Clinical Outcomes of Salvage Microsurgical Resection after Radiation Therapy for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Omid Moshtaghi, Patrick Barba, Peter Dixon, Yin Ren, Marc Schwartz, Rick Friedman
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Salvage Microsurgical Resection after Radiation Therapy for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas","authors":"Omid Moshtaghi, Patrick Barba, Peter Dixon, Yin Ren, Marc Schwartz, Rick Friedman","doi":"10.1055/a-2297-3849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n<b>Background</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after salvage microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated initially with modern radiotherapy techniques as compared to those treated with primary microsurgical resection.</p> <p>\n<b>Methods</b> Patients who underwent microsurgical resection of sporadic VS undergoing a translabyrinthine approach at a single academic skull base tertiary referral center were included. Baseline and postoperative dynamic gait index, functional gait assessment, House–Brackmann facial nerve grading, and completeness of resection were prospectively recorded.</p> <p>\n<b>Results</b> Of the 265 patients reviewed, 21 (7.9%) patients underwent prior radiation. Median age of the cohort was 55 years (interquartile range: 51–63). The likelihood of achieving a gross total resection was significantly lower for radiated as compared to nonradiated patients (odds ratio: 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.05–0.53, <i>p</i> = 0.004) when controlling for tumor size. Radiated patients had better postoperative facial nerve function on the first postoperative day, but this difference was not significant at long-term follow-up. Radiated patients had lower preoperative postural stability scores than nonradiated patients on FGA (26 vs. 23, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Postoperatively, radiated patients had comparable outcomes compared to nonradiated patients when controlling for age and tumor size.</p> <p>\n<b>Conclusions</b> Compared to patients with VS treated with surgery alone, previously radiated patients are less likely to achieve gross total resection in the salvage setting. Radiated patients scored better on facial nerve outcomes compared to nonradiated patients in the initial postoperative period but demonstrated similar long-term outcomes.</p> ","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2297-3849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after salvage microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated initially with modern radiotherapy techniques as compared to those treated with primary microsurgical resection.

Methods Patients who underwent microsurgical resection of sporadic VS undergoing a translabyrinthine approach at a single academic skull base tertiary referral center were included. Baseline and postoperative dynamic gait index, functional gait assessment, House–Brackmann facial nerve grading, and completeness of resection were prospectively recorded.

Results Of the 265 patients reviewed, 21 (7.9%) patients underwent prior radiation. Median age of the cohort was 55 years (interquartile range: 51–63). The likelihood of achieving a gross total resection was significantly lower for radiated as compared to nonradiated patients (odds ratio: 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.05–0.53, p = 0.004) when controlling for tumor size. Radiated patients had better postoperative facial nerve function on the first postoperative day, but this difference was not significant at long-term follow-up. Radiated patients had lower preoperative postural stability scores than nonradiated patients on FGA (26 vs. 23, p = 0.035). Postoperatively, radiated patients had comparable outcomes compared to nonradiated patients when controlling for age and tumor size.

Conclusions Compared to patients with VS treated with surgery alone, previously radiated patients are less likely to achieve gross total resection in the salvage setting. Radiated patients scored better on facial nerve outcomes compared to nonradiated patients in the initial postoperative period but demonstrated similar long-term outcomes.

放疗后对散发性前庭花叶病毒瘤进行挽救性显微外科切除术的临床结果
研究背景 本研究的目的是评估前庭分裂瘤(VS)经现代放疗技术初步治疗后,与经显微外科手术原发切除术治疗的前庭分裂瘤相比,显微外科手术挽救治疗后的临床疗效。方法 纳入在一家学术性颅底三级转诊中心接受迷宫径路显微手术切除散发性 VS 的患者。前瞻性地记录了基线和术后动态步态指数、功能步态评估、House-Brackmann面神经分级以及切除的完整性。结果 在接受复查的265名患者中,21人(7.9%)曾接受过放射治疗。组群的中位年龄为 55 岁(四分位间范围:51-63)。在控制肿瘤大小的情况下,接受过放射治疗的患者与未接受放射治疗的患者相比,实现大体全切除的可能性明显较低(几率比:0.18,95% 置信区间:0.05-0.53,P = 0.004)。接受放射治疗的患者术后第一天的面神经功能较好,但在长期随访中这一差异并不显著。放射治疗患者的术前 FGA 体位稳定性评分低于非放射治疗患者(26 分比 23 分,P = 0.035)。术后,在控制年龄和肿瘤大小的情况下,放射治疗患者的疗效与非放射治疗患者相当。结论 与单独接受手术治疗的VS患者相比,曾接受过放射治疗的患者在抢救过程中实现大体全切除的可能性较小。与未接受放射治疗的患者相比,接受放射治疗的患者在术后初期的面神经治疗效果更好,但长期治疗效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
516
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies. JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信