Groundwater Institutions in the Face of Global Climate Change

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Jinhua Zhao, Nathan P. Hendricks, Haoyang Li
{"title":"Groundwater Institutions in the Face of Global Climate Change","authors":"Jinhua Zhao, Nathan P. Hendricks, Haoyang Li","doi":"10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-100909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review the literature on the performance of groundwater institutions, including command-and-control (CAC) approaches, market-based institutions (MBIs), and voluntary approaches, and evaluate how they will perform as agriculture adapts to climate change. Both CAC approaches and MBIs lead to uneven distributional impacts on farmers, and voluntary approaches have not been successful in reducing water withdrawal on a large scale. A polycentric approach of regulation plus local management might perform well. Climate change will increase the irrigation demand for groundwater and demand flexible and properly scoped institutions that attend to local conditions.","PeriodicalId":48856,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Resource Economics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-100909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We review the literature on the performance of groundwater institutions, including command-and-control (CAC) approaches, market-based institutions (MBIs), and voluntary approaches, and evaluate how they will perform as agriculture adapts to climate change. Both CAC approaches and MBIs lead to uneven distributional impacts on farmers, and voluntary approaches have not been successful in reducing water withdrawal on a large scale. A polycentric approach of regulation plus local management might perform well. Climate change will increase the irrigation demand for groundwater and demand flexible and properly scoped institutions that attend to local conditions.
面对全球气候变化的地下水机构
我们回顾了有关地下水机构绩效的文献,包括指令与控制(CAC)方法、基于市场的机构(MBIs)和自愿方法,并评估了这些机构在农业适应气候变化过程中的绩效。命令与控制(CAC)方法和基于市场的制度(MBIs)都会导致对农民的分配影响不均,而自愿方法在大规模减少取水量方面并不成功。监管加地方管理的多中心方法可能会取得良好效果。气候变化将增加对地下水的灌溉需求,这就要求建立灵活、范围适当、符合当地条件的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Resource Economics
Annual Review of Resource Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Resource Economics provides authoritative critical reviews evaluating the most significant research developments in resource economics, focusing on agricultural economics, environmental economics, renewable resources, and exhaustible resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信