Carolina L. Paiva, Christy A. Hipsley, Johannes Müller, Hussam Zaher, Henrique C. Costa
{"title":"Comparative skull osteology of Amphisbaena arda and Amphisbaena vermicularis (Squamata: Amphisbaenidae)","authors":"Carolina L. Paiva, Christy A. Hipsley, Johannes Müller, Hussam Zaher, Henrique C. Costa","doi":"10.1002/jmor.21702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The skull anatomy of amphisbaenians directly influences their capacity to burrow and is crucial for the study of their systematics, which ultimately contributes to our comprehension of their evolution and ecology. In this study, we employed three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography to provide a detailed description and comprehensive comparison of the skull anatomy of two amphisbaenian species with similar external morphology, <i>Amphisbaena arda</i> and <i>Amphisbaena vermicularis</i>. Our findings revealed some differences between the species, especially in the sagittal crest of the parietal bone, the ascendant process, and the transverse occipital crest of the occipital complex. We also found intraspecific variation within <i>A. vermicularis</i>, with some specimens displaying morphology that differed from their conspecifics but not from <i>A. arda</i>. The observed intraspecific variation within <i>A. vermicularis</i> cannot be attributed to soil features because all specimens came from the same locality. Specimen size and soil type may play a role in the observed differences between <i>A. arda</i> and <i>A. vermicularis</i>, as the single <i>A. arda</i> specimen is the largest of our sample and soil type and texture differ between the collection sites of the two species.</p>","PeriodicalId":16528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Morphology","volume":"285 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.21702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The skull anatomy of amphisbaenians directly influences their capacity to burrow and is crucial for the study of their systematics, which ultimately contributes to our comprehension of their evolution and ecology. In this study, we employed three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography to provide a detailed description and comprehensive comparison of the skull anatomy of two amphisbaenian species with similar external morphology, Amphisbaena arda and Amphisbaena vermicularis. Our findings revealed some differences between the species, especially in the sagittal crest of the parietal bone, the ascendant process, and the transverse occipital crest of the occipital complex. We also found intraspecific variation within A. vermicularis, with some specimens displaying morphology that differed from their conspecifics but not from A. arda. The observed intraspecific variation within A. vermicularis cannot be attributed to soil features because all specimens came from the same locality. Specimen size and soil type may play a role in the observed differences between A. arda and A. vermicularis, as the single A. arda specimen is the largest of our sample and soil type and texture differ between the collection sites of the two species.
两栖类的头骨解剖结构直接影响它们的穴居能力,对研究它们的系统学至关重要,最终有助于我们理解它们的进化和生态学。在这项研究中,我们采用三维 X 射线计算机断层扫描技术,对两种外部形态相似的两栖类动物(Amphisbaena arda 和 Amphisbaena vermicularis)的头骨解剖进行了详细描述和全面比较。我们的发现揭示了这两个物种之间的一些差异,尤其是顶骨的矢状嵴、上升突和枕骨复合体的枕横嵴。我们还发现蚯蚓的种内变异,一些标本的形态与同种不同,但与阿尔达蚯蚓没有差异。由于所有标本都来自同一地点,因此在 A. vermicularis 中观察到的种内差异不能归因于土壤特性。标本的大小和土壤类型可能是造成 A. arda 和 A. vermicularis 之间差异的原因之一,因为单个 A. arda 标本是我们样本中最大的,而且这两个物种的采集地点的土壤类型和质地也不相同。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Morphology welcomes articles of original research in cytology, protozoology, embryology, and general morphology. Articles generally should not exceed 35 printed pages. Preliminary notices or articles of a purely descriptive morphological or taxonomic nature are not included. No paper which has already been published will be accepted, nor will simultaneous publications elsewhere be allowed.
The Journal of Morphology publishes research in functional, comparative, evolutionary and developmental morphology from vertebrates and invertebrates. Human and veterinary anatomy or paleontology are considered when an explicit connection to neontological animal morphology is presented, and the paper contains relevant information for the community of animal morphologists. Based on our long tradition, we continue to seek publishing the best papers in animal morphology.