Owner perceptions and experiences with equine necropsy

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Z.E. Inglis , A.M. Firshman , H.L. Lochner , K.L. Martinson
{"title":"Owner perceptions and experiences with equine necropsy","authors":"Z.E. Inglis ,&nbsp;A.M. Firshman ,&nbsp;H.L. Lochner ,&nbsp;K.L. Martinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the number of horses submitted for necropsy has been in decline. This study aimed to identify the perceptions and barriers of equine necropsy through an online survey of horse owners. The data were analyzed by multivariate models for associations and factors that influenced decision making regarding necropsy. The survey yielded 1,366 usable responses. Respondents had higher familiarity with the term “autopsy” compared to “necropsy” (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and showed a greater level of comfort using the terms “body” and “mortality” compared to “carcass” (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Most respondents (82 %) had experienced euthanizing a horse, but few (27 %) were offered a necropsy. Of those offered a necropsy, a majority (81 %) opted to perform one. When asked about their reasons for choosing to have a necropsy performed, recommendations from veterinarians (77.87 OR, 95 % CI: 49.3, 127.5) and already knowing the cause of death (1.85 OR, 95 % CI: 1.2, 30) were positively associated while a benefit to herd health was negatively associated (0.55 OR, 95 % CI: 0.3, 1.0). Owning horses for use as competition animals (1.44 OR, 95 % CI: 0.9, 2.2), the desire for personal closure (1.76 OR, 95 % CI: 1.1, 2.9), and the goals to protect human health (1.29 OR, 95 % CI: 1.0, 1.6) and to improve herd health (1.43 OR, 95 % CI: 1.1, 1.9) were positively associated with a likelihood of choosing to have a necropsy performed or recommending necropsies in the future. This research highlights the need for education of horse owners about the option and benefits of necropsy, and the use of more societally accepted language.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080624000728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the number of horses submitted for necropsy has been in decline. This study aimed to identify the perceptions and barriers of equine necropsy through an online survey of horse owners. The data were analyzed by multivariate models for associations and factors that influenced decision making regarding necropsy. The survey yielded 1,366 usable responses. Respondents had higher familiarity with the term “autopsy” compared to “necropsy” (P < 0.001) and showed a greater level of comfort using the terms “body” and “mortality” compared to “carcass” (P < 0.001). Most respondents (82 %) had experienced euthanizing a horse, but few (27 %) were offered a necropsy. Of those offered a necropsy, a majority (81 %) opted to perform one. When asked about their reasons for choosing to have a necropsy performed, recommendations from veterinarians (77.87 OR, 95 % CI: 49.3, 127.5) and already knowing the cause of death (1.85 OR, 95 % CI: 1.2, 30) were positively associated while a benefit to herd health was negatively associated (0.55 OR, 95 % CI: 0.3, 1.0). Owning horses for use as competition animals (1.44 OR, 95 % CI: 0.9, 2.2), the desire for personal closure (1.76 OR, 95 % CI: 1.1, 2.9), and the goals to protect human health (1.29 OR, 95 % CI: 1.0, 1.6) and to improve herd health (1.43 OR, 95 % CI: 1.1, 1.9) were positively associated with a likelihood of choosing to have a necropsy performed or recommending necropsies in the future. This research highlights the need for education of horse owners about the option and benefits of necropsy, and the use of more societally accepted language.

马主对马匹尸体解剖的看法和经验。
近年来,提交尸检的马匹数量一直在下降。本研究旨在通过对马主进行在线调查,确定他们对马匹尸体解剖的看法和障碍。通过多变量模型对数据进行分析,找出影响尸检决策的关联和因素。调查共收到 1366 份可用回复。与 "尸体解剖 "相比,受访者对 "尸体解剖 "一词的熟悉程度更高(P <0.001),与 "尸体 "相比,受访者对 "尸体 "和 "死亡 "这两个词的使用更得心应手(P <0.001)。大多数受访者(82%)都有过对马实施安乐术的经历,但很少有人(27%)会对马进行尸体解剖。在接受过尸体解剖的受访者中,大多数(81%)选择了进行尸体解剖。当被问及选择进行尸体解剖的原因时,兽医的建议(77.87 OR,95 % CI:49.3, 127.5)和已经知道死因(1.85 OR,95 % CI:1.2, 30)与尸体解剖呈正相关,而对马群健康的益处与尸体解剖呈负相关(0.55 OR,95 % CI:0.3, 1.0)。拥有马匹作为比赛用马(1.44 OR,95 % CI:0.9,2.2)、个人封闭的愿望(1.76 OR,95 % CI:1.1,2.9)、保护人类健康的目标(1.29 OR,95 % CI:1.0,1.6)和改善马群健康的目标(1.43 OR,95 % CI:1.1,1.9)与将来选择进行尸体解剖或建议进行尸体解剖的可能性呈正相关。这项研究强调,有必要对马主进行有关尸体解剖的选择和益处的教育,并使用更多社会认可的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信