Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal </span>osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Maximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO.</p></div><div><h3>Study type</h3><p>Prospective Cadaver Study.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>V.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 516-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S126877312400078X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO.

Methods

The ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis.

Results

Maximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96.

Conclusion

Based on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO.

Study type

Prospective Cadaver Study.

Level of evidence

V.

Zadek 截骨术中的钙楔背侧切除:尸体研究
背景插入性跟腱病(IAT)是一种常见病症,有多种手术治疗方法可供选择。Zadek背侧闭合楔形小腿截骨术(ZO)已被证明是治疗IAT的有效方法。关于楔形切除的理想测量方法,文献中有各种建议,以产生最大的术后活动范围(ROM),从而实现术后生物力学潜力。因此,这项尸体研究的目的是评估通过 ZO 去除楔形物的各种测量方法后达到的活动范围。在每个标本上标记并依次完成 7.5 毫米和 15 毫米的楔形截骨。利用侧透视成像对每个截骨部位进行术前和术后 ROM 测量。对每种楔形大小的背屈(DF)和跖屈(PF)ROM弧度进行测量,并通过t检验进行比较。结果截骨前的最大 DF 为 110.87 ± 12.97 度。去除 7.5 mm 的楔块后,DF 平均为 102.93 ± 13.81 度,提高了 8 度(p = 0.08)。移除 15 毫米楔形块可将 DF 改善 16 度,达到平均 95.96 ± 11.41 度(p = 0.003)。Cohen's d 和效应大小计算显示,7.5 毫米楔形对 DF 的影响较小,而 15 毫米楔形的影响中等(分别为 0.29 和 0.52)。最大 PF 在截骨前、7.5 毫米楔块或 15 毫米楔块位置之间没有明显变化。结论根据本研究的结果,与 7.5 毫米楔形体相比,使用 ZO 移除 15 毫米楔形体可显著且更大程度地改善 ROM。我们希望本研究能为 ZO 的术前规划提供更好的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信