{"title":"Application of Deep Learning for Factor Timing in Asset Management","authors":"Prabhu Prasad Panda, Maysam Khodayari Gharanchaei, Xilin Chen, Haoshu Lyu","doi":"arxiv-2404.18017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the performance of regression models (OLS linear\nregression, Ridge regression, Random Forest, and Fully-connected Neural\nNetwork) on the prediction of CMA (Conservative Minus Aggressive) factor\npremium and the performance of factor timing investment with them.\nOut-of-sample R-squared shows that more flexible models have better performance\nin explaining the variance in factor premium of the unseen period, and the back\ntesting affirms that the factor timing based on more flexible models tends to\nover perform the ones with linear models. However, for flexible models like\nneural networks, the optimal weights based on their prediction tend to be\nunstable, which can lead to high transaction costs and market impacts. We\nverify that tilting down the rebalance frequency according to the historical\noptimal rebalancing scheme can help reduce the transaction costs.","PeriodicalId":501045,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.18017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper examines the performance of regression models (OLS linear
regression, Ridge regression, Random Forest, and Fully-connected Neural
Network) on the prediction of CMA (Conservative Minus Aggressive) factor
premium and the performance of factor timing investment with them.
Out-of-sample R-squared shows that more flexible models have better performance
in explaining the variance in factor premium of the unseen period, and the back
testing affirms that the factor timing based on more flexible models tends to
over perform the ones with linear models. However, for flexible models like
neural networks, the optimal weights based on their prediction tend to be
unstable, which can lead to high transaction costs and market impacts. We
verify that tilting down the rebalance frequency according to the historical
optimal rebalancing scheme can help reduce the transaction costs.
本文研究了回归模型(OLS 线性回归、岭回归、随机森林和全连接神经网络)在预测 CMA(保守减进取)因子溢价上的表现,以及利用这些模型进行因子择时投资的表现。样本外 R 平方表明,更灵活的模型在解释未见时期的因子溢价方差上有更好的表现,回溯测试证实,基于更灵活模型的因子择时往往优于线性模型。然而,对于像神经网络这样的灵活模型,基于其预测的最优权重往往不稳定,这会导致高交易成本和市场影响。我们认为,根据历史最优再平衡方案降低再平衡频率有助于降低交易成本。