Accuracy of new intraocular lens power calculation formula for short and long eyes using segmental refractive indices

Yukihito Kato, Masahiko Ayaki, Akeno Tamaoki, Yoshiki Tanaka, Kei Ichikawa, Kazuo Ichikawa
{"title":"Accuracy of new intraocular lens power calculation formula for short and long eyes using segmental refractive indices","authors":"Yukihito Kato, Masahiko Ayaki, Akeno Tamaoki, Yoshiki Tanaka, Kei Ichikawa, Kazuo Ichikawa","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of a new intraocular lens power calculation formula using segmental refractive index-based axial length (AL). Setting: Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Japan. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: This study included patients undergoing preoperative examination for cataract surgery with the new Barrett True AL (BTAL) and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formulas using segmental refractive index, and conventional Barrett Universal II (BU II) formula using equivalent refractive index. The predicted refractive error of each formula was compared with the postoperative subjective spherical equivalent. Results: The mean prediction error (MPE) in the short AL group (≤ 22 mm; 44 eyes) was 0.32 ± 0.40 D for BU II, 0.22 ± 0.37 D for BTAL, and 0.10 ± 0.37 D for EVO (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). MPE in the long AL group (≥ 26 mm; 92 eyes) was 0.01 ± 0.32 D for BU II, 0.04 ± 0.32 D for BTAL, and 0.09 ± 0.32 D for EVO (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). In patients with an AL ≥ 28 mm, BU II showed a myopic trend in 57.1% of cases, while BTAL and EVO showed a hyperopic trend in 71.4%. The MPE for patients with an AL ≥ 28 mm was -0.16 ± 0.34 D for BU II, 0.18 ± 0.33 D for BTAL, and 0.16 ± 0.32 D for EVO (<jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: The new EVO and BTAL formulas showed higher accuracy than BU II in short eyes, whereas there was no difference in long eyes.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of a new intraocular lens power calculation formula using segmental refractive index-based axial length (AL). Setting: Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Japan. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: This study included patients undergoing preoperative examination for cataract surgery with the new Barrett True AL (BTAL) and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formulas using segmental refractive index, and conventional Barrett Universal II (BU II) formula using equivalent refractive index. The predicted refractive error of each formula was compared with the postoperative subjective spherical equivalent. Results: The mean prediction error (MPE) in the short AL group (≤ 22 mm; 44 eyes) was 0.32 ± 0.40 D for BU II, 0.22 ± 0.37 D for BTAL, and 0.10 ± 0.37 D for EVO (P < 0.0001). MPE in the long AL group (≥ 26 mm; 92 eyes) was 0.01 ± 0.32 D for BU II, 0.04 ± 0.32 D for BTAL, and 0.09 ± 0.32 D for EVO (P < 0.0001). In patients with an AL ≥ 28 mm, BU II showed a myopic trend in 57.1% of cases, while BTAL and EVO showed a hyperopic trend in 71.4%. The MPE for patients with an AL ≥ 28 mm was -0.16 ± 0.34 D for BU II, 0.18 ± 0.33 D for BTAL, and 0.16 ± 0.32 D for EVO (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The new EVO and BTAL formulas showed higher accuracy than BU II in short eyes, whereas there was no difference in long eyes.
利用节段屈光指数计算长短眼新的眼内晶状体功率公式的准确性
目的: 评估使用基于节段屈光指数的轴向长度(AL)的新型眼内透镜功率计算公式的准确性。地点: 日本名古屋中京眼科医院日本名古屋中京眼科医院。设计:回顾性观察研究:回顾性观察研究。方 法:术前检查研究对象包括接受白内障手术术前检查的患者,他们使用了新的巴雷特真AL(BTAL)和Emmetropia Verifying Optical(EVO)公式(使用节段屈光指数),以及传统的巴雷特通用II(BU II)公式(使用等效屈光指数)。将每种公式预测的屈光不正与术后主观球面等值进行比较。结果:短AL组(≤ 22 mm; 44眼)的平均预测误差(MPE)为:BU II 0.32 ± 0.40 D,BTAL 0.22 ± 0.37 D,EVO 0.10 ± 0.37 D (P < 0.0001)。长 AL 组(≥ 26 mm;92 眼)的 MPE 为:BU II 0.01 ± 0.32 D,BTAL 0.04 ± 0.32 D,EVO 0.09 ± 0.32 D(P < 0.0001)。在AL≥28 mm的患者中,57.1%的病例中BU II呈近视趋势,而71.4%的病例中BTAL和EVO呈远视趋势。AL ≥ 28 mm 患者的 MPE 为:BU II -0.16 ± 0.34 D,BTAL 0.18 ± 0.33 D,EVO 0.16 ± 0.32 D(P < 0.0001)。结论:新的EVO和BTAL公式在短眼的准确度高于BU II,而在长眼的准确度上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信