The burden of skull base chordomas: insights from a meta-analysis of observational studies

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Giorgio Fiore, Edoardo Porto, Giulio A. Bertani, Hani J. Marcus, Andrea Saladino, Gustavo Pradilla, Francesco DiMeco, Marco Locatelli
{"title":"The burden of skull base chordomas: insights from a meta-analysis of observational studies","authors":"Giorgio Fiore, Edoardo Porto, Giulio A. Bertani, Hani J. Marcus, Andrea Saladino, Gustavo Pradilla, Francesco DiMeco, Marco Locatelli","doi":"10.3171/2024.3.focus23922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\n<p>The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative synthesis of the survival outcomes for patients with skull base chordomas, focusing on the role of 1) the extent of resection (gross-total [GTR] vs non-GTR), 2) the type of surgery (primary vs revision), 3) tumor histology, and 4) the different use of adjuvant therapies (proton beam radiotherapy [PBRT], photon radiotherapy [RT], or none).</p>METHODS\n<p>A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies describing adult and pediatric patient cohorts harboring skull base chordomas were included. The primary outcome measures were represented by the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The main intervention effects were represented by the extent of resection (GTR vs non-GTR), type of surgical excision (primary vs revision surgeries), tumor histology, and the different use of adjuvant therapies (PBRT, RT, or none). The pooled estimates were calculated using random forest models. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case series.</p>RESULTS\n<p>Six hundred forty-four studies were identified through a database and register search. After study selection, 51 studies and 3871 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year OS rate was 73%, which increased to 84% among patients undergoing GTR. The overall 5-year PFS rate was 52%, increasing to 74% for patients receiving GTR. The 5-year OS and PFS rates for patients undergoing PBRT were 86% and 71%, compared with 71% and 54% for patients receiving RT, and 55% and 25% when no adjuvant treatments were used. Patients undergoing their first surgery had 2.13-fold greater chances of being disease-free and 1.4-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years follow-up compared with patients who received a revision surgery. Patients harboring chondroid chordomas had 1.13- and 1.9-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years compared with patients with conventional and de-differentiated chordomas, respectively. The overall risk of bias was low in the included studies.</p>CONCLUSIONS\n<p>The results of this comprehensive meta-analysis highlight the tremendous impact of GTR and adjuvant PBRT on improving OS and PFS of patients harboring skull base chordomas, with better survival rates demonstrated for patients with chondroid tumors. Even in experienced hands, the rate of surgical morbidity remains high. Proper management in high-volume centers is mandatory to reach the expected resection goal at the first surgical attempt and to reduce surgical morbidity. The introduction of the endoscopic endonasal approach was related to improved surgical and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.3.focus23922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative synthesis of the survival outcomes for patients with skull base chordomas, focusing on the role of 1) the extent of resection (gross-total [GTR] vs non-GTR), 2) the type of surgery (primary vs revision), 3) tumor histology, and 4) the different use of adjuvant therapies (proton beam radiotherapy [PBRT], photon radiotherapy [RT], or none).

METHODS

A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies describing adult and pediatric patient cohorts harboring skull base chordomas were included. The primary outcome measures were represented by the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The main intervention effects were represented by the extent of resection (GTR vs non-GTR), type of surgical excision (primary vs revision surgeries), tumor histology, and the different use of adjuvant therapies (PBRT, RT, or none). The pooled estimates were calculated using random forest models. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case series.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-four studies were identified through a database and register search. After study selection, 51 studies and 3871 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year OS rate was 73%, which increased to 84% among patients undergoing GTR. The overall 5-year PFS rate was 52%, increasing to 74% for patients receiving GTR. The 5-year OS and PFS rates for patients undergoing PBRT were 86% and 71%, compared with 71% and 54% for patients receiving RT, and 55% and 25% when no adjuvant treatments were used. Patients undergoing their first surgery had 2.13-fold greater chances of being disease-free and 1.4-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years follow-up compared with patients who received a revision surgery. Patients harboring chondroid chordomas had 1.13- and 1.9-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years compared with patients with conventional and de-differentiated chordomas, respectively. The overall risk of bias was low in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this comprehensive meta-analysis highlight the tremendous impact of GTR and adjuvant PBRT on improving OS and PFS of patients harboring skull base chordomas, with better survival rates demonstrated for patients with chondroid tumors. Even in experienced hands, the rate of surgical morbidity remains high. Proper management in high-volume centers is mandatory to reach the expected resection goal at the first surgical attempt and to reduce surgical morbidity. The introduction of the endoscopic endonasal approach was related to improved surgical and functional outcomes.

颅底脊索瘤的负担:观察性研究荟萃分析的启示
目的本研究旨在对颅底脊索瘤患者的生存结果进行定量综述,重点关注以下因素的作用:1)切除范围(全切除 [GTR] 与非全切除 [GTR]);2)手术类型(原发性与翻修性);3)肿瘤组织学;4)辅助疗法的不同使用(质子束放疗 [PBRT]、光子放疗 [RT] 或不使用)。方法按照 2020 年 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。研究纳入了描述颅底脊索瘤成人和儿童患者队列的观察性研究。主要结局指标以 5 年总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)表示。主要干预效应由切除范围(GTR 与非 GTR)、手术切除类型(初次手术与翻修手术)、肿瘤组织学以及辅助疗法的不同使用(PBRT、RT 或无)来表示。使用随机森林模型计算了汇总的估计值。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的病例系列检查表对偏倚风险进行了评估。经过研究筛选,51项研究和3871名患者被纳入荟萃分析。总体5年OS率为73%,在接受GTR治疗的患者中,OS率增至84%。总体5年PFS率为52%,接受GTR治疗的患者PFS率增至74%。接受PBRT治疗的患者的5年OS率和PFS率分别为86%和71%,而接受RT治疗的患者的5年OS率和PFS率分别为71%和54%,未接受辅助治疗的患者的5年OS率和PFS率分别为55%和25%。与接受复查手术的患者相比,接受首次手术的患者在随访5年后无病生存的几率要高出2.13倍,生存几率要高出1.4倍。与传统脊索瘤和去分化脊索瘤患者相比,患有软骨性脊索瘤的患者5年后存活的几率分别高出1.13倍和1.9倍。结论这项综合荟萃分析的结果凸显了GTR和辅助PBRT对改善颅底脊索瘤患者OS和PFS的巨大影响,软骨肿瘤患者的生存率更高。即使是经验丰富的医生,手术发病率仍然很高。要想在首次手术中达到预期的切除目标,并降低手术发病率,就必须在手术量大的中心进行适当的管理。内窥镜鼻内入路的引入改善了手术和功能效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信