Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Acceptance-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Skin-Picking Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mia Asplund, Fabian Lenhard, Christian Rück, Erik Andersson, Tova Grimlund, Maja Nilsson, Mika Sarachu-Nilsson, Linda Sundh, Volen Z. Ivanov
{"title":"Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Acceptance-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Skin-Picking Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Mia Asplund,&nbsp;Fabian Lenhard,&nbsp;Christian Rück,&nbsp;Erik Andersson,&nbsp;Tova Grimlund,&nbsp;Maja Nilsson,&nbsp;Mika Sarachu-Nilsson,&nbsp;Linda Sundh,&nbsp;Volen Z. Ivanov","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its high prevalence, individuals suffering from skin-picking disorder (SPD) face limited access to treatment due to several factors, including geographical and economic barriers, as well as a shortage of properly trained therapists. Offering Internet-delivered therapy could be a solution to these barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of therapist-guided Internet-delivered acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy (iBT) for SPD compared to a wait-list control condition. Participants randomized to the intervention group received 10 weeks of iBT (<em>n</em> = 35), while those in the control group were placed on a wait-list (<em>n</em> = 35). The primary outcome was the Skin Picking Scale—Revised (SPS-R). Mixed-model regression analyses demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in SPD symptoms in the iBT group compared to the control group at posttreatment (between-group difference −5.1 points, <em>F</em> = 9.69, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). The between-group effect size was in the large range, with a bootstrapped <em>d</em> of 1.3 (95% CI [0.92, 1.69]). At posttreatment, 43% of the participants in the iBT group were classified as responders, and 31% were in remission, compared to 0% responders and 3% in remission in the control group. At the 6-month follow-up, the SPD symptoms had increased compared to posttreatment. However, the improvement from pretreatment remained significant. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction and credibility of the treatment, and a perceived good level of working alliance. Compared to wait-list control, iBT is an efficacious treatment for SPD at posttreatment and follow-up, with the potential to substantially increase the availability and access to evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Replication studies, particularly those comparing iBT to an active control, are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 1","pages":"Pages 70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its high prevalence, individuals suffering from skin-picking disorder (SPD) face limited access to treatment due to several factors, including geographical and economic barriers, as well as a shortage of properly trained therapists. Offering Internet-delivered therapy could be a solution to these barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of therapist-guided Internet-delivered acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy (iBT) for SPD compared to a wait-list control condition. Participants randomized to the intervention group received 10 weeks of iBT (n = 35), while those in the control group were placed on a wait-list (n = 35). The primary outcome was the Skin Picking Scale—Revised (SPS-R). Mixed-model regression analyses demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in SPD symptoms in the iBT group compared to the control group at posttreatment (between-group difference −5.1 points, F = 9.69, p < .001). The between-group effect size was in the large range, with a bootstrapped d of 1.3 (95% CI [0.92, 1.69]). At posttreatment, 43% of the participants in the iBT group were classified as responders, and 31% were in remission, compared to 0% responders and 3% in remission in the control group. At the 6-month follow-up, the SPD symptoms had increased compared to posttreatment. However, the improvement from pretreatment remained significant. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction and credibility of the treatment, and a perceived good level of working alliance. Compared to wait-list control, iBT is an efficacious treatment for SPD at posttreatment and follow-up, with the potential to substantially increase the availability and access to evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Replication studies, particularly those comparing iBT to an active control, are warranted.
治疗师指导下的网络接受强化行为疗法治疗抠皮症:随机对照试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信