Methodology for Using Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records to Assess Chemotherapy Administration in Women With Breast Cancer.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jenna Bhimani, K. O'Connell, I. Ergas, Marilyn J. Foley, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Sonia Persaud, Donna R Rivera, Janise M. Roh, Sara M. Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Erin J A Bowles, Elisa V Bandera, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor
{"title":"Methodology for Using Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records to Assess Chemotherapy Administration in Women With Breast Cancer.","authors":"Jenna Bhimani, K. O'Connell, I. Ergas, Marilyn J. Foley, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Sonia Persaud, Donna R Rivera, Janise M. Roh, Sara M. Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Erin J A Bowles, Elisa V Bandera, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor","doi":"10.1200/CCI.23.00209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nIdentification of patients' intended chemotherapy regimens is critical to most research questions conducted in the real-world setting of cancer care. Yet, these data are not routinely available in electronic health records (EHRs) at the specificity required to address these questions. We developed a methodology to identify patients' intended regimens from EHR data in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn women older than 18 years, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019), we categorized participants into 24 drug combinations described in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for breast cancer treatment. Participants were categorized into 50 guideline chemotherapy administration schedules within these combinations using an iterative algorithm process, followed by chart abstraction where necessary. We also identified patients intended to receive nonguideline administration schedules within guideline drug combinations and nonguideline drug combinations. This process was adapted at Kaiser Permanente Washington using abstracted data (2004-2015).\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the OBCD cohort, 13,231 women received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 10,213 (77%) had their intended regimen identified via the algorithm, 2,416 (18%) had their intended regimen identified via abstraction, and 602 (4.5%) could not be identified. Across guideline drug combinations, 111 nonguideline dosing schedules were used, alongside 61 nonguideline drug combinations. A number of factors were associated with requiring abstraction for regimen determination, including: decreasing neighborhood household income, earlier diagnosis year, later stage, nodal status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ status.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWe describe the challenges and approaches to operationalize complex, real-world data to identify intended chemotherapy regimens in large, observational studies. This methodology can improve efficiency of use of large-scale clinical data in real-world populations, helping answer critical questions to improve care delivery and patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Identification of patients' intended chemotherapy regimens is critical to most research questions conducted in the real-world setting of cancer care. Yet, these data are not routinely available in electronic health records (EHRs) at the specificity required to address these questions. We developed a methodology to identify patients' intended regimens from EHR data in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study. METHODS In women older than 18 years, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019), we categorized participants into 24 drug combinations described in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for breast cancer treatment. Participants were categorized into 50 guideline chemotherapy administration schedules within these combinations using an iterative algorithm process, followed by chart abstraction where necessary. We also identified patients intended to receive nonguideline administration schedules within guideline drug combinations and nonguideline drug combinations. This process was adapted at Kaiser Permanente Washington using abstracted data (2004-2015). RESULTS In the OBCD cohort, 13,231 women received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 10,213 (77%) had their intended regimen identified via the algorithm, 2,416 (18%) had their intended regimen identified via abstraction, and 602 (4.5%) could not be identified. Across guideline drug combinations, 111 nonguideline dosing schedules were used, alongside 61 nonguideline drug combinations. A number of factors were associated with requiring abstraction for regimen determination, including: decreasing neighborhood household income, earlier diagnosis year, later stage, nodal status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ status. CONCLUSION We describe the challenges and approaches to operationalize complex, real-world data to identify intended chemotherapy regimens in large, observational studies. This methodology can improve efficiency of use of large-scale clinical data in real-world populations, helping answer critical questions to improve care delivery and patient outcomes.
使用电子健康记录真实数据评估乳腺癌妇女化疗管理的方法。
目的确定患者的预期化疗方案对于在癌症治疗的现实环境中开展的大多数研究问题至关重要。然而,电子健康记录(EHR)中的这些数据并不具备解决这些问题所需的常规特异性。我们开发了一种方法,从最佳乳腺癌化疗剂量(OBCD)研究中的电子病历数据中确定患者的预期治疗方案。方法在北加州凯撒医疗中心(Kaiser Permanente Northern California,2006-2019 年)被诊断为原发性 I-IIIA 期乳腺癌的 18 岁以上女性中,我们将参与者分为国家综合癌症网络乳腺癌治疗指南中描述的 24 种药物组合。在这些药物组合中,我们采用迭代算法将参与者分为 50 个指南化疗给药计划,必要时还进行了病历摘录。我们还在指南药物组合和非指南药物组合中确定了打算接受非指南给药方案的患者。结果 在 OBCD 队列中,13231 名女性接受了辅助化疗或新辅助化疗,其中 10213 人(77%)通过算法确定了预定方案,2416 人(18%)通过病历摘要确定了预定方案,602 人(4.5%)无法确定。在指南药物组合中,使用了 111 种非指南剂量表,以及 61 种非指南药物组合。一些因素与需要抽取数据以确定治疗方案有关,其中包括:社区家庭收入减少、诊断年份较早、分期较晚、结节状态和人类表皮生长因子受体 2 (HER2)+ 状态。这种方法可以提高真实世界人群中大规模临床数据的使用效率,帮助回答关键问题,改善医疗服务和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信