Continued improvement in the development of the SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing proficiency testing program

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Katherine A. Lau , Charles S.P. Foster , Torsten Theis , Jenny Draper , Mitchell J. Sullivan , Susan Ballard , William D. Rawlinson
{"title":"Continued improvement in the development of the SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing proficiency testing program","authors":"Katherine A. Lau ,&nbsp;Charles S.P. Foster ,&nbsp;Torsten Theis ,&nbsp;Jenny Draper ,&nbsp;Mitchell J. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Susan Ballard ,&nbsp;William D. Rawlinson","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Application of whole genome sequencing (WGS) has allowed monitoring of the emergence of variants of concern (VOC) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) globally. Genomic investigation of emerging variants and surveillance of clinical progress has reduced the public health impact of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. These steps required developing and implementing a proficiency testing program (PTP), as WGS has been incorporated into routine reference laboratory practice. In this study, we describe how the PTP evaluated the capacity and capability of one New Zealand and 14 Australian public health laboratories to perform WGS of SARS-CoV-2 in 2022. The participants' performances in characterising a specimen panel of known SARS-CoV-2 isolates in the PTP were assessed based on: (1) genome coverage, (2) Pango lineage, and (3) sequence quality, with the choice of assessment metrics refined based on a previously reported assessment conducted in 2021. The participants' performances in 2021 and 2022 were also compared after reassessing the 2021 results using the more stringent metrics adopted in 2022. We found that more participants would have failed the 2021 assessment for all survey samples and a significantly higher fail rate per sample in 2021 compared to 2022. This study highlights the importance of choosing appropriate performance metrics to reflect better the laboratories' capacity to perform SARS-CoV-2 WGS, as was done in the 2022 PTP. It also displays the need for a PTP for WGS of SARS-CoV-2 to be available to public health laboratories ongoing, with continuous refinements in the design and provision of the PTP to account for the dynamic nature of the COVID-19 pandemic as SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":"56 5","pages":"Pages 717-725"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524001028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Application of whole genome sequencing (WGS) has allowed monitoring of the emergence of variants of concern (VOC) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) globally. Genomic investigation of emerging variants and surveillance of clinical progress has reduced the public health impact of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. These steps required developing and implementing a proficiency testing program (PTP), as WGS has been incorporated into routine reference laboratory practice. In this study, we describe how the PTP evaluated the capacity and capability of one New Zealand and 14 Australian public health laboratories to perform WGS of SARS-CoV-2 in 2022. The participants' performances in characterising a specimen panel of known SARS-CoV-2 isolates in the PTP were assessed based on: (1) genome coverage, (2) Pango lineage, and (3) sequence quality, with the choice of assessment metrics refined based on a previously reported assessment conducted in 2021. The participants' performances in 2021 and 2022 were also compared after reassessing the 2021 results using the more stringent metrics adopted in 2022. We found that more participants would have failed the 2021 assessment for all survey samples and a significantly higher fail rate per sample in 2021 compared to 2022. This study highlights the importance of choosing appropriate performance metrics to reflect better the laboratories' capacity to perform SARS-CoV-2 WGS, as was done in the 2022 PTP. It also displays the need for a PTP for WGS of SARS-CoV-2 to be available to public health laboratories ongoing, with continuous refinements in the design and provision of the PTP to account for the dynamic nature of the COVID-19 pandemic as SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve.

继续改进 SARS-CoV-2 全基因组测序能力测试项目的开发工作
全基因组测序技术(WGS)的应用使我们能够在全球范围内监测严重急性呼吸系统综合征相关冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的变异体(VOC)的出现。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对新出现变种的基因组调查和对临床进展的监测减少了感染对公共卫生的影响。由于 WGS 已被纳入常规参考实验室实践,这些步骤需要制定和实施能力验证计划 (PTP)。在本研究中,我们介绍了能力验证计划如何评估新西兰和澳大利亚的一家公共卫生实验室以及澳大利亚的 14 家公共卫生实验室在 2022 年对 SARS-CoV-2 进行 WGS 检测的能力。参与 PTP 的实验室在对已知 SARS-CoV-2 分离物标本进行特征描述方面的表现根据以下几个方面进行评估:(1) 基因组覆盖率,(2) Pango 系谱,(3) 序列质量,评估指标的选择根据之前报告的 2021 年进行的评估进行了改进。在使用 2022 年采用的更严格指标重新评估 2021 年的结果后,我们还对参与者在 2021 年和 2022 年的表现进行了比较。我们发现,在 2021 年的所有调查样本中,有更多的参与者未能通过 2021 年的评估,而且 2021 年每个样本的不及格率明显高于 2022 年。这项研究强调了选择适当绩效指标的重要性,以更好地反映实验室执行 SARS-CoV-2 WGS 的能力,2022 年 PTP 就是这样做的。它还表明,公共卫生实验室需要持续提供 SARS-CoV-2 WGS 的 PTP,并不断改进 PTP 的设计和提供,以考虑到 COVID-19 大流行的动态性质,因为 SARS-CoV-2 在不断演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信