Improved Wave Equation Analysis for Piles in Soil-Based Intermediate Geomaterials with LRFD Recommendations and Economic Impact Assessment

Harish K. Kalauni, N. B. Masud, Kam Ng, S. Wulff
{"title":"Improved Wave Equation Analysis for Piles in Soil-Based Intermediate Geomaterials with LRFD Recommendations and Economic Impact Assessment","authors":"Harish K. Kalauni, N. B. Masud, Kam Ng, S. Wulff","doi":"10.3390/geotechnics4020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving (WEAP) has been widely used to determine drivability, predict static resistance, and assure the integrity of piles in soils. Assigning static and dynamic properties of Soil-based Intermediate Geomaterials (S-IGMs) remains a challenge in WEAP, partly attributed to IGMs that act as transition geomaterials between soil and hard rock. Furthermore, reliable static analysis methods for unit resistance predictions are rarely available for driven piles in S-IGMs in the default WEAP method. To alleviate these challenges, this study presents improved WEAP methods for steel piles driven in S-IGMs, including proposed damping parameters and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) recommendations based on newly developed static analysis methods and the classification of S-IGMs. A back calculation approach is used to generate the appropriate damping parameters for S-IGMs for three distinct subsurface conditions utilizing a database of 34 steel H- and pipe piles. Newly developed WEAP and LRFD procedures are also recommended. Additional independent 22 test pile data are used to compare and evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed WEAP methods with the default WEAP method. Compared with the default WEAP, bearing graph analysis results revealed that the selected proposed WEAP method, on average, reduces the underprediction of pile resistances by 6% and improves the reliability with a 43% reduction in the coefficient of variation (COV). Calibrated resistance factors for the proposed WEAP method increase to as high as 0.75 compared to the current AASHTO recommendation of 0.50. An economic impact assessment reveals that the proposed WEAP method is more efficient than the default WEAP method as the average difference in steel weight for 32 test piles is 0.06 kg/kN, almost close to zero, reducing the construction challenges in the current engineering practice.","PeriodicalId":505610,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnics","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics4020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving (WEAP) has been widely used to determine drivability, predict static resistance, and assure the integrity of piles in soils. Assigning static and dynamic properties of Soil-based Intermediate Geomaterials (S-IGMs) remains a challenge in WEAP, partly attributed to IGMs that act as transition geomaterials between soil and hard rock. Furthermore, reliable static analysis methods for unit resistance predictions are rarely available for driven piles in S-IGMs in the default WEAP method. To alleviate these challenges, this study presents improved WEAP methods for steel piles driven in S-IGMs, including proposed damping parameters and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) recommendations based on newly developed static analysis methods and the classification of S-IGMs. A back calculation approach is used to generate the appropriate damping parameters for S-IGMs for three distinct subsurface conditions utilizing a database of 34 steel H- and pipe piles. Newly developed WEAP and LRFD procedures are also recommended. Additional independent 22 test pile data are used to compare and evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed WEAP methods with the default WEAP method. Compared with the default WEAP, bearing graph analysis results revealed that the selected proposed WEAP method, on average, reduces the underprediction of pile resistances by 6% and improves the reliability with a 43% reduction in the coefficient of variation (COV). Calibrated resistance factors for the proposed WEAP method increase to as high as 0.75 compared to the current AASHTO recommendation of 0.50. An economic impact assessment reveals that the proposed WEAP method is more efficient than the default WEAP method as the average difference in steel weight for 32 test piles is 0.06 kg/kN, almost close to zero, reducing the construction challenges in the current engineering practice.
基于 LRFD 建议和经济影响评估的土基中间土工材料中桩的改进波浪方程分析
打桩波浪方程分析法(WEAP)已被广泛用于确定可打性、预测静态阻力和确保桩在土壤中的完整性。分配土基中间土工材料(S-IGMs)的静态和动态特性仍是 WEAP 的一项挑战,部分原因在于 IGMs 是介于土壤和硬岩之间的过渡性土工材料。此外,在默认的 WEAP 方法中,很少有可靠的静态分析方法来预测 S-IGM 中的打入桩的单位阻力。为了缓解这些挑战,本研究提出了适用于在 S-IGM 中打入钢桩的改进 WEAP 方法,包括根据新开发的静力分析方法和 S-IGM 的分类提出的阻尼参数和荷载与阻力系数设计 (LRFD) 建议。利用 34 个钢 H 型桩和钢管桩数据库,采用反向计算方法为 S-IGMs 生成三种不同地下条件下的适当阻尼参数。同时还推荐了新开发的 WEAP 和 LRFD 程序。另外还使用了 22 个独立的试桩数据来比较和评估所建议的 WEAP 方法与默认 WEAP 方法的准确性和效率。与默认的 WEAP 相比,承载力图表分析结果显示,所选的建议 WEAP 方法平均可将桩抗力预测不足率降低 6%,并提高了可靠性,将变异系数 (COV) 降低了 43%。与 AASHTO 目前建议的 0.50 相比,建议的 WEAP 方法的校准阻力系数可提高到 0.75。经济影响评估显示,建议的 WEAP 方法比默认的 WEAP 方法更有效,因为 32 个测试桩的平均钢重差异为 0.06 千克/千牛,几乎接近于零,减少了当前工程实践中的施工挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信