Association of Frailty With In-hospital and Long-term Outcomes Among STEMI Patients Receiving Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"Association of Frailty With In-hospital and Long-term Outcomes Among STEMI Patients Receiving Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Frailty is generally a marker of worse prognosis. The impact of frailty on both in-hospital and long-term outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has not been well described. Given this context, we aimed to determine the prevalence and impact of frailty on in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study reviewed STEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent pPCI at 1 of the 2 pPCI-capable hospitals at Vancouver Coastal Health. A frailty index (FI) was determined using a deficit-accumulation model, with those with an FI &gt; 0.25 being defined as frail. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included in-hospital all-cause mortality, a composite of adverse in-hospital outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, reinfarction, major bleeding, or stroke), and the individual components of the composite.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1579 patients were reviewed, of which 228 (14.4%) were determined to be frail. After multivariable adjustment, greater frailty (ie, increasing FI) was associated with increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.35, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), the composite adverse in-hospital outcome (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10-2.00, <em>P</em> = 0.011).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a contemporary STEMI cohort of older patients receiving pPCI, 1 in 7 patients were frail, with greater frailty being independently associated with increased in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes. These findings highlight the need for the early recognition of frailty and implementation of an interdisciplinary approach toward the management of frail STEMI patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"6 8","pages":"Pages 1004-1012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24001756/pdfft?md5=d19fc893da4017aba569793279b136d6&pid=1-s2.0-S2589790X24001756-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24001756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Frailty is generally a marker of worse prognosis. The impact of frailty on both in-hospital and long-term outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has not been well described. Given this context, we aimed to determine the prevalence and impact of frailty on in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed STEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent pPCI at 1 of the 2 pPCI-capable hospitals at Vancouver Coastal Health. A frailty index (FI) was determined using a deficit-accumulation model, with those with an FI > 0.25 being defined as frail. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included in-hospital all-cause mortality, a composite of adverse in-hospital outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, reinfarction, major bleeding, or stroke), and the individual components of the composite.

Results

A total of 1579 patients were reviewed, of which 228 (14.4%) were determined to be frail. After multivariable adjustment, greater frailty (ie, increasing FI) was associated with increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.35, P < 0.001), the composite adverse in-hospital outcome (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68, P < 0.001), and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10-2.00, P = 0.011).

Conclusions

In a contemporary STEMI cohort of older patients receiving pPCI, 1 in 7 patients were frail, with greater frailty being independently associated with increased in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes. These findings highlight the need for the early recognition of frailty and implementation of an interdisciplinary approach toward the management of frail STEMI patients.

Abstract Image

接受初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 STEMI 患者的虚弱程度与住院及长期预后的关系
背景虚弱通常是预后较差的标志。关于虚弱对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者院内和长期预后的影响,还没有很好的描述。有鉴于此,我们旨在确定接受一级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的 STEMI 患者中虚弱的发生率及其对住院和 1 年预后的影响。这项回顾性研究回顾了年龄≥ 65 岁、在温哥华海岸医疗中心两家具备 pPCI 能力的医院中的一家接受 pPCI 治疗的 STEMI 患者。采用赤字累积模型确定虚弱指数 (FI),将 FI 为 0.25 的患者定义为虚弱患者。主要结果是1年全因死亡率。次要结局包括院内全因死亡率、院内不良结局综合(全因死亡率、心源性休克、心力衰竭、再梗死、大出血或中风)以及综合结果的各个组成部分。结果 共对 1579 名患者进行了复查,其中 228 人(14.4%)被确定为体弱者。经多变量调整后,体弱程度越高(即 FI 越高),院内全因死亡率(几率比 [OR],1.88;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.50-2.35,P < 0.001)、院内综合不良结局(OR,1.46;95% CI,1.27-1.68,P < 0.结论在接受 pPCI 的当代 STEMI 老年患者队列中,每 7 名患者中就有 1 名体弱者,体弱程度越高,院内和长期不良预后越严重。这些发现凸显了早期识别体弱的必要性,以及采用跨学科方法管理体弱 STEMI 患者的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信