Modeling dike trajectories in a biaxial stress field with coupled magma flow, fracture, and elasticity

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laura A. Blackstone, Benjamin E. Grossman-Ponemon, Elías R. Heimisson, Adrian J. Lew, Paul Segall
{"title":"Modeling dike trajectories in a biaxial stress field with coupled magma flow, fracture, and elasticity","authors":"Laura A. Blackstone, Benjamin E. Grossman-Ponemon, Elías R. Heimisson, Adrian J. Lew, Paul Segall","doi":"10.1007/s00445-024-01734-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Because dike propagation depends on stress state, the geometry of dikes can be used to make inferences about crustal stress conditions during emplacement. Early work relied on analytical solutions for stress in a two-dimensional elastic medium with a pressurized circular magma chamber and biaxial far-field stress. The principal stress trajectories in this classical model depend on the ratio of deviatoric stress magnitude to chamber pressure. Assuming dikes follow principal stress trajectories and bounding plausible magma chamber excess pressures lead to estimates of deviatoric stress magnitudes from the map pattern of dikes. Mériaux and Lister (2002) pointed out that this approach ignored stresses due to the magma-filled dikes themselves, which significantly alter predicted dike trajectories. They estimated deviatoric stresses 2 to 5 times previous estimates. However, Mériaux and Lister (2002) assumed the pressure distribution within the dike rather than computing it from viscous magma flow. We revisit this simplification using a 2D model which fully couples a linear elastic host rock with a pressurized chamber and a fluid-filled dike, assuming the lubrication approximation for viscous flow. This model is solved using the finite element method (FEM). Ensuring that dike propagation is stable limits the dike-tip cavity pressure for realistic fracture toughness. We find that computed trajectories fall between the classical principal stress and Mériaux and Lister (2002) trajectories for given regional stress and chamber pressure conditions. This leads to deviatoric stress magnitude estimates that are 1 to 2 times the classical estimates, and 1/2 to 1/3 the Mériaux and Lister (2002) estimates. We also explore the consequences of chamber depressurization due to magma outflow during dike propagation. For a given melt compressibility, the resulting trajectories align more closely with those obtained from the classical model, compared to those obtained assuming a constant chamber pressure. At higher ratios of tectonic stress to chamber pressure, the trajectories are nearly identical. In both the constant pressure and depressurizing chamber cases, our results suggest that realistic magma pressure profiles within a dike lead to smaller estimated ratios of deviatoric stress to chamber pressure than found by Mériaux and Lister (2002). Future work should extend dike propagation models to three dimensions, and more thoroughly explore effects of magma compressibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":55297,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Volcanology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Volcanology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-024-01734-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because dike propagation depends on stress state, the geometry of dikes can be used to make inferences about crustal stress conditions during emplacement. Early work relied on analytical solutions for stress in a two-dimensional elastic medium with a pressurized circular magma chamber and biaxial far-field stress. The principal stress trajectories in this classical model depend on the ratio of deviatoric stress magnitude to chamber pressure. Assuming dikes follow principal stress trajectories and bounding plausible magma chamber excess pressures lead to estimates of deviatoric stress magnitudes from the map pattern of dikes. Mériaux and Lister (2002) pointed out that this approach ignored stresses due to the magma-filled dikes themselves, which significantly alter predicted dike trajectories. They estimated deviatoric stresses 2 to 5 times previous estimates. However, Mériaux and Lister (2002) assumed the pressure distribution within the dike rather than computing it from viscous magma flow. We revisit this simplification using a 2D model which fully couples a linear elastic host rock with a pressurized chamber and a fluid-filled dike, assuming the lubrication approximation for viscous flow. This model is solved using the finite element method (FEM). Ensuring that dike propagation is stable limits the dike-tip cavity pressure for realistic fracture toughness. We find that computed trajectories fall between the classical principal stress and Mériaux and Lister (2002) trajectories for given regional stress and chamber pressure conditions. This leads to deviatoric stress magnitude estimates that are 1 to 2 times the classical estimates, and 1/2 to 1/3 the Mériaux and Lister (2002) estimates. We also explore the consequences of chamber depressurization due to magma outflow during dike propagation. For a given melt compressibility, the resulting trajectories align more closely with those obtained from the classical model, compared to those obtained assuming a constant chamber pressure. At higher ratios of tectonic stress to chamber pressure, the trajectories are nearly identical. In both the constant pressure and depressurizing chamber cases, our results suggest that realistic magma pressure profiles within a dike lead to smaller estimated ratios of deviatoric stress to chamber pressure than found by Mériaux and Lister (2002). Future work should extend dike propagation models to three dimensions, and more thoroughly explore effects of magma compressibility.

Abstract Image

利用岩浆流、断裂和弹性耦合模拟双轴应力场中的堤坝轨迹
由于堤坝的扩展取决于应力状态,因此可以利用堤坝的几何形状来推断地壳在堆积过程中的应力状况。早期的工作依赖于对二维弹性介质中的应力进行分析求解,该介质具有加压圆形岩浆室和双轴远场应力。这一经典模型中的主应力轨迹取决于偏差应力大小与岩浆腔压力的比率。假定岩穴遵循主应力轨迹,并以可信的岩浆室超压为界,就可以从岩穴的分布图中估算出偏离应力大小。Mériaux 和 Lister(2002 年)指出,这种方法忽略了充满岩浆的岩穴本身所产生的应力,而这些应力会显著改变预测的岩穴轨迹。他们估计的偏差应力是之前估计值的 2 到 5 倍。然而,Mériaux 和 Lister(2002 年)假定了岩浆堤内的压力分布,而不是通过粘性岩浆流来计算压力分布。我们使用一个二维模型对这一简化进行了重新研究,该模型将线性弹性主岩与加压腔体和充满流体的岩堤完全耦合在一起,并假设粘性流动为润滑近似值。该模型采用有限元法(FEM)求解。为确保堤坝传播的稳定性,我们限制了堤坝顶端空腔压力,以获得真实的断裂韧性。我们发现,在给定的区域应力和腔压条件下,计算出的轨迹介于经典主应力轨迹和梅里奥克斯与李斯特(2002 年)轨迹之间。这导致偏差应力大小估计值是经典估计值的 1 到 2 倍,是 Mériaux 和 Lister(2002 年)估计值的 1/2 到 1/3。我们还探讨了岩浆在堤坝扩展过程中流出造成的岩室减压后果。在给定的熔体可压缩性条件下,得出的轨迹与经典模型得出的轨迹更接近,而不是假设腔室压力恒定时得出的轨迹。在构造应力与腔室压力比率较高的情况下,两者的轨迹几乎相同。在恒压和减压室两种情况下,我们的结果表明,堤内岩浆压力剖面的实际情况导致偏离应力与岩室压力的估计比率小于 Mériaux 和 Lister(2002 年)的发现。未来的工作应将堤坝传播模型扩展到三维空间,并更深入地探讨岩浆可压缩性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Volcanology
Bulletin of Volcanology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Volcanology was founded in 1922, as Bulletin Volcanologique, and is the official journal of the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI). The Bulletin of Volcanology publishes papers on volcanoes, their products, their eruptive behavior, and their hazards. Papers aimed at understanding the deeper structure of volcanoes, and the evolution of magmatic systems using geochemical, petrological, and geophysical techniques are also published. Material is published in four sections: Review Articles; Research Articles; Short Scientific Communications; and a Forum that provides for discussion of controversial issues and for comment and reply on previously published Articles and Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信