Weight management using meal replacements and cardiometabolic risk reduction in individuals with pre-diabetes and features of metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1111/obr.13751
Jarvis C. Noronha, Stephanie K. Nishi, Tauseef A. Khan, Sonia Blanco Mejia, Cyril W. C. Kendall, Hana Kahleová, Dario Rahelić, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Lawrence A. Leiter, Michael E. J. Lean, John L. Sievenpiper
{"title":"Weight management using meal replacements and cardiometabolic risk reduction in individuals with pre-diabetes and features of metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Jarvis C. Noronha,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Nishi,&nbsp;Tauseef A. Khan,&nbsp;Sonia Blanco Mejia,&nbsp;Cyril W. C. Kendall,&nbsp;Hana Kahleová,&nbsp;Dario Rahelić,&nbsp;Jordi Salas-Salvadó,&nbsp;Lawrence A. Leiter,&nbsp;Michael E. J. Lean,&nbsp;John L. Sievenpiper","doi":"10.1111/obr.13751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This review synthesized the evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of meal replacements (MRs) as part of a weight loss intervention with conventional food-based weight loss diets on cardiometabolic risk in individuals with pre-diabetes and features of metabolic syndrome. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched through January 16, 2024. Data were pooled using the generic inverse variance method and expressed as mean difference [95% confidence intervals]. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Ten trials (<i>n</i> = 1254) met the eligibility criteria. MRs led to greater reductions in body weight (−1.38 kg [−1.81, −0.95]), body mass index (BMI, −0.56 kg/m<sup>2</sup> [−0.78, −0.34]), waist circumference (−1.17 cm [−1.93, −0.41]), HbA<sub>1c</sub> (−0.11% [−0.22, 0.00]), LDL-c (−0.18 mmol/L [−0.28, −0.08]), non-HDL-c (−0.17 mmol/L [−0.33, −0.01]), and systolic blood pressure (−2.22 mmHg [−4.20, −0.23]). The overall certainty of the evidence was low to moderate owing to imprecision and/or inconsistency. The available evidence suggests that incorporating MRs into a weight loss intervention leads to small important reductions in body weight, BMI, LDL-c, non-HDL-c, and systolic blood pressure, and trivial reductions in waist circumference and HbA<sub>1c</sub>, beyond that seen with conventional food-based weight loss diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obr.13751","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review synthesized the evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of meal replacements (MRs) as part of a weight loss intervention with conventional food-based weight loss diets on cardiometabolic risk in individuals with pre-diabetes and features of metabolic syndrome. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched through January 16, 2024. Data were pooled using the generic inverse variance method and expressed as mean difference [95% confidence intervals]. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Ten trials (n = 1254) met the eligibility criteria. MRs led to greater reductions in body weight (−1.38 kg [−1.81, −0.95]), body mass index (BMI, −0.56 kg/m2 [−0.78, −0.34]), waist circumference (−1.17 cm [−1.93, −0.41]), HbA1c (−0.11% [−0.22, 0.00]), LDL-c (−0.18 mmol/L [−0.28, −0.08]), non-HDL-c (−0.17 mmol/L [−0.33, −0.01]), and systolic blood pressure (−2.22 mmHg [−4.20, −0.23]). The overall certainty of the evidence was low to moderate owing to imprecision and/or inconsistency. The available evidence suggests that incorporating MRs into a weight loss intervention leads to small important reductions in body weight, BMI, LDL-c, non-HDL-c, and systolic blood pressure, and trivial reductions in waist circumference and HbA1c, beyond that seen with conventional food-based weight loss diets.

Abstract Image

使用代餐食品控制体重和降低糖尿病前期及代谢综合征患者的心脏代谢风险:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
摘要本综述综合了随机对照试验的证据,这些试验比较了作为减肥干预措施一部分的代餐(MR)与传统的基于食物的减肥饮食对糖尿病前期和代谢综合征患者的心脏代谢风险的影响。对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 的检索截止到 2024 年 1 月 16 日。采用通用逆方差法对数据进行汇总,并以平均差[95%置信区间]表示。采用 GRADE 对证据的整体确定性进行评估。十项试验(n = 1254)符合资格标准。MRs 可使体重 (-1.38 kg [-1.81, -0.95])、体重指数 (BMI, -0.56 kg/m2 [-0.78, -0.34])、腰围 (-1.17cm[-1.93, -0.41])、HbA1(-0.56 kg/m2 [-0.78, -0.34])、血糖 (HbA1) 降低更多。41])、HbA1c(-0.11% [-0.22, 0.00])、LDL-c(-0.18 mmol/L [-0.28, -0.08])、非 HDL-c(-0.17 mmol/L [-0.33, -0.01])和收缩压(-2.22 mmHg [-4.20, -0.23])。由于不精确和/或不一致,证据的总体确定性为中低。现有证据表明,在减肥干预中加入 MRs 可使体重、体重指数(BMI)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(Non-HDL-c)和收缩压略有显著降低,而腰围和 HbA1c 的降低幅度则微不足道,超过了传统的食物减肥饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信