Are Middle- or Older-Aged Adults With a Spinal Cord Injury Engaging in Leisure-Time Physical Activity? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Laura Stendell MPhysio , Peter W. Stubbs PhD , Esminio Rivera M Res Physio , Kris Rogers PhD , Arianne P. Verhagen PhD , Glen M. Davis PhD , James W. Middleton PhD , Camila Quel de Oliveira PhD
{"title":"Are Middle- or Older-Aged Adults With a Spinal Cord Injury Engaging in Leisure-Time Physical Activity? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Laura Stendell MPhysio ,&nbsp;Peter W. Stubbs PhD ,&nbsp;Esminio Rivera M Res Physio ,&nbsp;Kris Rogers PhD ,&nbsp;Arianne P. Verhagen PhD ,&nbsp;Glen M. Davis PhD ,&nbsp;James W. Middleton PhD ,&nbsp;Camila Quel de Oliveira PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the amount of Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA) that people over 45 years with a spinal cord injury (SCI) performed and to determine the frequency, duration, intensity, and modality of LTPA performed.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p>We searched 5 major electronic databases (CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed) from inception to March 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><p>Cross-sectional, longitudinal studies and control arm of controlled trials that assessed LTPA in participants over 45 years old, with a SCI. We included 19 studies in the review and 11 in the meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><p>We followed the PRISMA checklist for Systematic Reviews. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data on participants’ demographics, injury characteristics, and LTPA participation of the included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanne Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Any conflicts were resolved by a third author.</p></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><p>We found considerable variability in LTPA participation in adults 45 years and older with SCI. An estimated 27%-64% of participants did not take part in any LTPA. A random effects meta-analysis model was completed for studies that reported total or moderate-to-heavy LTPA scores in minutes per week. Overall, participants (n=1675) engaged in 260 [205;329] (mean [95% CI]) mins/week of total LTPA. Those participating in moderate-heavy intensity LTPA (n=364) completed 173 [118; 255] (mean [95% CI]) mins/week. LTPA modalities included walking, wheeling, hand-cycling, basketball, and swimming, among others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While many older adults with SCI seem to be meeting the recommended weekly physical activity volume, many still remain sedentary. There was significant variation in reporting of frequency, intensity, and duration of LTPA and reporting on modality was limited. Because of differences in reporting, it was challenging to compare results across studies. Data constraints prevented subgroup analysis of LTPA disparities between paraplegia and tetraplegia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000259/pdfft?md5=419d60a42237e9a0e473e66352725ea0&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000259-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the amount of Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA) that people over 45 years with a spinal cord injury (SCI) performed and to determine the frequency, duration, intensity, and modality of LTPA performed.

Data Sources

We searched 5 major electronic databases (CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed) from inception to March 2023.

Study Selection

Cross-sectional, longitudinal studies and control arm of controlled trials that assessed LTPA in participants over 45 years old, with a SCI. We included 19 studies in the review and 11 in the meta-analysis.

Data Extraction

We followed the PRISMA checklist for Systematic Reviews. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data on participants’ demographics, injury characteristics, and LTPA participation of the included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanne Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Any conflicts were resolved by a third author.

Data Synthesis

We found considerable variability in LTPA participation in adults 45 years and older with SCI. An estimated 27%-64% of participants did not take part in any LTPA. A random effects meta-analysis model was completed for studies that reported total or moderate-to-heavy LTPA scores in minutes per week. Overall, participants (n=1675) engaged in 260 [205;329] (mean [95% CI]) mins/week of total LTPA. Those participating in moderate-heavy intensity LTPA (n=364) completed 173 [118; 255] (mean [95% CI]) mins/week. LTPA modalities included walking, wheeling, hand-cycling, basketball, and swimming, among others.

Conclusions

While many older adults with SCI seem to be meeting the recommended weekly physical activity volume, many still remain sedentary. There was significant variation in reporting of frequency, intensity, and duration of LTPA and reporting on modality was limited. Because of differences in reporting, it was challenging to compare results across studies. Data constraints prevented subgroup analysis of LTPA disparities between paraplegia and tetraplegia.

脊髓损伤的中老年人是否参加闲暇体育活动?系统回顾与元分析
目标调查 45 岁以上脊髓损伤(SCI)患者进行的闲暇时间体育活动(LTPA)的数量,并确定进行 LTPA 的频率、持续时间、强度和方式。数据来源我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 3 月的 5 个主要电子数据库(CINAHL、SCOPUS、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 PubMed)。我们在综述中纳入了 19 项研究,在荟萃分析中纳入了 11 项研究。两位综述作者独立评估了偏倚风险,并提取了纳入研究的参与者人口统计学特征、损伤特征和LTPA参与情况的数据。偏倚风险采用乔安-布里格斯研究所的横断面研究关键评估工具进行评估。数据综述我们发现,45 岁及以上患有 SCI 的成年人在参与 LTPA 方面存在很大差异。据估计,27%-64%的参与者没有参加任何LTPA活动。对于以每周分钟为单位报告总LTPA或中重度LTPA得分的研究,我们完成了随机效应荟萃分析模型。总体而言,参与者(n=1675)每周参与总LTPA的时间为260[205;329]分钟(平均值[95% CI])。参加中-高强度LTPA的参与者(人数=364)每周完成173 [118; 255]分钟(平均值[95% CI])。结论虽然许多患有 SCI 的老年人似乎达到了建议的每周体育活动量,但仍有许多人久坐不动。关于长期体育锻炼的频率、强度和持续时间的报告差异很大,关于运动方式的报告也很有限。由于报告的差异,比较不同研究的结果具有挑战性。由于数据限制,无法对截瘫和四肢瘫痪患者之间的LTPA差异进行分组分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信