Enviro-economic and feasibility analysis of industrial hemp value chain: A systematic literature review

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Rajan Budhathoki, Tek Maraseni, Armando Apan
{"title":"Enviro-economic and feasibility analysis of industrial hemp value chain: A systematic literature review","authors":"Rajan Budhathoki,&nbsp;Tek Maraseni,&nbsp;Armando Apan","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A recent renaissance of industrial hemp has been driven by a plethora of ecologically amicable products and their profitability. To identify its environment and economic fate across the value chain (VC), this study conducts a systematic review of 98 studies published in ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus-indexed journals. The thematic content of the articles is categorized using three deductively derived classification categories: lifecycle analysis (<i>n</i> = 40), VC analysis (<i>n</i> = 30), and feasibility analysis (<i>n</i> = 28). Bibliometric analysis indicates that the majority (&gt;90%) of the studies were conducted in selected regions of Europe or North America, with further findings around regionally prioritized industrial hemp products, such as hempcrete in Southwest Europe, solid biofuel in North European states, and textile fiber and bio-composites in East Europe and North America. Lifecycle analysis studies highlight nitrogenous fertilizer use during industrial hemp cultivation as a major ecological hotspot, which is taking a toll on the climate change index. However, hemp-based products are generally climate-friendly solutions when contrasted against their fossil fuel counterparts, with hempcrete in particular a highly touted carbon-negative (−4.28 to −36.08 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>2</sup>) product. The review also identifies key issues within the hemp VC and presents innovative solutions alongside the recognition of value-adding opportunities. Furthermore, feasibility analysis indicates unprofitability in using hemp for bioenergy production and there is a relative cost worthiness of hemp bio-composites and hempcrete at the upstream level. Positive returns are observed under co-production schemes. In contemplating the literature findings, we discussed and identified gap in existing literature for future exploration, including more studies to provide insights from the Global South, and the production of industrial hemp under a biophysically constrained landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent renaissance of industrial hemp has been driven by a plethora of ecologically amicable products and their profitability. To identify its environment and economic fate across the value chain (VC), this study conducts a systematic review of 98 studies published in ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus-indexed journals. The thematic content of the articles is categorized using three deductively derived classification categories: lifecycle analysis (n = 40), VC analysis (n = 30), and feasibility analysis (n = 28). Bibliometric analysis indicates that the majority (>90%) of the studies were conducted in selected regions of Europe or North America, with further findings around regionally prioritized industrial hemp products, such as hempcrete in Southwest Europe, solid biofuel in North European states, and textile fiber and bio-composites in East Europe and North America. Lifecycle analysis studies highlight nitrogenous fertilizer use during industrial hemp cultivation as a major ecological hotspot, which is taking a toll on the climate change index. However, hemp-based products are generally climate-friendly solutions when contrasted against their fossil fuel counterparts, with hempcrete in particular a highly touted carbon-negative (−4.28 to −36.08 kg CO2 eq/m2) product. The review also identifies key issues within the hemp VC and presents innovative solutions alongside the recognition of value-adding opportunities. Furthermore, feasibility analysis indicates unprofitability in using hemp for bioenergy production and there is a relative cost worthiness of hemp bio-composites and hempcrete at the upstream level. Positive returns are observed under co-production schemes. In contemplating the literature findings, we discussed and identified gap in existing literature for future exploration, including more studies to provide insights from the Global South, and the production of industrial hemp under a biophysically constrained landscape.

Abstract Image

工业大麻价值链的环境经济和可行性分析:系统文献综述
近来,大量生态友好型产品及其盈利能力推动了工业大麻的复兴。为了确定工业大麻在整个价值链(VC)中的环境和经济命运,本研究对发表在 ScienceDirect、Web of Science 和 Scopus 索引期刊上的 98 篇研究进行了系统综述。文章的主题内容采用三种演绎法进行分类:生命周期分析(40 篇)、VC 分析(30 篇)和可行性分析(28 篇)。文献计量分析表明,大多数(90%)研究都是在欧洲或北美的选定地区进行的,并围绕地区优先考虑的工业大麻产品有进一步的发现,例如西南欧的大麻混凝土、北欧各州的固体生物燃料以及东欧和北美的纺织纤维和生物复合材料。生命周期分析研究强调,工业大麻种植过程中的氮肥使用是一个主要的生态热点,正在对气候变化指数造成影响。然而,与化石燃料同类产品相比,大麻产品通常是气候友好型解决方案,特别是大麻混凝土是一种备受推崇的负碳(-4.28 至 -36.08 千克二氧化碳当量/平方米)产品。审查还确定了大麻风险投资中的关键问题,并在确认增值机会的同时提出了创新解决方案。此外,可行性分析表明,将大麻用于生物能源生产无利可图,而大麻生物复合材料和大麻混凝土在上游层面具有相对的成本价值。在共同生产计划中,可以观察到正收益。在思考文献研究结果的过程中,我们讨论并确定了现有文献中有待未来探索的空白,包括更多的研究,以提供来自全球南部的见解,以及在生物物理限制条件下的工业大麻生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信