 26 weeks 6 days into the 26 weeks group.

Interventions: From August 2021, the hospital implemented the CQI method, which included neonatologists' participation in consultations before birth, the care of a professionally trained resuscitation team after birth, and the introduction of transport heating tanks and ventilators during transport.

Primary outcome measures: (1) Apgar score (2) body weight (3) duration of invasive ventilation (4) length of stay (5) treatment expense (6) incidence of complications and (7) survival rate of EPIs.

Results: The application of CQI methods resulted in significant improvements in body weight (1305 g vs 1404 g) and duration of invasive ventilation (4.64 d vs 7.40 d) in EPIs (P = .036 and P = .040), reduced the time of invasive mechanical ventilation decreased significantly, from 7.4 days to 4.64 days (P < .01), increased the median temperature of newborn infants (36.2°C vs 35.7°C) (P = 0), increased the proportion of newborn infants with a temperature greater than 36°C (67.2% vs 35.4%) (P < .001), reduced the incidence of complications in EPIs (32.79% vs 45.57%) (P < .05).

Conclusion: The application of the CQI approach significantly increases the body temperature, improves the incidence of complications of EPIs, and is conducive to the survival of EPIs. Our study may provide a clinical reference for management of EPIs.

持续质量改进对极度早产儿并发症发生率和治疗结果的影响。
背景:极早产儿是指胎龄不足 32 周的婴儿。早产是新生儿死亡和预后不良的主要原因,占新生儿死亡的 25%,其中极早产儿占所有早产儿死亡的 50%。持续质量改进(CQI)通过改变和优化临床实践来改善患者预后,包括增加新生儿科医生参与产前咨询、维持早产儿正常体温、尽早使用肺表面活性物质、减少机械通气时间和强化母乳喂养,以减少临床上可避免的不良事件:极早产儿的死亡和残疾风险很高,死亡率为 30%-50%,幸存者的风险至少为 20%-50%。本研究旨在探讨 CQI 对早产儿并发症发生率和治疗效果的影响:设计:这是一项回顾性研究:研究在湖北省妇幼保健院进行:2020年8月1日至2022年7月31日期间在我院出生并转入新生儿重症监护室的早产儿共140例。根据出生周数将EPI分为两组:改善前(n=79,56.4%)和改善后(n=61,43.6%),胎龄从26周到26周6天不等,分为26周组:自2021年8月起,医院实施CQI方法,包括新生儿科医生在产前参与会诊,产后由经过专业培训的复苏团队护理,以及在运输过程中引入运输加热箱和呼吸机:(1) Apgar 评分 (2) 体重 (3) 有创通气时间 (4) 住院时间 (5) 治疗费用 (6) 并发症发生率 (7) EPIs 存活率:应用 CQI 方法后,EPIs 的体重(1305 g vs 1404 g)和有创通气持续时间(4.64 d vs 7.40 d)显著改善(P = .036 和 P = .040),有创机械通气时间显著减少,从 7.4 天减少到 4.64天(P < .01),提高了新生儿体温中位数(36.2°C vs 35.7°C)(P = 0),增加了体温高于36°C的新生儿比例(67.2% vs 35.4%)(P < .001),降低了EPIs的并发症发生率(32.79% vs 45.57%)(P < .05):结论:CQI方法的应用可明显提高体温,改善EPI并发症的发生率,有利于EPI的存活。我们的研究可为 EPIs 的管理提供临床参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信