Margaret F. Bedillion, Eric D. Claus, Stephanie E. Wemm, Helen C. Fox, Emily B. Ansell
{"title":"The effects of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use on subjective drug effects: A narrative review across methodologies","authors":"Margaret F. Bedillion, Eric D. Claus, Stephanie E. Wemm, Helen C. Fox, Emily B. Ansell","doi":"10.1111/acer.15322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over 75% of young adults who use cannabis also report drinking alcohol, leading to increased risks that include impaired cognition, substance use disorders, and more heavy and frequent substance use. Studies suggest that subjective responses to either alcohol or cannabis can serve as a valuable indicator for identifying individuals at risk of prolonged substance use and use disorder. While laboratory studies show additive effects when alcohol and cannabis are used together, the impact of co-using these substances, specifically with respect to cannabidiol, on an individual's subjective experience remains unclear. This narrative review explores the effects of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis (SAM) use on subjective drug effects, drawing from qualitative research, laboratory experiments, and naturalistic studies. Experimental findings are inconsistent regarding the combined effects of alcohol and cannabis, likely influenced by factors such as dosage, method of administration, and individual substance use histories. Similarly, findings from qualitative and naturalistic studies are mixed regarding subjective drug effects following SAM use. These discrepancies may be due to recall biases, variations in assessment methods, and the measurement in real-world contexts of patterns of SAM use and related experiences. Overall, this narrative review highlights the need for more comprehensive research to understand more fully subjective drug effects of SAM use in diverse populations and settings, emphasizing the importance of frequent and nuanced assessment of SAM use and subjective responses in naturalistic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.15322","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over 75% of young adults who use cannabis also report drinking alcohol, leading to increased risks that include impaired cognition, substance use disorders, and more heavy and frequent substance use. Studies suggest that subjective responses to either alcohol or cannabis can serve as a valuable indicator for identifying individuals at risk of prolonged substance use and use disorder. While laboratory studies show additive effects when alcohol and cannabis are used together, the impact of co-using these substances, specifically with respect to cannabidiol, on an individual's subjective experience remains unclear. This narrative review explores the effects of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis (SAM) use on subjective drug effects, drawing from qualitative research, laboratory experiments, and naturalistic studies. Experimental findings are inconsistent regarding the combined effects of alcohol and cannabis, likely influenced by factors such as dosage, method of administration, and individual substance use histories. Similarly, findings from qualitative and naturalistic studies are mixed regarding subjective drug effects following SAM use. These discrepancies may be due to recall biases, variations in assessment methods, and the measurement in real-world contexts of patterns of SAM use and related experiences. Overall, this narrative review highlights the need for more comprehensive research to understand more fully subjective drug effects of SAM use in diverse populations and settings, emphasizing the importance of frequent and nuanced assessment of SAM use and subjective responses in naturalistic settings.
超过 75% 的吸食大麻的年轻成年人也会饮酒,从而导致认知能力受损、药物使用失调以及更大量、更频繁地使用药物等风险增加。研究表明,对酒精或大麻的主观反应可以作为一个有价值的指标,用于识别有长期使用药物和使用障碍风险的个人。虽然实验室研究显示同时使用酒精和大麻会产生叠加效应,但同时使用这两种物质(特别是大麻二酚)对个人主观体验的影响仍不清楚。这篇叙述性综述从定性研究、实验室实验和自然研究中探讨了同时使用酒精和大麻(SAM)对药物主观效应的影响。关于酒精和大麻的综合效应,实验结果并不一致,可能受到剂量、给药方法和个人药物使用史等因素的影响。同样,关于使用 SAM 后的主观药物效应,定性研究和自然研究的结果也不尽相同。这些差异可能是由于回忆偏差、评估方法的不同以及在现实世界中对 SAM 使用模式和相关经历的测量造成的。总之,本叙述性综述强调需要进行更全面的研究,以更充分地了解在不同人群和环境中使用苯丙胺类兴奋剂所产生的主观药物效应,并强调在自然环境中对苯丙胺类兴奋剂的使用和主观反应进行频繁而细致的评估的重要性。