Beach day or deadly heatwave? Content analysis of media images from the 2021 Heat Dome in Canada

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Emily J. Tetzlaff, Nicholas Goulet, Nihal Yapici, Melissa Gorman, Gregory R.A. Richardson, Paddy M. Enright, Glen P. Kenny
{"title":"Beach day or deadly heatwave? Content analysis of media images from the 2021 Heat Dome in Canada","authors":"Emily J. Tetzlaff, Nicholas Goulet, Nihal Yapici, Melissa Gorman, Gregory R.A. Richardson, Paddy M. Enright, Glen P. Kenny","doi":"10.1007/s10584-024-03713-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During extreme heat events (EHEs) the public often learns about health protective actions through the media. Visual news coverage can act as a powerful tool to help convey complex health protective actions to the public. Despite the importance of images in helping the public understand the risk, there has been no systematic analysis to assess what images have been used by media outlets in Canada during EHEs. This paper helps to fill that gap by analyzing how the Canadian media visually communicated the risks of extreme heat to the public during the unprecedented 2021 Heat Dome. A review of thousands of online news media articles published about the 2021 Heat Dome in Canada was conducted on five subscription news databases. Overall, 845 images were coded to identify denotative, connotative, and ideological content. Only 16% of these published images implied that heat was dangerous, of which only 40% depicted people, and 46% implied human suffering. Our findings demonstrate that the majority of images used in Canadian news coverage on the 2021 Heat Dome are incompatible with, and frequently contradict, evidence-based heat protective actions. Governments, public health agencies, and other stakeholders engaged in distributing heat preparedness messaging (e.g., journalists) should prioritize improving the images of extreme heat in news coverage to align with evidence-based public health messages. With rising global temperatures due to climate change and the associated increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme heat events, prioritizing these actions is critically important to offset the threat posed to public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":10372,"journal":{"name":"Climatic Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climatic Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03713-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During extreme heat events (EHEs) the public often learns about health protective actions through the media. Visual news coverage can act as a powerful tool to help convey complex health protective actions to the public. Despite the importance of images in helping the public understand the risk, there has been no systematic analysis to assess what images have been used by media outlets in Canada during EHEs. This paper helps to fill that gap by analyzing how the Canadian media visually communicated the risks of extreme heat to the public during the unprecedented 2021 Heat Dome. A review of thousands of online news media articles published about the 2021 Heat Dome in Canada was conducted on five subscription news databases. Overall, 845 images were coded to identify denotative, connotative, and ideological content. Only 16% of these published images implied that heat was dangerous, of which only 40% depicted people, and 46% implied human suffering. Our findings demonstrate that the majority of images used in Canadian news coverage on the 2021 Heat Dome are incompatible with, and frequently contradict, evidence-based heat protective actions. Governments, public health agencies, and other stakeholders engaged in distributing heat preparedness messaging (e.g., journalists) should prioritize improving the images of extreme heat in news coverage to align with evidence-based public health messages. With rising global temperatures due to climate change and the associated increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme heat events, prioritizing these actions is critically important to offset the threat posed to public health.

Abstract Image

海滩日还是致命热浪?加拿大 2021 年热浪穹顶的媒体图片内容分析
在极端高温事件(EHE)期间,公众通常通过媒体了解健康保护行动。视觉新闻报道可以作为一种强有力的工具,帮助向公众传达复杂的健康防护行动。尽管图像在帮助公众了解风险方面非常重要,但目前还没有系统的分析来评估加拿大媒体在极端高温事件中使用了哪些图像。本文通过分析加拿大媒体在史无前例的 2021 年 "热穹顶 "期间是如何向公众直观传达极热风险的,有助于填补这一空白。我们在五个订阅新闻数据库中查阅了数千篇有关加拿大 2021 年高温穹顶的在线新闻媒体文章。总共对 845 张图片进行了编码,以确定其指称、内涵和意识形态内容。在这些发表的图片中,只有 16% 的图片暗示热是危险的,其中只有 40% 的图片描述了人,46% 的图片暗示了人类的痛苦。我们的研究结果表明,加拿大关于 2021 年热穹顶的新闻报道中使用的大多数图片与以证据为基础的防暑降温行动不符,而且经常相互矛盾。政府、公共卫生机构和其他参与发布防暑降温信息的利益相关者(如记者)应优先改善新闻报道中的极端高温形象,使其与基于证据的公共卫生信息保持一致。气候变化导致全球气温上升,极端高温事件的频率和强度也随之增加,因此优先采取这些行动对于抵消对公众健康的威胁至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climatic Change
Climatic Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Climatic Change is dedicated to the totality of the problem of climatic variability and change - its descriptions, causes, implications and interactions among these. The purpose of the journal is to provide a means of exchange among those working in different disciplines on problems related to climatic variations. This means that authors have an opportunity to communicate the essence of their studies to people in other climate-related disciplines and to interested non-disciplinarians, as well as to report on research in which the originality is in the combinations of (not necessarily original) work from several disciplines. The journal also includes vigorous editorial and book review sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信