Mesenchymal stem cells in autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Hailey N. Swain , Parker D. Boyce , Bradley A. Bromet , Kaiden Barozinksy , Lacy Hance , Dakota Shields , Gayla R. Olbricht , Julie A. Semon
{"title":"Mesenchymal stem cells in autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies","authors":"Hailey N. Swain ,&nbsp;Parker D. Boyce ,&nbsp;Bradley A. Bromet ,&nbsp;Kaiden Barozinksy ,&nbsp;Lacy Hance ,&nbsp;Dakota Shields ,&nbsp;Gayla R. Olbricht ,&nbsp;Julie A. Semon","doi":"10.1016/j.biochi.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are of interest in the clinic because of their immunomodulation capabilities, capacity to act upstream of inflammation, and ability to sense metabolic environments. In standard physiologic conditions, they play a role in maintaining the homeostasis of tissues and organs; however, there is evidence that they can contribute to some autoimmune diseases. Gaining a deeper understanding of the factors that transition MSCs from their physiological function to a pathological role in their native environment, and elucidating mechanisms that reduce their therapeutic relevance in regenerative medicine, is essential. We conducted a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of human MSCs in preclinical studies of autoimmune disease, evaluating 60 studies that included 845 patient samples and 571 control samples. MSCs from any tissue source were included, and the study was limited to four autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and lupus. We developed a novel Risk of Bias tool to determine study quality for <em>in vitro</em> studies. Using the International Society for Cell &amp; Gene Therapy's criteria to define an MSC, most studies reported no difference in morphology, adhesion, cell surface markers, or differentiation into bone, fat, or cartilage when comparing control and autoimmune MSCs. However, there were reported differences in proliferation. Additionally, 308 biomolecules were differentially expressed, and the abilities to migrate, invade, and form capillaries were decreased. The findings from this study could help to explain the pathogenic mechanisms of autoimmune disease and potentially lead to improved MSC-based therapeutic applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300908424000841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are of interest in the clinic because of their immunomodulation capabilities, capacity to act upstream of inflammation, and ability to sense metabolic environments. In standard physiologic conditions, they play a role in maintaining the homeostasis of tissues and organs; however, there is evidence that they can contribute to some autoimmune diseases. Gaining a deeper understanding of the factors that transition MSCs from their physiological function to a pathological role in their native environment, and elucidating mechanisms that reduce their therapeutic relevance in regenerative medicine, is essential. We conducted a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of human MSCs in preclinical studies of autoimmune disease, evaluating 60 studies that included 845 patient samples and 571 control samples. MSCs from any tissue source were included, and the study was limited to four autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and lupus. We developed a novel Risk of Bias tool to determine study quality for in vitro studies. Using the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy's criteria to define an MSC, most studies reported no difference in morphology, adhesion, cell surface markers, or differentiation into bone, fat, or cartilage when comparing control and autoimmune MSCs. However, there were reported differences in proliferation. Additionally, 308 biomolecules were differentially expressed, and the abilities to migrate, invade, and form capillaries were decreased. The findings from this study could help to explain the pathogenic mechanisms of autoimmune disease and potentially lead to improved MSC-based therapeutic applications.

间充质干细胞在自身免疫性疾病中的应用:临床前研究的系统综述和荟萃分析》。
间充质干细胞(MSCs)因其免疫调节能力、在炎症上游发挥作用的能力以及感知代谢环境的能力而备受临床关注。在标准生理条件下,间叶干细胞在维持组织和器官的平衡方面发挥作用;但有证据表明,间叶干细胞可导致某些自身免疫性疾病。深入了解间充质干细胞在其原生环境中从生理功能转变为病理作用的因素,并阐明降低其在再生医学中治疗相关性的机制至关重要。我们对自身免疫性疾病临床前研究中的人类间充质干细胞进行了系统回顾和元分析,评估了60项研究,其中包括845份患者样本和571份对照样本。研究对象包括任何组织来源的间充质干细胞,研究仅限于四种自身免疫性疾病:多发性硬化症、类风湿性关节炎、系统性硬化症和狼疮。我们开发了一种新型的偏倚风险工具来确定体外研究的质量。根据国际细胞与amp;基因治疗学会对间叶干细胞的定义标准,大多数研究报告称,对照组和自身免疫组间叶干细胞在形态、粘附性、细胞表面标志物或骨、脂肪或软骨分化方面没有差异。不过,有报告称两者在增殖方面存在差异。此外,308 种生物大分子的表达存在差异,迁移、侵袭和形成毛细血管的能力下降。这项研究的发现有助于解释自身免疫性疾病的致病机制,并有可能改进基于间充质干细胞的治疗应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信