Investment performance comparison among various portfolio selection strategies in Taiwan stock market

IF 5.5 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Hung-Hsi Huang , Ting-Hao Chang , Ching-Ping Wang
{"title":"Investment performance comparison among various portfolio selection strategies in Taiwan stock market","authors":"Hung-Hsi Huang ,&nbsp;Ting-Hao Chang ,&nbsp;Ching-Ping Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This comparative analysis of the investment performance of eight portfolio strategies in the Taiwan stock market utilizes monthly data from Taiwan-listed companies from 1990 to 2021; the portfolio for each year comprises the top 100 companies based on market capitalization. Setting aside the equally and value-weighted portfolio strategies, the six strategies remaining are grounded in the mean-variance framework, fundamental index model, predictive blends model, and single-index model, respectively. Employing the rolling-window method, we compute the following monthly out-of-sample performance metrics for the portfolios: average excess return, standard deviation, Sharpe ratio, certainty equivalent return (CER), single-year cumulative returns, and value-at-risk. Portfolio weights are determined using a five-year estimation period and remain fixed (buy and hold) during the sixth year. In addition to scrutinizing the portfolios’ performance on a yearly basis, we also assess their cumulative long-term performance over multiple years. We investigate the impact of stock market fluctuations on various investment strategies, considering periods of boom and bust as a test of robustness. We posit here that CER, rather than the Sharpe ratio, is a suitable performance measurement index. We further explore the influence of portfolio diversification on investment performance. Generally, our findings suggest an inverse relationship between investment performance and the HHI, indicating that diversification tends to enhance investment performance while mitigating investment risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46001,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Management Review","volume":"29 2","pages":"Pages 195-214"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313224000022/pdfft?md5=eaa8946c55c7e7baeb628912c35e71cb&pid=1-s2.0-S1029313224000022-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313224000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comparative analysis of the investment performance of eight portfolio strategies in the Taiwan stock market utilizes monthly data from Taiwan-listed companies from 1990 to 2021; the portfolio for each year comprises the top 100 companies based on market capitalization. Setting aside the equally and value-weighted portfolio strategies, the six strategies remaining are grounded in the mean-variance framework, fundamental index model, predictive blends model, and single-index model, respectively. Employing the rolling-window method, we compute the following monthly out-of-sample performance metrics for the portfolios: average excess return, standard deviation, Sharpe ratio, certainty equivalent return (CER), single-year cumulative returns, and value-at-risk. Portfolio weights are determined using a five-year estimation period and remain fixed (buy and hold) during the sixth year. In addition to scrutinizing the portfolios’ performance on a yearly basis, we also assess their cumulative long-term performance over multiple years. We investigate the impact of stock market fluctuations on various investment strategies, considering periods of boom and bust as a test of robustness. We posit here that CER, rather than the Sharpe ratio, is a suitable performance measurement index. We further explore the influence of portfolio diversification on investment performance. Generally, our findings suggest an inverse relationship between investment performance and the HHI, indicating that diversification tends to enhance investment performance while mitigating investment risk.

台湾股市各种投资组合选择策略的投资绩效比较
本研究利用1990年至2021年台湾上市公司的月度数据,对八种投资组合策略在台湾股市的投资表现进行了比较分析。除去均值加权和价值加权组合策略,其余六种策略分别基于均值-方差框架、基本指数模型、预测混合模型和单一指数模型。采用滚动窗口法,我们计算了投资组合的以下月度样本外绩效指标:平均超额收益、标准差、夏普比率、确定性等价收益(CER)、单年累计收益和风险价值。投资组合权重以五年为估算期,并在第六年保持固定(买入并持有)。除了仔细研究投资组合的年度表现外,我们还对其多年的累积长期表现进行了评估。我们研究了股市波动对各种投资策略的影响,并将繁荣期和萧条期视为稳健性测试。我们在此认为,CER 而不是夏普比率是一个合适的业绩衡量指标。我们进一步探讨了投资组合多样化对投资业绩的影响。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,投资业绩与 HHI 之间呈反比关系,这表明分散投资往往能提高投资业绩,同时降低投资风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Management Review (APMR), peer-reviewed and published quarterly, pursues to publish original and high quality research articles and notes that contribute to build empirical and theoretical understanding for concerning strategy and management aspects in business and activities. Meanwhile, we also seek to publish short communications and opinions addressing issues of current concern to managers in regards to within and between the Asia-Pacific region. The covered domains but not limited to, such as accounting, finance, marketing, decision analysis and operation management, human resource management, information management, international business management, logistic and supply chain management, quantitative and research methods, strategic and business management, and tourism management, are suitable for publication in the APMR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信