Intraoperative trypan blue central landmark and its use in capsulotomy and capsulorhexis centration

Pavel Stodulka, Richard Packard, David Mordaunt
{"title":"Intraoperative trypan blue central landmark and its use in capsulotomy and capsulorhexis centration","authors":"Pavel Stodulka, Richard Packard, David Mordaunt","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare 3 capsulotomy centration methods. Setting: Private clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic. Design: Prospective, consecutive case series. Methods: 180 eyes undergoing cataract surgery had anterior capsule staining with microfiltered 0.4% trypan blue solution before selective laser capsulotomy. The first 60 eyes (Group 1) had mydriatic dilated pupil centered capsulotomies. The next 60 eyes (Group 2) were centered on the trypan blue central landmark (TCL). The final 60 capsulotomies (Group 3) were centered on the patient fixated coaxial Purkinje reflex (CPR). Measurements between key anatomical landmarks and the TCL, CPR capsulotomies, and implanted intraocular lens (IOL) center were made. Results: The TCL, observed in >94% of eyes in the study, coincided with the CPR with a displacement of <0.1 ± 0.1 mm. Group 1 capsulotomies were noticeably decentered on the IOLs by 0.3 ± 0.2 mm. The Group 2 symmetrical IOL relationship was maintained with a decentration of 0.15 ± 0.1 mm. Group 3 had a similar decentration with the IOLs with 0.15 ± 0.1 mm. Verification with IOLMaster 700 data and CALLISTO Eye System showed that the CPR and the TCL were coincident with the measured visual axis. Conclusions: The clearly visible TCL served as an alternate landmark to the patient fixated CPR, and being on the anterior capsule was not sensitive to tilt. Further patient compliance was not required. Both were superior to dilated pupil centration, to achieve symmetric IOL coverage. This has application for both capsulotomies and capsulorhexes.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare 3 capsulotomy centration methods. Setting: Private clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic. Design: Prospective, consecutive case series. Methods: 180 eyes undergoing cataract surgery had anterior capsule staining with microfiltered 0.4% trypan blue solution before selective laser capsulotomy. The first 60 eyes (Group 1) had mydriatic dilated pupil centered capsulotomies. The next 60 eyes (Group 2) were centered on the trypan blue central landmark (TCL). The final 60 capsulotomies (Group 3) were centered on the patient fixated coaxial Purkinje reflex (CPR). Measurements between key anatomical landmarks and the TCL, CPR capsulotomies, and implanted intraocular lens (IOL) center were made. Results: The TCL, observed in >94% of eyes in the study, coincided with the CPR with a displacement of <0.1 ± 0.1 mm. Group 1 capsulotomies were noticeably decentered on the IOLs by 0.3 ± 0.2 mm. The Group 2 symmetrical IOL relationship was maintained with a decentration of 0.15 ± 0.1 mm. Group 3 had a similar decentration with the IOLs with 0.15 ± 0.1 mm. Verification with IOLMaster 700 data and CALLISTO Eye System showed that the CPR and the TCL were coincident with the measured visual axis. Conclusions: The clearly visible TCL served as an alternate landmark to the patient fixated CPR, and being on the anterior capsule was not sensitive to tilt. Further patient compliance was not required. Both were superior to dilated pupil centration, to achieve symmetric IOL coverage. This has application for both capsulotomies and capsulorhexes.
术中胰蓝中心地标及其在巩膜切开术和巩膜对中中的应用
目的: 比较 3 种胶囊切除术中心定位方法。地点: 捷克兹林私人诊所捷克共和国兹林私人诊所。设计:前瞻性连续病例系列。方法:180 只接受白内障手术的眼睛在选择性激光囊袋切开术前用微过滤的 0.4% 胰盼蓝溶液进行前囊染色。前 60 只眼睛(第 1 组)进行了以瞳孔散大为中心的囊膜切开术。接下来的 60 只眼睛(第 2 组)以胰蓝中心地标(TCL)为中心进行囊肿切开术。最后 60 只眼睛(第 3 组)的囊切以患者固定的同轴普肯野反射(CPR)为中心。测量主要解剖地标与 TCL、CPR 包膜和植入的眼内人工晶体(IOL)中心之间的距离。结果:研究中,94% 的眼睛观察到 TCL 与 CPR 重合,位移为 0.1 ± 0.1 mm。第 1 组的囊膜明显偏离人工晶体 0.3 ± 0.2 毫米。第 2 组的对称 IOL 关系保持不变,偏心 0.15 ± 0.1 毫米。第 3 组与人工晶体的偏斜度相似,为 0.15 ± 0.1 毫米。IOLMaster 700 数据和 CALLISTO 眼科系统的验证表明,CPR 和 TCL 与测量的视轴重合。结论:清晰可见的 TCL 是患者固定 CPR 的替代地标,位于前囊上对倾斜不敏感。患者无需进一步配合。这两种方法都优于散瞳定点,可实现对称的人工晶体覆盖。这种方法适用于囊肿切开术和囊肿切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信