New data and taxonomic changes influence our understanding of biogeographic patterns: A case study in Australian skinks

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
T. Flanagan, G. M. Shea, U. Roll, R. Tingley, S. Meiri, D. G. Chapple
{"title":"New data and taxonomic changes influence our understanding of biogeographic patterns: A case study in Australian skinks","authors":"T. Flanagan,&nbsp;G. M. Shea,&nbsp;U. Roll,&nbsp;R. Tingley,&nbsp;S. Meiri,&nbsp;D. G. Chapple","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Species are the most commonly used unit of biogeography research, and in many conservation schemes. For many faunal groups, taxonomy is in a constant state of flux, with new species being described, and our concept of existing species regularly being refined. Using the most diverse lineage of Australian lizards (460+ species), the skinks (Family Scincidae), we quantified the impacts of taxonomic changes over time on our understanding of species richness, endemism and beta diversity. We generated surfaces of species richness, endemism and beta diversity from four editions (1975, 1988, 2000, 2014) of an authoritative field guide to understand how taxonomic shifts, and enhanced biogeographic knowledge, influenced the inferred biogeographic patterns in Australian skinks. The number of recognized Australian skink species has increased 2.3-fold since 1975. The Wet Tropics was the major hotspot for (mostly locally endemic) species additions. Hotspots of species richness and beta diversity remained broadly similar over time, but some important local hotspots shifted. Endemism hotspots were weakly associated with hotspots of species additions over time except in the Wet Tropics. The major shifts in biogeographic patterns, which were not associated with taxonomic changes, resulted from better knowledge of species distributions through time. We hypothesize that the effects of taxonomy on biogeographic patterns we found generalize across clades and regions—especially away from major research hotspots. We suggest an understanding of the impact of taxonomic changes on conservation priorities for particular regions and taxonomic groups is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.13173","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species are the most commonly used unit of biogeography research, and in many conservation schemes. For many faunal groups, taxonomy is in a constant state of flux, with new species being described, and our concept of existing species regularly being refined. Using the most diverse lineage of Australian lizards (460+ species), the skinks (Family Scincidae), we quantified the impacts of taxonomic changes over time on our understanding of species richness, endemism and beta diversity. We generated surfaces of species richness, endemism and beta diversity from four editions (1975, 1988, 2000, 2014) of an authoritative field guide to understand how taxonomic shifts, and enhanced biogeographic knowledge, influenced the inferred biogeographic patterns in Australian skinks. The number of recognized Australian skink species has increased 2.3-fold since 1975. The Wet Tropics was the major hotspot for (mostly locally endemic) species additions. Hotspots of species richness and beta diversity remained broadly similar over time, but some important local hotspots shifted. Endemism hotspots were weakly associated with hotspots of species additions over time except in the Wet Tropics. The major shifts in biogeographic patterns, which were not associated with taxonomic changes, resulted from better knowledge of species distributions through time. We hypothesize that the effects of taxonomy on biogeographic patterns we found generalize across clades and regions—especially away from major research hotspots. We suggest an understanding of the impact of taxonomic changes on conservation priorities for particular regions and taxonomic groups is needed.

Abstract Image

新数据和分类变化影响着我们对生物地理模式的理解:澳大利亚石龙子案例研究
物种是生物地理学研究和许多保护计划中最常用的单位。对于许多动物群落来说,分类学处于不断变化之中,新物种不断出现,我们对现有物种的概念也在不断完善。我们利用澳大利亚蜥蜴(460 多个物种)中最多样化的种类--石龙子(石龙子科),量化了分类学随时间推移发生的变化对我们了解物种丰富度、特有性和β多样性的影响。我们从权威野外指南的四个版本(1975 年、1988 年、2000 年和 2014 年)中生成了物种丰富度、特有性和β多样性的表面,以了解分类学的变化和生物地理学知识的增强如何影响推断出的澳大利亚石龙子的生物地理格局。自 1975 年以来,公认的澳大利亚石龙子物种数量增加了 2.3 倍。湿热带是物种(主要是当地特有物种)增加的主要热点地区。随着时间的推移,物种丰富度和贝塔多样性的热点地区大致相同,但一些重要的局部热点地区发生了变化。随着时间的推移,除湿热带地区外,特有性热点地区与物种增加热点地区的关联性很弱。生物地理格局的主要变化与分类学变化无关,是由于随着时间的推移对物种分布有了更好的了解。我们假设,我们发现的分类学对生物地理格局的影响会在不同支系和地区普遍存在,尤其是在远离主要研究热点的地区。我们建议,需要了解分类学变化对特定地区和分类群保护重点的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信