Daryl R. Chastain, John L. Snider, Bhupinder Singh, Gurpreet Virk
{"title":"Drought response modelling of leaf photosynthetic parameters in two Gossypium species","authors":"Daryl R. Chastain, John L. Snider, Bhupinder Singh, Gurpreet Virk","doi":"10.1111/jac.12709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cotton is well adapted to dry areas, but progressive water deficits can lead to declines in net photosynthesis (A), ultimately reducing yield. However, the exact mechanism responsible for this decline in net photosynthesis (stomatal or non-stomatal) is not fully understood under field conditions, partially due to limitations in the ability to collect critical data. To our knowledge, no other study has compared the drought responses of Pima and upland cotton using both CO<sub>2</sub> response and chlorophyll fluorescence under field conditions. To this end, a field study was conducted to quantify the impact of progressive mild drought, as measured by midday stomatal conductance to water vapour (<i>g</i><sub>s</sub>), on cotton leaf metabolism in Pima and upland cotton. Survey gas exchange and rapid photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> response (RACiR) were conducted during flowering on the same leaf. The study observed decline in A as <i>g</i><sub>s</sub> declined for both species. Correlation analysis indicated typical relationships with A and parameters associated with stomatal limitations such as decreased CO<sub>2</sub> inside the leaf and at the site of carboxylation; however, it was found that while Pima exhibited a strong relationship between maximum electron transport rate (<i>J</i><sub>max</sub>) and electron transport rate (ETR), upland cotton did not. Furthermore, when ETR is broken down into proportions contributing to net photosynthesis and photorespiration (ETR<sub>A</sub>, ETR<sub>P</sub>, respectively), we found that a greater proportion of ETR is being shuttled to the photorespiratory pathway in upland, relative to Pima as <i>g</i><sub>s</sub> decreases. Our results fill critical knowledge gaps that can be useful for modellers and breeders when preparing for future climate change scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"210 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jac.12709","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.12709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cotton is well adapted to dry areas, but progressive water deficits can lead to declines in net photosynthesis (A), ultimately reducing yield. However, the exact mechanism responsible for this decline in net photosynthesis (stomatal or non-stomatal) is not fully understood under field conditions, partially due to limitations in the ability to collect critical data. To our knowledge, no other study has compared the drought responses of Pima and upland cotton using both CO2 response and chlorophyll fluorescence under field conditions. To this end, a field study was conducted to quantify the impact of progressive mild drought, as measured by midday stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs), on cotton leaf metabolism in Pima and upland cotton. Survey gas exchange and rapid photosynthetic CO2 response (RACiR) were conducted during flowering on the same leaf. The study observed decline in A as gs declined for both species. Correlation analysis indicated typical relationships with A and parameters associated with stomatal limitations such as decreased CO2 inside the leaf and at the site of carboxylation; however, it was found that while Pima exhibited a strong relationship between maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) and electron transport rate (ETR), upland cotton did not. Furthermore, when ETR is broken down into proportions contributing to net photosynthesis and photorespiration (ETRA, ETRP, respectively), we found that a greater proportion of ETR is being shuttled to the photorespiratory pathway in upland, relative to Pima as gs decreases. Our results fill critical knowledge gaps that can be useful for modellers and breeders when preparing for future climate change scenarios.
棉花非常适应干旱地区,但逐渐缺水会导致净光合作用(A)下降,最终降低产量。然而,在田间条件下,导致净光合作用(气孔或非气孔)下降的确切机制还不完全清楚,部分原因是收集关键数据的能力有限。据我们所知,还没有其他研究同时使用二氧化碳响应和叶绿素荧光来比较皮马棉和陆地棉在田间条件下的干旱响应。为此,我们进行了一项田间研究,通过中午气孔对水蒸气的传导率(gs)来量化渐进式轻度干旱对皮马棉和陆地棉叶片新陈代谢的影响。在同一叶片开花期间进行了气体交换调查和快速光合 CO2 反应(RACiR)。研究观察到,两种棉花的 A 均随着 gs 的下降而下降。相关性分析表明了 A 与气孔限制相关参数的典型关系,如叶片内部和羧化部位 CO2 的减少;但研究发现,皮马棉的最大电子传输速率(Jmax)与电子传输速率(ETR)之间存在密切关系,而陆地棉则没有。此外,当将电子传输速率分解为有助于净光合作用和光呼吸的比例(分别为 ETRA 和 ETRP)时,我们发现,随着 gs 的降低,高地棉中更多的电子传输速率被转移到了光呼吸途径,而不是皮马棉。我们的研究结果填补了重要的知识空白,有助于建模人员和育种人员为未来的气候变化做准备。
期刊介绍:
The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.