Blocking mechanisms in area-selective ALD by small molecule inhibitors of different sizes: Steric shielding versus chemical passivation

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Pengmei Yu , Marc J.M. Merkx , Ilker Tezsevin , Paul C. Lemaire , Dennis M. Hausmann , Tania E. Sandoval , Wilhelmus M.M. Kessels , Adriaan J.M. Mackus
{"title":"Blocking mechanisms in area-selective ALD by small molecule inhibitors of different sizes: Steric shielding versus chemical passivation","authors":"Pengmei Yu ,&nbsp;Marc J.M. Merkx ,&nbsp;Ilker Tezsevin ,&nbsp;Paul C. Lemaire ,&nbsp;Dennis M. Hausmann ,&nbsp;Tania E. Sandoval ,&nbsp;Wilhelmus M.M. Kessels ,&nbsp;Adriaan J.M. Mackus","doi":"10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) hold great promise for area-selective deposition due to their vapor-phase application being compatible with industrial processing. However, to date only a handful of SMIs have been studied, and the mechanisms of precursor blocking require further understanding. In this study, we explore the inhibition of SiO<sub>2</sub> ALD on Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> surfaces comparing three SMIs of different sizes: acetic acid (HAc), acetylacetone (Hacac), and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedione (Hthd). The goal is to unravel the contributions of two important factors to their blocking performance: steric shielding, <em>i.e.</em> physically covering reactive surface sites, and chemical passivation, <em>i.e.</em> chemically consuming surface reactive sites. Experimentally, it is found that HAc and Hthd outperform the previously studied Hacac, as revealed by longer nucleation delays on Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> from in-situ spectroscopic ellipsometry, and by enhanced Si precursor blocking inferred from in-situ infrared spectroscopy. Through density functional theory and random sequential adsorption simulations, we illustrate that varying the size of SMIs brings benefits from either higher steric shielding or better chemical passivation. As compared to Hacac, HAc performs better due to its smaller size, yielding denser packing and thus higher chemical passivation. Hthd on the other hand, benefits from its bulkiness with a higher contribution from steric shielding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":247,"journal":{"name":"Applied Surface Science","volume":"665 ","pages":"Article 160141"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169433224008547/pdfft?md5=2e37264a12b67f2a1bd815eb721730a6&pid=1-s2.0-S0169433224008547-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Surface Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169433224008547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) hold great promise for area-selective deposition due to their vapor-phase application being compatible with industrial processing. However, to date only a handful of SMIs have been studied, and the mechanisms of precursor blocking require further understanding. In this study, we explore the inhibition of SiO2 ALD on Al2O3 surfaces comparing three SMIs of different sizes: acetic acid (HAc), acetylacetone (Hacac), and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedione (Hthd). The goal is to unravel the contributions of two important factors to their blocking performance: steric shielding, i.e. physically covering reactive surface sites, and chemical passivation, i.e. chemically consuming surface reactive sites. Experimentally, it is found that HAc and Hthd outperform the previously studied Hacac, as revealed by longer nucleation delays on Al2O3 from in-situ spectroscopic ellipsometry, and by enhanced Si precursor blocking inferred from in-situ infrared spectroscopy. Through density functional theory and random sequential adsorption simulations, we illustrate that varying the size of SMIs brings benefits from either higher steric shielding or better chemical passivation. As compared to Hacac, HAc performs better due to its smaller size, yielding denser packing and thus higher chemical passivation. Hthd on the other hand, benefits from its bulkiness with a higher contribution from steric shielding.

Abstract Image

不同大小的小分子抑制剂对区域选择性 ALD 的阻断机制:立体屏蔽与化学钝化
小分子抑制剂(SMI)因其气相应用与工业加工相兼容,在区域选择性沉积方面大有可为。然而,迄今为止只有少数几种 SMIs 得到了研究,前驱体阻断的机制也需要进一步了解。在本研究中,我们比较了三种不同大小的 SMI:乙酸 (HAc)、乙酰丙酮 (Hacac) 和 2,2,6,6-四甲基-3,5-庚二酮 (Hthd),探讨了它们对 Al2O3 表面 SiO2 ALD 的抑制作用。目的是揭示两个重要因素对其阻塞性能的贡献:立体屏蔽(即物理覆盖表面活性位点)和化学钝化(即化学消耗表面活性位点)。实验发现,HAc 和 Hthd 的性能优于之前研究的 Hacac,这体现在原位光谱椭偏仪显示的 Al2O3 上更长的成核延迟,以及原位红外光谱推断的更强的硅前驱体阻断能力。通过密度泛函理论和随机顺序吸附模拟,我们说明了改变 SMI 的大小可带来更高的立体屏蔽或更好的化学钝化效果。与 Hacac 相比,HAc 的性能更好,因为它的尺寸更小,能产生更密集的堆积,从而提高化学钝化效果。另一方面,Hthd 因其体积大而具有更高的立体屏蔽作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Surface Science
Applied Surface Science 工程技术-材料科学:膜
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
3393
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Applied Surface Science covers topics contributing to a better understanding of surfaces, interfaces, nanostructures and their applications. The journal is concerned with scientific research on the atomic and molecular level of material properties determined with specific surface analytical techniques and/or computational methods, as well as the processing of such structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信