From not knowing to doing: An interprofessional approach to clinician training in use of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) as a recovery-oriented outcome measure in a rural mental health service

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kate Furlanetto, Rajlaxmi Khopade, Vivek Phutane, Ravi Bhat, Paul Stolee
{"title":"From not knowing to doing: An interprofessional approach to clinician training in use of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) as a recovery-oriented outcome measure in a rural mental health service","authors":"Kate Furlanetto,&nbsp;Rajlaxmi Khopade,&nbsp;Vivek Phutane,&nbsp;Ravi Bhat,&nbsp;Paul Stolee","doi":"10.1111/inm.13340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Outcome measurement and feedback are key to quality improvement in healthcare. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is a tool that could be used to measure outcomes of mental health services delivering recovery-oriented care. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tailored, interprofessional, multilevel and adaptable GAS training on clinician views, learning, competence, performance and confidence in the use of GAS. Thematic analysis of eight clinician participant views was done using the method proposed by Braun and Clarke (Thematic analysis: a practical guide to understanding and doing, 2022). Four main themes were generated: clinicians found that this type of training is useful, GAS influenced the way they thought about their roles in goal setting and recovery-oriented care and COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Furthermore, clinicians' skills to set scalable GAS goals with consumers and clinician confidence in using GAS improved. The results of this study show a positive impact of tailored, interprofessional, multilevel and adaptable training supporting development of clinician skills in the GAS process. The training design had a favourable effect on clinician views, learning, competence, performance and confidence of GAS as a recovery-oriented outcome measure. The approach to GAS training and use of GAS as a recovery-oriented outcome measure should be considered in response to mental health service reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"33 5","pages":"1471-1481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outcome measurement and feedback are key to quality improvement in healthcare. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is a tool that could be used to measure outcomes of mental health services delivering recovery-oriented care. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tailored, interprofessional, multilevel and adaptable GAS training on clinician views, learning, competence, performance and confidence in the use of GAS. Thematic analysis of eight clinician participant views was done using the method proposed by Braun and Clarke (Thematic analysis: a practical guide to understanding and doing, 2022). Four main themes were generated: clinicians found that this type of training is useful, GAS influenced the way they thought about their roles in goal setting and recovery-oriented care and COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Furthermore, clinicians' skills to set scalable GAS goals with consumers and clinician confidence in using GAS improved. The results of this study show a positive impact of tailored, interprofessional, multilevel and adaptable training supporting development of clinician skills in the GAS process. The training design had a favourable effect on clinician views, learning, competence, performance and confidence of GAS as a recovery-oriented outcome measure. The approach to GAS training and use of GAS as a recovery-oriented outcome measure should be considered in response to mental health service reform.

从 "不知道 "到 "做":在农村心理健康服务中,采用跨专业方法培训临床医生使用目标达成量表(GAS)作为以康复为导向的结果测量方法
成果衡量和反馈是提高医疗质量的关键。目标达成量表(GAS)是一种可用于衡量以康复为导向的心理健康服务成果的工具。这项前瞻性研究旨在评估量身定制、跨专业、多层次和可调整的 GAS 培训对临床医生使用 GAS 的观点、学习、能力、表现和信心的影响。采用 Braun 和 Clarke(《专题分析:理解与实践的实用指南》,2022 年)提出的方法,对八名临床医师的观点进行了专题分析。分析得出了四大主题:临床医生认为此类培训非常有用;GAS 影响了他们对自己在目标设定和以康复为导向的护理中的角色的思考方式;以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响。此外,临床医生与患者一起制定可扩展的 GAS 目标的技能以及临床医生使用 GAS 的信心也得到了提高。这项研究的结果表明,量身定制、跨专业、多层次和适应性强的培训对临床医生在 GAS 过程中的技能发展具有积极影响。培训设计对临床医生的观点、学习、能力、表现以及对 GAS 作为以康复为导向的结果测量的信心都产生了有利影响。在心理健康服务改革的背景下,应该考虑采用何种方法来开展心理咨询服务培训,以及如何将心理咨询服务作为一种以康复为导向的结果测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信