A Qualitative Systematic Review of Trust in Technology

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sebastian Schuetz, Le Kuai, Mary C Lacity, Zach Steelman
{"title":"A Qualitative Systematic Review of Trust in Technology","authors":"Sebastian Schuetz, Le Kuai, Mary C Lacity, Zach Steelman","doi":"10.1177/02683962241254392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many information systems (IS) scholars have researched the antecedents and consequences of trust in technology, the sheer amount of work published, authors’ use of inconsistent construct terms, and variations in conceptualization and measurement make it difficult to compare and aggregate findings across studies. To provide scholars with an overview of the literature, we performed a systematic qualitative review of the IS literature. The goal of our review was to identify the antecedents and consequences of trust in technology that have received frequent empirical support, as well as those for which the evidence is not yet conclusive. To that end, we curated a glossary of unique construct terms and summarized the results of 241 relationships tested in 62 empirical research articles (both quantitative and qualitative) from the AIS “Basket of Eight” journals. From these, we identified 62 unique relationships: 22 are well-supported, six are supported by suggestive evidence, and 34 have received little support. These relationships summarize what is well-known and less well-known within the literature. By taking stock, we prepare a path for future research on the phenomenon of trust in the context of emerging technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence, blockchain). We conclude the paper with opportunities and directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":50178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962241254392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although many information systems (IS) scholars have researched the antecedents and consequences of trust in technology, the sheer amount of work published, authors’ use of inconsistent construct terms, and variations in conceptualization and measurement make it difficult to compare and aggregate findings across studies. To provide scholars with an overview of the literature, we performed a systematic qualitative review of the IS literature. The goal of our review was to identify the antecedents and consequences of trust in technology that have received frequent empirical support, as well as those for which the evidence is not yet conclusive. To that end, we curated a glossary of unique construct terms and summarized the results of 241 relationships tested in 62 empirical research articles (both quantitative and qualitative) from the AIS “Basket of Eight” journals. From these, we identified 62 unique relationships: 22 are well-supported, six are supported by suggestive evidence, and 34 have received little support. These relationships summarize what is well-known and less well-known within the literature. By taking stock, we prepare a path for future research on the phenomenon of trust in the context of emerging technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence, blockchain). We conclude the paper with opportunities and directions for future research.
对技术信任的定性系统回顾
尽管许多信息系统(IS)学者对技术信任的前因后果进行了研究,但由于发表的论文数量庞大、作者使用的结构术语不一致以及概念化和测量方法的差异,很难对不同研究的结果进行比较和汇总。为了向学者们提供文献综述,我们对信息系统文献进行了系统的定性综述。我们回顾的目的是找出技术信任的前因后果,这些前因后果经常得到实证支持,而那些后果的证据尚无定论。为此,我们整理了一个独特的结构术语表,并总结了 AIS "八篮子 "期刊中 62 篇实证研究文章(包括定量和定性研究)中测试的 241 种关系的结果。从中,我们确定了 62 种独特的关系:22 种得到了充分的支持,6 种得到了暗示性证据的支持,34 种几乎没有得到支持。这些关系概括了文献中知名和不太知名的关系。通过总结,我们为未来研究新兴技术(如人工智能、区块链)背景下的信任现象铺平了道路。最后,我们提出了未来研究的机遇和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Technology
Journal of Information Technology 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Information Technology (JIT) is to provide academically robust papers, research, critical reviews and opinions on the organisational, social and management issues associated with significant information-based technologies. It is designed to be read by academics, scholars, advanced students, reflective practitioners, and those seeking an update on current experience and future prospects in relation to contemporary information and communications technology themes. JIT focuses on new research addressing technology and the management of IT, including strategy, change, infrastructure, human resources, sourcing, system development and implementation, communications, technology developments, technology futures, national policies and standards. It also publishes articles that advance our understanding and application of research approaches and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信