Quantitative classification of equipment protection level in concept of zone classification with downtime of protective measures

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Teruhito Otsuka , Satoru Mochida , Takashi Furuya
{"title":"Quantitative classification of equipment protection level in concept of zone classification with downtime of protective measures","authors":"Teruhito Otsuka ,&nbsp;Satoru Mochida ,&nbsp;Takashi Furuya","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Handling flammable materials has a risk that can create explosive atmosphere. Such locations are classified as hazardous area, depending on the frequency and volume of explosive atmospheres. General electrical equipment is prohibited in the hazardous area and explosion protected equipment is used. These are the spatial isolation of ignition sources within the fire triangle, but even time isolation can prevent explosion hazards as well. It is proposed a method to classify zones from the calculation of downtime of protective measures based on failure rates and repair times of protective measures related to ventilation in explosive gas atmospheres with the Functional Safety under the time isolation concept. On the other hand, according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) System for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for Use in Explosive Atmospheres, explosion protected equipment was also classified as an Equipment Protection Level, \"EPL\". The EPL should be selected according to the risk of the hazardous area. However, in IEC60079–14:2013, users can choose any EPL according to their risk assessment. In this paper, we clarify the quantitative risk difference of EPLs with expansion the idea of classifying hazardous area from the downtime of protective measures and introduce a means to quantitatively classify the EPL of equipment in an explosive gas atmosphere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024000809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Handling flammable materials has a risk that can create explosive atmosphere. Such locations are classified as hazardous area, depending on the frequency and volume of explosive atmospheres. General electrical equipment is prohibited in the hazardous area and explosion protected equipment is used. These are the spatial isolation of ignition sources within the fire triangle, but even time isolation can prevent explosion hazards as well. It is proposed a method to classify zones from the calculation of downtime of protective measures based on failure rates and repair times of protective measures related to ventilation in explosive gas atmospheres with the Functional Safety under the time isolation concept. On the other hand, according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) System for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for Use in Explosive Atmospheres, explosion protected equipment was also classified as an Equipment Protection Level, "EPL". The EPL should be selected according to the risk of the hazardous area. However, in IEC60079–14:2013, users can choose any EPL according to their risk assessment. In this paper, we clarify the quantitative risk difference of EPLs with expansion the idea of classifying hazardous area from the downtime of protective measures and introduce a means to quantitatively classify the EPL of equipment in an explosive gas atmosphere.

带保护措施停机时间的区域划分概念中的设备保护等级定量划分
处理易燃材料有可能产生爆炸性气体。根据爆炸性气体的频率和体积,此类场所被划分为危险区域。危险区域内禁止使用一般电气设备,而应使用防爆设备。这些都是在火灾三角区内对点火源的空间隔离,但即使是时间隔离也能防止爆炸危险。根据时间隔离概念下与爆炸性气体环境中通风功能安全相关的保护措施的故障率和维修时间,提出了一种从计算保护措施停机时间来划分区域的方法。另一方面,根据国际电工委员会(IEC)爆炸性气体环境使用设备相关标准认证体系,防爆设备也被划分为设备保护等级(EPL)。应根据危险区域的风险选择 EPL。但在 IEC60079-14:2013 中,用户可根据风险评估选择任何 EPL。本文通过扩展从保护措施的停机时间来划分危险区域的思路,阐明了 EPL 的定量风险差异,并介绍了一种定量划分爆炸性气体环境中设备 EPL 的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信