Improved Wound Healing by Direct Cold Atmospheric Plasma Once or Twice a Week: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Olaf Bakker, Paulien Smits, Chantal van Weersch, Melissa Quaaden, Esther Bruls, Angela van Loon, Joost van der Kleij
{"title":"Improved Wound Healing by Direct Cold Atmospheric Plasma Once or Twice a Week: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers.","authors":"Olaf Bakker, Paulien Smits, Chantal van Weersch, Melissa Quaaden, Esther Bruls, Angela van Loon, Joost van der Kleij","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study compared the effect of two frequencies of direct cold atmospheric plasma (direct-CAP) treatment with standard of care (SOC) alone on healing of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). <b>Approach:</b> Open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04922463) on chronic VLUs at two home care organizations in the Netherlands. All three groups received SOC for 12 weeks or until healing. In addition, treatment groups received direct-CAP once (1× direct-CAP) or twice (2× direct-CAP) a week, at specialized wound care facilities and the patients' residences. Primary outcome was percentage of wounds healed. Secondary outcomes included wound area reduction and adverse events. <b>Results:</b> In total, 46 patients were randomly allocated to receive SOC only (<i>n</i> = 15), SOC + direct-CAP once a week (<i>n</i> = 17), or SOC + direct-CAP twice a week (<i>n</i> = 14). A higher percentage of wounds healed within 12 weeks in the treatment groups 53.3% (1× direct-CAP, <i>p</i> = 0.16) and 61.5% (2× direct-CAP, <i>p</i> = 0.08) versus 25.0% (control). The largest wound area reduction was obtained with 2× direct-CAP (95.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.07), followed by 1× direct-CAP (63.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.58), versus control (52.8%). Absolute wound area reduced significantly compared with baseline in both treatment groups (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), not in control (<i>p</i> = 0.11). No device-related serious adverse events occurred. <b>Innovation:</b> Direct-CAP applied once or twice a week could substantially improve wound healing of VLUs in primary care. <b>Conclusion:</b> Together with other clinical safety and efficacy data, these results support the integration of direct-CAP as a valuable therapy for complex wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the effect of two frequencies of direct cold atmospheric plasma (direct-CAP) treatment with standard of care (SOC) alone on healing of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). Approach: Open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04922463) on chronic VLUs at two home care organizations in the Netherlands. All three groups received SOC for 12 weeks or until healing. In addition, treatment groups received direct-CAP once (1× direct-CAP) or twice (2× direct-CAP) a week, at specialized wound care facilities and the patients' residences. Primary outcome was percentage of wounds healed. Secondary outcomes included wound area reduction and adverse events. Results: In total, 46 patients were randomly allocated to receive SOC only (n = 15), SOC + direct-CAP once a week (n = 17), or SOC + direct-CAP twice a week (n = 14). A higher percentage of wounds healed within 12 weeks in the treatment groups 53.3% (1× direct-CAP, p = 0.16) and 61.5% (2× direct-CAP, p = 0.08) versus 25.0% (control). The largest wound area reduction was obtained with 2× direct-CAP (95.2%, p = 0.07), followed by 1× direct-CAP (63.9%, p = 0.58), versus control (52.8%). Absolute wound area reduced significantly compared with baseline in both treatment groups (p ≤ 0.001), not in control (p = 0.11). No device-related serious adverse events occurred. Innovation: Direct-CAP applied once or twice a week could substantially improve wound healing of VLUs in primary care. Conclusion: Together with other clinical safety and efficacy data, these results support the integration of direct-CAP as a valuable therapy for complex wounds.

每周一次或两次直接冷大气等离子体疗法改善伤口愈合:慢性静脉腿部溃疡随机对照试验。
研究目的本研究比较了两种频率的直接冷等离子体(direct-CAP)治疗与单纯标准护理(SOC)对腿部静脉溃疡(VLU)愈合的影响:方法:荷兰两家家庭护理机构对慢性 VLU 进行的开放标签随机对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04922463)。三组患者均接受为期 12 周的 SOC 治疗,直至痊愈。此外,治疗组每周在专门的伤口护理机构和患者住所接受一次(1 次直接-CAP)或两次(2 次直接-CAP)直接-CAP 治疗。主要结果是伤口愈合的百分比。次要结果包括伤口面积缩小和不良反应:46 名患者被随机分配到只接受 SOC 治疗(15 人)、每周一次 SOC + 直接-CAP(17 人)或每周两次 SOC + 直接-CAP(14 人)。治疗组在 12 周内愈合的伤口比例更高:53.3%(1 次直接-CAP,P=0.16)和 61.5%(2 次直接-CAP,P=0.08)对 25.0%(对照组)。2x direct-CAP(95.2%,p=0.07)与对照组(52.8%)相比,伤口面积减少最多,其次是 1x direct-CAP(63.9%,p=0.58)。与基线相比,两个治疗组的伤口绝对面积都有明显减少(p≤0.001),而对照组没有减少(p=0.11)。没有发生与设备相关的严重不良事件:创新之处:每周使用一到两次的Direct-CAP可大大改善基层医疗机构VLU的伤口愈合:结论:结合其他临床安全性和有效性数据,这些结果支持将直接气囊作为一种治疗复杂伤口的重要疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信