The influence of drug class on reward in substance use disorders

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jermaine D. Jones , Caroline A. Arout , Rachel Luba , Dillon Murugesan , Gabriela Madera , Liam Gorsuch , Rebecca Schusterman , Suky Martinez
{"title":"The influence of drug class on reward in substance use disorders","authors":"Jermaine D. Jones ,&nbsp;Caroline A. Arout ,&nbsp;Rachel Luba ,&nbsp;Dillon Murugesan ,&nbsp;Gabriela Madera ,&nbsp;Liam Gorsuch ,&nbsp;Rebecca Schusterman ,&nbsp;Suky Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the United States, the societal costs associated with drug use surpass $500 billion annually. The rewarding and reinforcing properties that drive the use of these addictive substances are typically examined concerning the neurobiological effects responsible for their abuse potential. In this review, terms such as “abuse potential,” “drug,” and “addictive properties” are used due to their relevance to the methodological, theoretical, and conceptual framework for understanding the phenomenon of drug-taking behavior and the associated body of preclinical and clinical literature. The use of these terms is not intended to cast aspersions on individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). Understanding what motivates substance use has been a focus of SUD research for decades. Much of this corpus of work has focused on the shared effects of each drug class to increase dopaminergic transmission within the central reward pathways of the brain, or the “reward center.” However, the precise influence of each drug class on dopamine signaling, and the extent thereof, differs considerably. Furthermore, the aforementioned substances have effects on several neurobiological targets that mediate and modulate their addictive properties. The current manuscript sought to review the influence of drug class on the rewarding effects of each of the major pharmacological classes of addictive drugs (i.e., psychostimulants, opioids, nicotine, alcohol, and cannabinoids). Our review suggests that even subtle differences in drug effects can result in significant variability in the subjective experience of the drug, altering rewarding and other reinforcing effects. Additionally, this review will argue that reward (i.e., the attractive and motivational property of a stimulus) alone is not sufficient to explain the abuse liability of these substances. Instead, abuse potential is best examined as a function of both positive and negative reinforcing drug effects (i.e., stimuli that the subject will work to attain and stimuli that the subject will work to end or avoid, respectively). Though reward is central to drug use, the factors that motivate and maintain drug taking are varied and complex, with much to be elucidated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 173771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305724000650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, the societal costs associated with drug use surpass $500 billion annually. The rewarding and reinforcing properties that drive the use of these addictive substances are typically examined concerning the neurobiological effects responsible for their abuse potential. In this review, terms such as “abuse potential,” “drug,” and “addictive properties” are used due to their relevance to the methodological, theoretical, and conceptual framework for understanding the phenomenon of drug-taking behavior and the associated body of preclinical and clinical literature. The use of these terms is not intended to cast aspersions on individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). Understanding what motivates substance use has been a focus of SUD research for decades. Much of this corpus of work has focused on the shared effects of each drug class to increase dopaminergic transmission within the central reward pathways of the brain, or the “reward center.” However, the precise influence of each drug class on dopamine signaling, and the extent thereof, differs considerably. Furthermore, the aforementioned substances have effects on several neurobiological targets that mediate and modulate their addictive properties. The current manuscript sought to review the influence of drug class on the rewarding effects of each of the major pharmacological classes of addictive drugs (i.e., psychostimulants, opioids, nicotine, alcohol, and cannabinoids). Our review suggests that even subtle differences in drug effects can result in significant variability in the subjective experience of the drug, altering rewarding and other reinforcing effects. Additionally, this review will argue that reward (i.e., the attractive and motivational property of a stimulus) alone is not sufficient to explain the abuse liability of these substances. Instead, abuse potential is best examined as a function of both positive and negative reinforcing drug effects (i.e., stimuli that the subject will work to attain and stimuli that the subject will work to end or avoid, respectively). Though reward is central to drug use, the factors that motivate and maintain drug taking are varied and complex, with much to be elucidated.

药物类别对药物使用失调症奖赏的影响
在美国,与吸毒相关的社会成本每年超过 5000 亿美元。研究这些成瘾物质使用的奖励和强化特性时,通常会涉及导致其滥用潜力的神经生物学效应。在本综述中,使用了 "滥用潜力"、"药物 "和 "成瘾特性 "等术语,因为它们与理解服药行为现象的方法论、理论和概念框架以及相关的临床前和临床文献有关。使用这些术语并不是要诋毁药物使用障碍(SUD)患者。几十年来,了解药物使用的动机一直是 SUD 研究的重点。这些研究的大部分工作都集中在每一类药物在大脑中枢奖赏通路或 "奖赏中枢 "内增加多巴胺能传递的共同作用上。然而,每一类药物对多巴胺信号传导的确切影响及其程度却大相径庭。此外,上述物质还对多个神经生物学靶点产生影响,从而介导和调节其成瘾特性。本手稿试图回顾药物类别对每一类主要成瘾药物(即精神兴奋剂、阿片类药物、尼古丁、酒精和大麻类药物)奖赏效应的影响。我们的综述表明,即使药物作用存在细微差别,也会导致药物主观体验的显著变化,从而改变奖赏效应和其他强化效应。此外,本综述还将论证,仅凭奖赏(即刺激的吸引力和动机属性)不足以解释这些物质的滥用责任。相反,滥用可能性最好作为药物正强化效应和负强化效应(即受试者会努力获得的刺激和受试者会努力终止或避免的刺激)的函数来研究。虽然奖赏是吸毒的核心,但促使和维持吸毒的因素多种多样,十分复杂,还有许多有待阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信