Evaluating evidence supporting the relevancy of 4 psi as a blast overpressure value associated with brain health and performance outcomes following low-level blast overpressure exposure

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
S. S. Sloley, S. M. Turner
{"title":"Evaluating evidence supporting the relevancy of 4 psi as a blast overpressure value associated with brain health and performance outcomes following low-level blast overpressure exposure","authors":"S. S. Sloley, S. M. Turner","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01170-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evidence suggests that low-level blast (LLB) overpressure exposure from military heavy weapons training is associated with subclinical adverse brain health and performance (H &amp;P) outcomes. Existing DOD safety policies related to blast overpressure exposure are not specific to LLB-related brain health effects. This study sought to synthesize the available literature and analyze the relevancy of a specific blast metric to LLB exposures and the manifestation of adverse brain H &amp;P outcomes. A literature search yielded 311 unique articles, from which 220 were identified as human studies on LLB published from 2010 to 2021. After more exhaustive exclusion criteria were applied, 14 articles met the criteria for inclusion. Findings on brain H &amp;P changes were examined in relation to quantified LLB measurements (e.g., peak overpressure) to identify trends. Overall, the included studies suggested that alterations of reaction time, a metric for neurocognitive performance, as well as symptom reporting can occur following cumulative LLB exposures above 4 psi (27.6 kPa). Biomarkers and neurosensory changes have not demonstrated consistent associations with LLB exposures. These findings suggest that cumulative blast overpressure exposures above 4 psi (27.6 kPa) based on current measurement methodologies for body-worn sensors may be associated with adverse brain H &amp;P outcomes. Current research efforts seek to better quantify LLB exposure, the relationships between LLB (e.g., intensity, duration, dose) and brain health, as well as to assess brain H &amp;P domains more comprehensively. These efforts will serve to promote a better understanding of the interaction between LLB exposures and adverse brain H &amp;P outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-024-01170-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests that low-level blast (LLB) overpressure exposure from military heavy weapons training is associated with subclinical adverse brain health and performance (H &P) outcomes. Existing DOD safety policies related to blast overpressure exposure are not specific to LLB-related brain health effects. This study sought to synthesize the available literature and analyze the relevancy of a specific blast metric to LLB exposures and the manifestation of adverse brain H &P outcomes. A literature search yielded 311 unique articles, from which 220 were identified as human studies on LLB published from 2010 to 2021. After more exhaustive exclusion criteria were applied, 14 articles met the criteria for inclusion. Findings on brain H &P changes were examined in relation to quantified LLB measurements (e.g., peak overpressure) to identify trends. Overall, the included studies suggested that alterations of reaction time, a metric for neurocognitive performance, as well as symptom reporting can occur following cumulative LLB exposures above 4 psi (27.6 kPa). Biomarkers and neurosensory changes have not demonstrated consistent associations with LLB exposures. These findings suggest that cumulative blast overpressure exposures above 4 psi (27.6 kPa) based on current measurement methodologies for body-worn sensors may be associated with adverse brain H &P outcomes. Current research efforts seek to better quantify LLB exposure, the relationships between LLB (e.g., intensity, duration, dose) and brain health, as well as to assess brain H &P domains more comprehensively. These efforts will serve to promote a better understanding of the interaction between LLB exposures and adverse brain H &P outcomes.

评估支持 4 psi 爆炸超压值与低水平爆炸超压暴露后大脑健康和性能结果相关性的证据
有证据表明,军事重武器训练中的低水平爆炸(LLB)超压暴露与亚临床不良脑健康和性能(H &P )结果有关。国防部现有的与爆炸超压暴露相关的安全政策并未专门针对与 LLB 相关的脑健康影响。本研究试图综合现有文献,分析特定爆炸指标与低爆暴露的相关性以及脑部 H &P 不良后果的表现。通过文献检索获得了 311 篇文章,其中 220 篇被确定为 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的有关低放炮弹的人类研究。在采用更详尽的排除标准后,有14篇文章符合纳入标准。研究人员结合量化的 LLB 测量值(如过压峰值)对大脑 H &P 变化的研究结果进行了分析,以确定趋势。总体而言,纳入的研究表明,在暴露于超过 4 psi(27.6 kPa)的累积 LLB 后,反应时间(一种神经认知性能指标)以及症状报告都会发生变化。生物标志物和神经感觉的变化并未显示出与 LLB 暴露有一致的联系。这些研究结果表明,根据目前的体戴式传感器测量方法,超过 4 psi (27.6 kPa) 的累积爆炸超压暴露可能与不良的脑 H &P 结果有关。目前的研究工作旨在更好地量化 LLB 暴露、LLB(如强度、持续时间、剂量)与大脑健康之间的关系,以及更全面地评估大脑 H &P 领域。这些努力将有助于更好地理解低辐射暴露与不良脑 Hamp;P 结果之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shock Waves
Shock Waves 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
17.4 months
期刊介绍: Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization. The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine. Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community. The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信