Selective Use of CT Fractional Flow at a Large Academic Medical Center: Insights from Clinical Implementation after 1 Year of Practice.

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mangun K Randhawa, A. Takigami, V. Thondapu, P. Ranganath, Eric Zhang, A. Parakh, Reece J. Goiffon, V. Baliyan, B. Foldyna, Michael T Lu, A. Tower-Rader, N. Meyersohn, Sandeep Hedgire, B. Ghoshhajra
{"title":"Selective Use of CT Fractional Flow at a Large Academic Medical Center: Insights from Clinical Implementation after 1 Year of Practice.","authors":"Mangun K Randhawa, A. Takigami, V. Thondapu, P. Ranganath, Eric Zhang, A. Parakh, Reece J. Goiffon, V. Baliyan, B. Foldyna, Michael T Lu, A. Tower-Rader, N. Meyersohn, Sandeep Hedgire, B. Ghoshhajra","doi":"10.1148/ryct.230073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This special report outlines a retrospective observational study of CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) analysis using dual-source coronary CT angiography (CTA) scans performed without heart rate control and its impact on clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods All patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary CTA between August 2020 and August 2021 were included in this retrospective observational study. Scans were performed in the late systolic to early diastolic period without heart rate control and analyzed at the interpreting physician's discretion. Demographics, coronary CTA features, and rates of invasive coronary angiography (ICA), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), myocardial infarction, and all-cause death at 3 months were assessed by chart review. Results During the study period, 3098 patients underwent coronary CTA, of whom 113 with coronary bypass grafting were excluded. Of the remaining 2985 patients, 292 (9.7%) were referred for CT-FFR analysis. Two studies (0.7%) were rejected from CT-FFR analysis, and six (2.1%) analyses did not evaluate the lesion of concern. A total of 160 patients (56.3%) had CT-FFR greater than 0.80. Among patients with significant stenosis at coronary CTA, patients who underwent CT-FFR analysis presented with lower rates of ICA (74.5% vs 25.5%, P = .04) and PCI (78.9% vs 21.1%, P = .05). Conclusion CT-FFR was implemented in patients not requiring heart rate control by using dual-source coronary CTA acquisition and showed the potential to decrease rates of ICA and PCI without compromising safety in patients with significant stenosis and an average heart rate of 65 beats per minute. Keywords: Angiography, CT, CT-Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, Cardiac, Heart, Arteriosclerosis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This special report outlines a retrospective observational study of CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) analysis using dual-source coronary CT angiography (CTA) scans performed without heart rate control and its impact on clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods All patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary CTA between August 2020 and August 2021 were included in this retrospective observational study. Scans were performed in the late systolic to early diastolic period without heart rate control and analyzed at the interpreting physician's discretion. Demographics, coronary CTA features, and rates of invasive coronary angiography (ICA), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), myocardial infarction, and all-cause death at 3 months were assessed by chart review. Results During the study period, 3098 patients underwent coronary CTA, of whom 113 with coronary bypass grafting were excluded. Of the remaining 2985 patients, 292 (9.7%) were referred for CT-FFR analysis. Two studies (0.7%) were rejected from CT-FFR analysis, and six (2.1%) analyses did not evaluate the lesion of concern. A total of 160 patients (56.3%) had CT-FFR greater than 0.80. Among patients with significant stenosis at coronary CTA, patients who underwent CT-FFR analysis presented with lower rates of ICA (74.5% vs 25.5%, P = .04) and PCI (78.9% vs 21.1%, P = .05). Conclusion CT-FFR was implemented in patients not requiring heart rate control by using dual-source coronary CTA acquisition and showed the potential to decrease rates of ICA and PCI without compromising safety in patients with significant stenosis and an average heart rate of 65 beats per minute. Keywords: Angiography, CT, CT-Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, Cardiac, Heart, Arteriosclerosis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
在一家大型学术医疗中心选择性使用 CT 分数流:临床实践一年后的启示。
目的 本特别报告概述了一项使用双源冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术(CTA)扫描进行的 CT 分数血流储备(CT-FFR)分析(无心率控制)及其对临床结果影响的回顾性观察研究。材料和方法 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 8 月期间接受有临床指征的冠状动脉 CTA 的所有患者都纳入了这项回顾性观察研究。扫描在收缩晚期至舒张早期进行,无心率控制,由判读医生酌情分析。通过病历审查评估人口统计学、冠状动脉 CTA 特征以及 3 个月后有创冠状动脉造影术 (ICA)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI)、心肌梗死和全因死亡的发生率。结果 在研究期间,3098 名患者接受了冠状动脉 CTA 检查,其中 113 名接受过冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者被排除在外。在剩余的 2985 例患者中,有 292 例(9.7%)转入 CT-FFR 分析。两项研究(0.7%)被拒绝进行 CT-FFR 分析,六项分析(2.1%)未对相关病变进行评估。共有 160 名患者(56.3%)的 CT-FFR 大于 0.80。在冠状动脉 CTA 有明显狭窄的患者中,接受 CT-FFR 分析的患者接受 ICA(74.5% vs 25.5%,P = .04)和 PCI(78.9% vs 21.1%,P = .05)的比例较低。结论 CT-FFR通过使用双源冠状动脉CTA采集技术在不需要心率控制的患者中实施,并显示出在不影响安全性的情况下降低明显狭窄且平均心率为65次/分的患者的ICA和PCI率的潜力。关键词血管造影 CT CT-血管造影 分数血流储备 心脏 心脏动脉硬化 这篇文章有补充材料。© RSNA, 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信