‘The book’s a conversation starter’: a realist exploration of the salutogenic potential of reading for pleasure

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mihirini Sirisena, Monique Lhussier, Eileen Kaner, Angela Wearn, Joanne Gray, Rebecca James, Sam Redgate
{"title":"‘The book’s a conversation starter’: a realist exploration of the salutogenic potential of reading for pleasure","authors":"Mihirini Sirisena, Monique Lhussier, Eileen Kaner, Angela Wearn, Joanne Gray, Rebecca James, Sam Redgate","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2023-012880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading for Wellbeing (RfW) is a pilot initiative, aimed at improving mental health and well-being through supporting access and increasing opportunities to read for pleasure. RfW was implemented across six North-East local authorities in England and employed Community Reading Workers to support access to books and reading for targeted populations. The current study used realist methodology to understand context, potential mechanisms of action, acceptability and reported outcomes. Data generation and analysis were conducted iteratively, using focus groups, interviews and observations. The analysis of the collated data highlighted that a positive attitude towards reading and a desire for social connections were significant motivators for engagement with RfW. This paper postulates eight programme theories relating to that context, which describe key mechanisms within RfW linked to engagement with reading, well-being, connections and practice. The paper concludes that previous notions of positivity associated with reading for pleasure enable participants to experience RfW as a positive social encounter. This positive social encounter enhances participants’ multiple resistance resources such as increased sense of self-efficacy and connectedness that could impact on their sense of well-being. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading for Wellbeing (RfW) is a pilot initiative, aimed at improving mental health and well-being through supporting access and increasing opportunities to read for pleasure. RfW was implemented across six North-East local authorities in England and employed Community Reading Workers to support access to books and reading for targeted populations. The current study used realist methodology to understand context, potential mechanisms of action, acceptability and reported outcomes. Data generation and analysis were conducted iteratively, using focus groups, interviews and observations. The analysis of the collated data highlighted that a positive attitude towards reading and a desire for social connections were significant motivators for engagement with RfW. This paper postulates eight programme theories relating to that context, which describe key mechanisms within RfW linked to engagement with reading, well-being, connections and practice. The paper concludes that previous notions of positivity associated with reading for pleasure enable participants to experience RfW as a positive social encounter. This positive social encounter enhances participants’ multiple resistance resources such as increased sense of self-efficacy and connectedness that could impact on their sense of well-being. No data are available.
书是谈话的开端":对快乐阅读的致敬潜力的现实主义探索
为幸福而读书(RfW)是一项试点倡议,旨在通过支持人们获取和增加快乐阅读的机会来改善心理健康和幸福感。RfW 在英格兰东北部的六个地方政府实施,雇用社区阅读工作者为目标人群提供书籍和阅读支持。本研究采用现实主义方法来了解背景、潜在的作用机制、可接受性和报告结果。通过焦点小组、访谈和观察,反复进行数据生成和分析。对整理数据的分析强调,对阅读的积极态度和对社会联系的渴望是参与 "阅读与收获 "计划的重要动机。本文提出了与这一背景相关的八项计划理论,描述了参与阅读、幸福、联系和实践与 RfW 相关的关键机制。本文的结论是,以往与悦读相关的积极概念使参与者能够将 "无障碍阅读 "体验为一种积极的社会交往。这种积极的社会交往增强了参与者的多种抵抗资源,如自我效能感和联系感的增强,这可能会对他们的幸福感产生影响。暂无数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信