Drawing the Boundaries Between Blockchain and Blockchain-Like Systems: A Comprehensive Survey on Distributed Ledger Technologies

IF 23.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Badr Bellaj;Aafaf Ouaddah;Emmanuel Bertin;Noel Crespi;Abdellatif Mezrioui
{"title":"Drawing the Boundaries Between Blockchain and Blockchain-Like Systems: A Comprehensive Survey on Distributed Ledger Technologies","authors":"Badr Bellaj;Aafaf Ouaddah;Emmanuel Bertin;Noel Crespi;Abdellatif Mezrioui","doi":"10.1109/JPROC.2024.3386257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bitcoin’s success as a global cryptocurrency has paved the way for the emergence of blockchain, a revolutionary category of distributed systems. However, the growing popularity of blockchain has led to a significant divergence from its core principles in many systems labeled as “blockchain.” This divergence has introduced complexity into the blockchain ecosystem, exacerbated by a lack of comprehensive reviews on blockchain and its variants. Consequently, gaining a clear and updated understanding of the diverse spectrum of current blockchain and blockchain-like systems has become challenging. This situation underscores the necessity for an extensive literature review and the development of thematic taxonomies. This survey seeks to offer a comprehensive and current assessment of existing blockchains and their variations while delineating the boundaries between blockchain and blockchain-like systems. To achieve this objective, we propose a holistic reference model for conceptualizing and analyzing these systems. Our layer-wise framework envisions all distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) as composed of four principal layers: data, consensus, execution, and application (DCEA). In addition, we introduce a new taxonomy that enhances the classification of blockchain and blockchain-like systems, offering a more useful perspective than existing works. Furthermore, we conduct a state-of-the-art review from a layered perspective, employing 23 evaluative criteria predefined by our framework. We perform a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis of 44 DLT solutions and 26 consensus mechanisms while discussing differences and boundaries between blockchain and blockchain-like systems. We emphasize the significant challenges and tradeoffs encountered by distributed ledger designers, decision-makers, and project managers during the design or adoption of a DLT solution. Finally, we outline crucial research challenges and directions in the field of DLTs.","PeriodicalId":20556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE","volume":"112 3","pages":"247-299"},"PeriodicalIF":23.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10517413/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bitcoin’s success as a global cryptocurrency has paved the way for the emergence of blockchain, a revolutionary category of distributed systems. However, the growing popularity of blockchain has led to a significant divergence from its core principles in many systems labeled as “blockchain.” This divergence has introduced complexity into the blockchain ecosystem, exacerbated by a lack of comprehensive reviews on blockchain and its variants. Consequently, gaining a clear and updated understanding of the diverse spectrum of current blockchain and blockchain-like systems has become challenging. This situation underscores the necessity for an extensive literature review and the development of thematic taxonomies. This survey seeks to offer a comprehensive and current assessment of existing blockchains and their variations while delineating the boundaries between blockchain and blockchain-like systems. To achieve this objective, we propose a holistic reference model for conceptualizing and analyzing these systems. Our layer-wise framework envisions all distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) as composed of four principal layers: data, consensus, execution, and application (DCEA). In addition, we introduce a new taxonomy that enhances the classification of blockchain and blockchain-like systems, offering a more useful perspective than existing works. Furthermore, we conduct a state-of-the-art review from a layered perspective, employing 23 evaluative criteria predefined by our framework. We perform a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis of 44 DLT solutions and 26 consensus mechanisms while discussing differences and boundaries between blockchain and blockchain-like systems. We emphasize the significant challenges and tradeoffs encountered by distributed ledger designers, decision-makers, and project managers during the design or adoption of a DLT solution. Finally, we outline crucial research challenges and directions in the field of DLTs.
划清区块链和类似区块链系统的界限:分布式账本技术综合调查
比特币作为全球加密货币的成功,为区块链这一革命性的分布式系统的出现铺平了道路。然而,随着区块链的日益普及,许多标榜为 "区块链 "的系统却与区块链的核心原则大相径庭。这种分歧给区块链生态系统带来了复杂性,而缺乏对区块链及其变体的全面审查又加剧了这种复杂性。因此,对当前区块链和类区块链系统的各种不同情况有一个清晰和最新的了解已变得具有挑战性。这种情况凸显了进行广泛文献综述和制定专题分类法的必要性。本调查旨在对现有区块链及其变体进行全面的最新评估,同时划定区块链和类区块链系统之间的界限。为实现这一目标,我们提出了一个概念化和分析这些系统的整体参考模型。我们的分层框架将所有分布式账本技术(DLT)设想为由四个主要层组成:数据层、共识层、执行层和应用层(DCEA)。此外,我们还引入了一种新的分类法,加强了区块链和类区块链系统的分类,提供了比现有著作更有用的视角。此外,我们从分层的角度对最新技术进行了回顾,采用了我们的框架预先确定的 23 项评估标准。我们对 44 种 DLT 解决方案和 26 种共识机制进行了定性和定量比较分析,同时讨论了区块链和类区块链系统之间的差异和界限。我们强调了分布式账本设计者、决策者和项目经理在设计或采用 DLT 解决方案时遇到的重大挑战和权衡。最后,我们概述了 DLT 领域的重要研究挑战和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the IEEE
Proceedings of the IEEE 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
46.40
自引率
1.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the IEEE is the leading journal to provide in-depth review, survey, and tutorial coverage of the technical developments in electronics, electrical and computer engineering, and computer science. Consistently ranked as one of the top journals by Impact Factor, Article Influence Score and more, the journal serves as a trusted resource for engineers around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信