Interpersonal sensitivity predicts slower change and less change in anxiety symptoms in cognitive behavioural therapy

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jiyoung Song, Genevieve Freedman, Letian Li, Jacqueline B. Persons
{"title":"Interpersonal sensitivity predicts slower change and less change in anxiety symptoms in cognitive behavioural therapy","authors":"Jiyoung Song,&nbsp;Genevieve Freedman,&nbsp;Letian Li,&nbsp;Jacqueline B. Persons","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Patients in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) who are high in interpersonal sensitivity may have difficulty fully engaging in treatment because therapy sessions require intimate interpersonal interactions that are especially uncomfortable for these individuals. The current study tests the hypotheses that patients who are high in interpersonal sensitivity benefit less from CBT for symptoms of depression and anxiety, show a slower rate of change in those symptoms, and are more likely to drop out of treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 832 outpatients who received naturalistic CBT. We assessed interpersonal sensitivity before treatment began and depression and anxiety symptoms at every therapy session. We assessed early, premature, and uncollaborative termination after treatment ended. We constructed multilevel linear regression models and logistic regression models to assess the effects of baseline interpersonal sensitivity on the treatment outcome, the slope of change in depression and anxiety symptoms, and each type of dropout.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Higher baseline interpersonal sensitivity was associated with a slower rate of change and less overall change in anxiety but not depressive symptoms. Baseline interpersonal sensitivity was not a predictor of dropout.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Interpersonal sensitivity at baseline predicts less change and a slower rate of change in anxiety symptoms. Early detection of elevated interpersonal sensitivity can help therapists take action to address these barriers to successful treatment and help scientists build decision support tools that accurately predict the trajectory of change in anxiety symptoms for these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"63 3","pages":"416-430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjc.12470","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Patients in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) who are high in interpersonal sensitivity may have difficulty fully engaging in treatment because therapy sessions require intimate interpersonal interactions that are especially uncomfortable for these individuals. The current study tests the hypotheses that patients who are high in interpersonal sensitivity benefit less from CBT for symptoms of depression and anxiety, show a slower rate of change in those symptoms, and are more likely to drop out of treatment.

Methods

Participants were 832 outpatients who received naturalistic CBT. We assessed interpersonal sensitivity before treatment began and depression and anxiety symptoms at every therapy session. We assessed early, premature, and uncollaborative termination after treatment ended. We constructed multilevel linear regression models and logistic regression models to assess the effects of baseline interpersonal sensitivity on the treatment outcome, the slope of change in depression and anxiety symptoms, and each type of dropout.

Results

Higher baseline interpersonal sensitivity was associated with a slower rate of change and less overall change in anxiety but not depressive symptoms. Baseline interpersonal sensitivity was not a predictor of dropout.

Conclusions

Interpersonal sensitivity at baseline predicts less change and a slower rate of change in anxiety symptoms. Early detection of elevated interpersonal sensitivity can help therapists take action to address these barriers to successful treatment and help scientists build decision support tools that accurately predict the trajectory of change in anxiety symptoms for these patients.

Abstract Image

人际关系敏感性可预测认知行为疗法中焦虑症状的缓慢变化和较小变化
目的认知行为疗法(CBT)中人际关系敏感度高的患者可能很难完全投入治疗,因为治疗过程需要亲密的人际互动,而这对这些人来说特别不舒服。本研究验证了以下假设:人际关系敏感度高的患者在抑郁和焦虑症状方面从 CBT 治疗中获益较少,这些症状的变化速度较慢,并且更有可能放弃治疗。我们在治疗开始前对人际关系敏感性进行了评估,并在每次治疗过程中对抑郁和焦虑症状进行了评估。在治疗结束后,我们对早期终止、过早终止和不合作终止进行了评估。我们建立了多层次线性回归模型和逻辑回归模型,以评估基线人际关系敏感性对治疗结果、抑郁和焦虑症状变化斜率以及各种辍学类型的影响。结果基线人际关系敏感性越高,焦虑症状的变化速度越慢,总体变化越小,但抑郁症状却没有变化。结论基线人际关系敏感度可预测焦虑症状的较小变化和较慢的变化速度。人际关系敏感性升高的早期检测可以帮助治疗师采取行动解决这些阻碍成功治疗的问题,并帮助科学家建立决策支持工具,准确预测这些患者焦虑症状的变化轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信