‘Things that shouldn’t be’: a qualitative investigation of violation-related appraisals in individuals with OCD and/or trauma histories

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sandra Krause, Adam S. Radomsky
{"title":"‘Things that shouldn’t be’: a qualitative investigation of violation-related appraisals in individuals with OCD and/or trauma histories","authors":"Sandra Krause, Adam S. Radomsky","doi":"10.1017/s1352465824000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background:</span><p>Cognitive models of mental contamination (i.e. feelings of internal dirtiness without contact with a contaminant) propose that these feelings arise when individuals misappraise a violation. However, an operational definition of ‘violation’ and identification of specific violation misappraisals is limited.</p><span>Aims:</span><p>This study’s aim was to elaborate on cognitive models using qualitative data from those with lived experience to fill these gaps.</p><span>Method:</span><p>Twenty participants with a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder and/or a trauma history took part in a semi-structured interview about violation. Grounded theory was used to analyse interview transcripts.</p><span>Discussion:</span><p>Three categories emerged, each with several themes – <span>qualities of violation</span>, <span>violation-related appraisals</span>, and <span>violation-related behaviours</span>. Different violation-related appraisals were associated with different emotions and urges. Specific self-focused appraisal sub-themes (i.e. <span>permanence of consequences</span>; <span>self-worth</span>; <span>responsibility, self-blame and regret</span>) were most closely related to emotions tied to mental contamination. These findings support and expand upon existing cognitive models of mental contamination, identifying key violation-related appraisals and differentiating between mental contamination-related appraisals and those related to other emotional sequelae. Future quantitative and experimental research can evaluate the potential of these appraisals as intervention targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465824000201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

Cognitive models of mental contamination (i.e. feelings of internal dirtiness without contact with a contaminant) propose that these feelings arise when individuals misappraise a violation. However, an operational definition of ‘violation’ and identification of specific violation misappraisals is limited.

Aims:

This study’s aim was to elaborate on cognitive models using qualitative data from those with lived experience to fill these gaps.

Method:

Twenty participants with a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder and/or a trauma history took part in a semi-structured interview about violation. Grounded theory was used to analyse interview transcripts.

Discussion:

Three categories emerged, each with several themes – qualities of violation, violation-related appraisals, and violation-related behaviours. Different violation-related appraisals were associated with different emotions and urges. Specific self-focused appraisal sub-themes (i.e. permanence of consequences; self-worth; responsibility, self-blame and regret) were most closely related to emotions tied to mental contamination. These findings support and expand upon existing cognitive models of mental contamination, identifying key violation-related appraisals and differentiating between mental contamination-related appraisals and those related to other emotional sequelae. Future quantitative and experimental research can evaluate the potential of these appraisals as intervention targets.

不应该发生的事情":对有强迫症和/或创伤史的人与侵犯有关的评价进行定性调查
背景:精神污染的认知模型(即在未接触污染物的情况下产生的内在污秽感)认为,当个人错误评价违规行为时,就会产生这种感觉。方法:20 名被诊断为强迫症和/或有心理创伤史的参与者参加了关于 "侵犯 "的半结构式访谈。讨论:访谈中出现了三个类别,每个类别都有几个主题--侵犯的特质、与侵犯相关的评价以及与侵犯相关的行为。不同的侵犯相关评价与不同的情绪和冲动相关。以自我为中心的特定评价次主题(即后果的永久性;自我价值;责任、自责和后悔)与精神污染相关情绪的关系最为密切。这些发现支持并扩展了现有的精神污染认知模型,确定了与侵犯有关的关键评价,并区分了与精神污染有关的评价和与其他情绪后遗症有关的评价。未来的定量和实验研究可以评估这些评价作为干预目标的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信