Spring Wheat Harvest under the Complex Agrotechnological Effect with Different Moisture Levels in the South of Western Siberia

V. I. Usenko, A. A. Garkusha, T. A. Litvintseva, E. G. Deryanova, A. A. Shcherbakova, I. A. Kobzeva
{"title":"Spring Wheat Harvest under the Complex Agrotechnological Effect with Different Moisture Levels in the South of Western Siberia","authors":"V. I. Usenko, A. A. Garkusha, T. A. Litvintseva, E. G. Deryanova, A. A. Shcherbakova, I. A. Kobzeva","doi":"10.3103/s1068367424010154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Studies to assess the effectiveness of an integrated effect of agrotechnological techniques (fertilizers, pesticides, tillage, and predecessors) and agrometeorological conditions on the harvest of spring wheat have been carried out in 2011–2023. The work was performed on leached low-power low-humus medium-loamy chernozem in Altai krai. The scheme of the stationary field experiment established in 2000 assumed the study of the following variants: (factor A) tillage: deep tillage (25–27 cm), surface tillage (14–16 cm), subsurface tillage, and the variant without tillage; (factor B) fertilizers: without fertilizers, presowing fertilizer (ammophos), basic fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) + presowing fertilizer; and (factor C) pesticides: without pesticides, dicoticides, dicoticides + graminicides, and dicoticides + graminicides + insecticides + fungicides. Wheat predecessors were created in the fallow (no-tillage–rapeseed)–wheat–oats–wheat–peas–wheat rotation and with permanent cultivation of wheat. The wheat yield (t/ha) after predecessors without fertilizers and pesticides averaged 1.53 for fallow, 1.27 for peas, 1.06 for oats, and 0.81 for permanent sowing. The dependence (<i>r</i>) of yield on May–June moisture conditions for these predecessors increased from 0.628 to 0.705, 0.870, and 0.918, respectively. The contribution of soil tillage (%) to the wheat yield variation decreased from fallow and peas (26.9–58.0%) to oats and permanent sowing (1.3–2.5%) and that of fertilizers and pesticides increased from 10.0 to 53.2% and from 29.7 to 51.5%, respectively. The yield increase (t/ha) after fertilization with ammophos at sowing decreased from fallow (0.15 t/ha) to peas (0.11 t/ha), oats (0.10 t/ha), and permanent sowing (0.08 t/ha), while the use of basic fertilization with ammonium nitrate led to its increase from 0.19 and 0.18 to 0.31 and 0.22 t/ha. Under good moisture conditions, the effectiveness of fertilizers increased by 1.5–2.0 times with increase in saturation with pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":21531,"journal":{"name":"Russian Agricultural Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068367424010154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies to assess the effectiveness of an integrated effect of agrotechnological techniques (fertilizers, pesticides, tillage, and predecessors) and agrometeorological conditions on the harvest of spring wheat have been carried out in 2011–2023. The work was performed on leached low-power low-humus medium-loamy chernozem in Altai krai. The scheme of the stationary field experiment established in 2000 assumed the study of the following variants: (factor A) tillage: deep tillage (25–27 cm), surface tillage (14–16 cm), subsurface tillage, and the variant without tillage; (factor B) fertilizers: without fertilizers, presowing fertilizer (ammophos), basic fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) + presowing fertilizer; and (factor C) pesticides: without pesticides, dicoticides, dicoticides + graminicides, and dicoticides + graminicides + insecticides + fungicides. Wheat predecessors were created in the fallow (no-tillage–rapeseed)–wheat–oats–wheat–peas–wheat rotation and with permanent cultivation of wheat. The wheat yield (t/ha) after predecessors without fertilizers and pesticides averaged 1.53 for fallow, 1.27 for peas, 1.06 for oats, and 0.81 for permanent sowing. The dependence (r) of yield on May–June moisture conditions for these predecessors increased from 0.628 to 0.705, 0.870, and 0.918, respectively. The contribution of soil tillage (%) to the wheat yield variation decreased from fallow and peas (26.9–58.0%) to oats and permanent sowing (1.3–2.5%) and that of fertilizers and pesticides increased from 10.0 to 53.2% and from 29.7 to 51.5%, respectively. The yield increase (t/ha) after fertilization with ammophos at sowing decreased from fallow (0.15 t/ha) to peas (0.11 t/ha), oats (0.10 t/ha), and permanent sowing (0.08 t/ha), while the use of basic fertilization with ammonium nitrate led to its increase from 0.19 and 0.18 to 0.31 and 0.22 t/ha. Under good moisture conditions, the effectiveness of fertilizers increased by 1.5–2.0 times with increase in saturation with pesticides.

西西伯利亚南部不同湿度条件下春小麦收获的复杂农业技术效应
摘要 2011-2023 年开展了一项研究,以评估农业技术(化肥、农药、耕作和前茬作物)和农业气象条件对春小麦收获的综合影响。这项工作是在阿尔泰边疆区沥滤的低功率、低腐殖质的中壤切尔诺泽姆进行的。2000 年制定的固定田间试验计划假定研究以下变量:(A)耕作:深耕(25-27 厘米)、表层耕作(14-16 厘米)、表层下耕作和不耕作变量;(B)肥料:不施化肥、播种前施肥(磷胺)、基肥(硝酸铵)+播种前施肥;(因素 C)杀虫剂:不施杀虫剂、杀滴滴涕、杀滴滴涕+杀草剂、杀滴滴涕+杀草剂+杀虫剂+杀菌剂。小麦前身是在休耕(免耕-油菜籽)-小麦-燕麦-小麦-豌豆-小麦轮作和长期种植小麦的情况下产生的。在不施用化肥和农药的情况下,休耕、豌豆、燕麦和永久性播种后的小麦平均产量(吨/公顷)分别为 1.53、1.27、1.06 和 0.81。这些前作的产量对 5-6 月水分条件的依赖性(r)分别从 0.628 增加到 0.705、0.870 和 0.918。从休耕和豌豆(26.9-58.0%)到燕麦和永久性播种(1.3-2.5%),土壤耕作对小麦产量变化的贡献率(%)有所下降,化肥和农药的贡献率分别从 10.0%增至 53.2%,从 29.7%增至 51.5%。播种时施磷肥后的增产(吨/公顷)从休耕(0.15 吨/公顷)降至豌豆(0.11 吨/公顷)、燕麦(0.10 吨/公顷)和永久播种(0.08 吨/公顷),而施用硝酸铵基肥后的增产(吨/公顷)从 0.19 吨/公顷和 0.18 吨/公顷增至 0.31 吨/公顷和 0.22 吨/公顷。在水分充足的条件下,随着农药饱和度的提高,肥料的有效性增加了 1.5-2.0 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信