Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Acceptance-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Skin-Picking Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mia Asplund, Fabian Lenhard, Christian Rück, Erik Andersson, Tova Grimlund, Maja Nilsson, Mika Sarachu-Nilsson, Linda Sundh, Volen Z. Ivanov
{"title":"Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Acceptance-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Skin-Picking Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Mia Asplund,&nbsp;Fabian Lenhard,&nbsp;Christian Rück,&nbsp;Erik Andersson,&nbsp;Tova Grimlund,&nbsp;Maja Nilsson,&nbsp;Mika Sarachu-Nilsson,&nbsp;Linda Sundh,&nbsp;Volen Z. Ivanov","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its high prevalence, individuals suffering from skin-picking disorder (SPD) face limited access to treatment due to several factors, including geographical and economic barriers, as well as a shortage of properly trained therapists. Offering Internet-delivered therapy could be a solution to these barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of therapist-guided Internet-delivered acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy (iBT) for SPD compared to a wait-list control condition. Participants randomized to the intervention group received 10 weeks of iBT (<em>n</em> = 35), while those in the control group were placed on a wait-list (<em>n</em> = 35). The primary outcome was the Skin Picking Scale—Revised (SPS-R). Mixed-model regression analyses demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in SPD symptoms in the iBT group compared to the control group at posttreatment (between-group difference −5.1 points, <em>F</em> = 9.69, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). The between-group effect size was in the large range, with a bootstrapped <em>d</em> of 1.3 (95% CI [0.92, 1.69]). At posttreatment, 43% of the participants in the iBT group were classified as responders, and 31% were in remission, compared to 0% responders and 3% in remission in the control group. At the 6-month follow-up, the SPD symptoms had increased compared to posttreatment. However, the improvement from pretreatment remained significant. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction and credibility of the treatment, and a perceived good level of working alliance. Compared to wait-list control, iBT is an efficacious treatment for SPD at posttreatment and follow-up, with the potential to substantially increase the availability and access to evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Replication studies, particularly those comparing iBT to an active control, are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 1","pages":"Pages 70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its high prevalence, individuals suffering from skin-picking disorder (SPD) face limited access to treatment due to several factors, including geographical and economic barriers, as well as a shortage of properly trained therapists. Offering Internet-delivered therapy could be a solution to these barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of therapist-guided Internet-delivered acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy (iBT) for SPD compared to a wait-list control condition. Participants randomized to the intervention group received 10 weeks of iBT (n = 35), while those in the control group were placed on a wait-list (n = 35). The primary outcome was the Skin Picking Scale—Revised (SPS-R). Mixed-model regression analyses demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in SPD symptoms in the iBT group compared to the control group at posttreatment (between-group difference −5.1 points, F = 9.69, p < .001). The between-group effect size was in the large range, with a bootstrapped d of 1.3 (95% CI [0.92, 1.69]). At posttreatment, 43% of the participants in the iBT group were classified as responders, and 31% were in remission, compared to 0% responders and 3% in remission in the control group. At the 6-month follow-up, the SPD symptoms had increased compared to posttreatment. However, the improvement from pretreatment remained significant. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction and credibility of the treatment, and a perceived good level of working alliance. Compared to wait-list control, iBT is an efficacious treatment for SPD at posttreatment and follow-up, with the potential to substantially increase the availability and access to evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Replication studies, particularly those comparing iBT to an active control, are warranted.
治疗师指导下的网络接受强化行为疗法治疗抠皮症:随机对照试验
尽管其发病率很高,但由于地理和经济障碍以及缺乏受过适当训练的治疗师等几个因素,患有抠皮障碍(SPD)的个体获得治疗的机会有限。提供互联网治疗可能是解决这些障碍的一种方法。本研究旨在评估治疗师指导的网络接受增强行为疗法(iBT)对SPD的疗效,并与等候名单对照条件进行比较。随机分配到干预组的参与者接受10周的iBT治疗(n = 35),而对照组的参与者则被放置在等待名单上(n = 35)。主要结果是皮肤采摘量表-修订(SPS-R)。混合模型回归分析显示,与对照组相比,iBT组治疗后SPD症状的改善明显更大(组间差异- 5.1分,F = 9.69,p <; .001)。组间效应量在较大范围内,自举d为1.3 (95% CI[0.92, 1.69])。在治疗后,iBT组中43%的参与者被归类为应答者,31%的参与者处于缓解期,而对照组中应答者为0%,缓解期为3%。在6个月的随访中,SPD症状与治疗后相比有所增加。然而,预处理后的改善仍然显著。参与者报告了高水平的满意度和治疗的可信度,并感知到良好的工作联盟水平。与等候名单对照相比,iBT在治疗后和随访中是一种有效的SPD治疗方法,有可能大大增加这种疾病的循证治疗的可用性和可及性。重复研究,特别是将iBT与主动对照进行比较的研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信