Mainstreaming biodiversity targets into sectoral policies and plans: A review from a Biodiversity Policy Integration perspective

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Hens Runhaar , Fabian Pröbstl , Felician Heim , Elsa Cardona Santos , Joachim Claudet , Lyda Dik , Guilherme de Queiroz-Stein , Agnes Zolyomi , Yves Zinngrebe
{"title":"Mainstreaming biodiversity targets into sectoral policies and plans: A review from a Biodiversity Policy Integration perspective","authors":"Hens Runhaar ,&nbsp;Fabian Pröbstl ,&nbsp;Felician Heim ,&nbsp;Elsa Cardona Santos ,&nbsp;Joachim Claudet ,&nbsp;Lyda Dik ,&nbsp;Guilherme de Queiroz-Stein ,&nbsp;Agnes Zolyomi ,&nbsp;Yves Zinngrebe","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2024.100209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The integration or mainstreaming of biodiversity targets in sectoral policies and plans (BPI) is considered necessary for bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Scientific research on the actual performance of BPI is rather recent and fragmented. Based on a coding scheme, we systematically analyse international empirical BPI studies published in 43 international peer-reviewed journal papers. We show that, so far, overall levels of BPI are low, reflected in too abstract targets, add-on biodiversity policies not targeting the driving forces of biodiversity loss, and insufficient resources made available to pursue biodiversity recovery. Joint planning processes, the revision of policies for consistent and coherent incentives, and adaptive learning are identified as central factors for improving BPI, but considerable barriers in these areas undermine progress in BPI. A change in institutional settings seems necessary to provide more favourable conditions for BPI, including the assignment of less voluntary responsibilities for biodiversity recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000090/pdfft?md5=d9bf1bf07caf3ca0cf3541057e47a4ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811624000090-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration or mainstreaming of biodiversity targets in sectoral policies and plans (BPI) is considered necessary for bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Scientific research on the actual performance of BPI is rather recent and fragmented. Based on a coding scheme, we systematically analyse international empirical BPI studies published in 43 international peer-reviewed journal papers. We show that, so far, overall levels of BPI are low, reflected in too abstract targets, add-on biodiversity policies not targeting the driving forces of biodiversity loss, and insufficient resources made available to pursue biodiversity recovery. Joint planning processes, the revision of policies for consistent and coherent incentives, and adaptive learning are identified as central factors for improving BPI, but considerable barriers in these areas undermine progress in BPI. A change in institutional settings seems necessary to provide more favourable conditions for BPI, including the assignment of less voluntary responsibilities for biodiversity recovery.

将生物多样性目标纳入部门政策和计划的主流:从生物多样性政策整合的角度进行审查
将生物多样性目标纳入部门政策和计划的主流(BPI)被认为是扭转生物多样性丧失曲线的必要条件。有关 BPI 实际绩效的科学研究刚刚起步,而且比较零散。根据编码方案,我们对 43 篇国际同行评审期刊论文中发表的国际经验性 BPI 研究进行了系统分析。我们发现,迄今为止,生物多样性保护的总体水平较低,这反映在目标过于抽象、附加的生物多样性政策没有针对生物多样性丧失的驱动力,以及用于生物多样性恢复的资源不足。联合规划进程、修订政策以采取一致和连贯的激励措施以及适应性学习被认为是改善生物多样性保护的核心因素,但这些领域的巨大障碍阻碍了生物多样性保护的进展。似乎有必要改变机构设置,为生物多样性保护提供更有利的条件,包括为生物多样性恢复分配较少的自愿责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信